Should The United States Have Become Half-Free Or Half Free Essay
Could the United States have become half-slave and half-free and not fought the Civil War...Why or Why not?
The United States could not have been half-slave and half-free without fighting the Civil War. I say this because the North and South had quite a bit of things going on between the two. It is too much of a contradiction to be half-slave and half-free. In a perfect world, this might have worked, but in the real world, it has to be one or the other. During the development of the thirteen colonies, diversity set in early. In the South, the moderate climate made the growth of tobacco a suitable and very profitable business. Growing this crop required a lot of land, and therefore settlers lived far apart. Northern colonies, though, were much more …show more content…
Southerners felt that the Federal government was passing laws, such as import taxes, that treated them unfairly. They believed that individual states had the right to "nullify", or overturn, any law the Federal government passed. They also believed that individual states had the right to leave the United States and form their own independent country. Most people in the North believed that the concepts of "nullification" and "states ' rights" would make the United States a weaker country and were against these ideas. (“Causes of Civil War,” 2005)
A key line from a letter Abraham Lincoln wrote to George Robertson stated, “Slaves will never be free unless there is War.” (Norman, 2014). The war was inevitable to happen in order to abolish slavery. With the election of Abraham Lincoln and more individuals realizing that people should not be bought and sold like property, there was no way things could have been half-slave and half-free. Even though the Civil War was not all about slavery, it was a stepping-stone to start it. America was designed to be a federal republic, which operates on democratic
The United States could not have been half-slave and half-free without fighting the Civil War. I say this because the North and South had quite a bit of things going on between the two. It is too much of a contradiction to be half-slave and half-free. In a perfect world, this might have worked, but in the real world, it has to be one or the other. During the development of the thirteen colonies, diversity set in early. In the South, the moderate climate made the growth of tobacco a suitable and very profitable business. Growing this crop required a lot of land, and therefore settlers lived far apart. Northern colonies, though, were much more …show more content…
Southerners felt that the Federal government was passing laws, such as import taxes, that treated them unfairly. They believed that individual states had the right to "nullify", or overturn, any law the Federal government passed. They also believed that individual states had the right to leave the United States and form their own independent country. Most people in the North believed that the concepts of "nullification" and "states ' rights" would make the United States a weaker country and were against these ideas. (“Causes of Civil War,” 2005)
A key line from a letter Abraham Lincoln wrote to George Robertson stated, “Slaves will never be free unless there is War.” (Norman, 2014). The war was inevitable to happen in order to abolish slavery. With the election of Abraham Lincoln and more individuals realizing that people should not be bought and sold like property, there was no way things could have been half-slave and half-free. Even though the Civil War was not all about slavery, it was a stepping-stone to start it. America was designed to be a federal republic, which operates on democratic