Preview

Kansas Bleeding Kansas

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1916 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kansas Bleeding Kansas
Bleeding Kansas is a term used to describe the period of violence during the settling of the Kansas territory. The period of violence in 1854 is called, "The Bleeding Kansas". The Missouri Compromise was overturned and became the "Kansas-Nebraska Act. This new act would let the residents decide whether the area would become a slave state or a free state. Of all the Union States Kansas suffered the most casualties because of the issues of slavery being divided. Free-state settlers and proslavery settlers went to Kansas to help decide the decision. The Republican Party opposed slavery which promoted the Democrats to conform with the Republicans. The political fight over slavery is what led to the civil conflict in Kansas.
In the decades
…show more content…
5 days later, 68 federal troops stationed in Charleston, South Carolina, withdrew to castle SUMTER, an island in CHARLESTON HARBOR. The North considered the citadel to be the assets of the united states government. The humans of South Carolina believed it belonged to the new Confederacy. 4 months later, the primary engagement of the Civil struggle passed off on this disputed soil. The commander at citadel Sumter, primary ROBERT ANDERSON, was a former slave proprietor who was though genuinely unswerving to the Union. With 6,000 South Carolina, armed forces ringing the harbor, Anderson and his squaddies had been reducing off from reinforcements and resupplies. In January 1861, as one the closing acts of his management, President James Buchanan dispatched two hundred infantrymen and components on an unarmed merchant vessel, celebrity OF THE WEST, to reinforce Anderson. It speedy departed when South Carolina artillery started out firing on it.The Civil struggle started out at four:30 a.m. on April 12, 1861, when accomplice artillery, under the command of fashionable PIERRE GUSTAVE T. BEAUREGARD, opened fire on citadel Sumter. confederate batteries showered the fort with over three,000 shells in a three-and-a-half of day length. Anderson surrendered. mockingly, Beauregard had advanced his army capabilities under Anderson's education at West point. This became the primary of infinite relationships and families devastated …show more content…
Going as far back as 1798, there had been an ongoing debate over whether or not the Federal government had the right to pass laws that contradicted laws already in place at the State level. While many people claim that the South was attempting to break up the Union, it was more accurately a case of them attempting to stand up for themselves and declare that the laws passed within a State had superiority. In fact, the preamble to the Confederate States Constitution starts with "We, the people of the Confederate States, each State acting in its sovereign and independent character. And that’s what the who or what is to blame for the South’s Secession from the United

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Battle of Fort Sumter is the first battle of the Civil War. Fort Sumter is located in an artificial island in the harbor of Charleston, South Carolina, built in the wake of the War of 1812 . After South Carolina’s secession from the Union on December 20, 1860, Maj. Robert Anderson and his force of 85 soldiers were positioned at Fort Moultrie near the mouth of Charleston Harbor. On December 26, fearing for their safety, Anderson moved his command to Fort Sumter. All the forts along the coast except Fort Sumter and other four forts, had been given up to the Confederate States without having to fight. But Sumter was especially important because of its location and its purpose: to guard the Charleston Harbor, a territory of significance for the rebels.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act opened another battleground to the controversy. By leaving the slavery question up to popular sovereignty, Congress initiated a race between abolitionist and proslavery forces to control Kansas. Abolitionists encouraged free-soil advocates from New England and New York state to move to Kansas. Ministers like Henry Ward Beecher supported this emigration and encouraged their parishioners to help fund free-soil advocates. Meanwhile, proslavery forces urged slaveowners to relocate with their slaves. Southerners from Missouri and farther southeast made the move. The resulting conflict and bloodshed between the two groups earned the area the nickname Bleeding Kansas.4…

    • 4060 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kansas Nebraska Act Dbq

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act that was passed by Congress in 1854 increased the already building tension between the North and the South. It caused a civil war in Kansas and many people believed that it was one of the causes of the American Civil War. The disastrous effects that were caused by the Kansas-Nebraska Act serves as an example of what could happen if people in America today were to become as divided over an issue as they were over…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dbq 1850's

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Constitution can be interpreted in many different ways, which leads to sectional discord and tension. For many reasons, the South evidently did not…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    their views on the Constitution; the South felt that individual states should have the right…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bleeding Kansas is the phrase that represents the duration of the disturbance during the settling of the Kansas territory. Because of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, the residents now had to determine whether the area would become a free or slave state. Since there was so much dispute between pro-slavery and anti-slavery people, a war developed inside Kansas.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Bleeding Kansas” was a term used by Horace Greeley of the New York Tribune to describe the violence between pro and antislavery forces in the Kansas territory during the mid and late 1850s. The blame of who is responsible for this violence is placed on both sides yet it seems that the South should take more responsibility for the violence there. First off, the south starts the violence with no incitement from the North at the Raid on Lawrence. Then there was the Sumner-Brooks issue after Sumner delivered a insulting speech agains pro-slavery groups. Although the South started the violence, the North did have some responsibility. They retaliate after the Raid on Lawrence and cause deaths.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Secession Dbq Essay

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages

    There is certainly no shortage of opinion on whether the southern states had the right to secede from the union in 1860-61. After all, northern state governments as well as the election of Lincoln placed the south into a defensive posture to protect their particular institution. Secession has a long history in world governmental intercourse and the founding of American independence did not inoculate them from the threats of secession. States began to discuss secession even before the ink had dried on the new constitution. Justification, regardless as to the state threatening secession, was founded on the belief that the states had the right to govern themselves and the right of the people to abolish a government when it becomes destructive…

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bleeding kansas

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Many Kansans will certainly remember the years 1854 to 1861. It was filled with bloodshed, rebellious actions, lynching, and more bloodshed. The groups responsible for this viciousness were the ignorant pro-slavery and the anti-slavery clashing in their differences. Within a few months, Kansas was invaded by raids and riots from left and right. Stephan Douglass pushed for The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 which allowed the territory of Kansas to decide whether it would be free territory or slave territory, a practice known as popular sovereignty. It was obvious this decision was not going to be fixed properly or peacefully. People from other states soon decided to invade in the discussions and cross over into Kansas Territory to try and fix the votes making Kansas pro-slavery. From the south came people called Border Ruffians who made this issue a lot more difficult than it should be. They began a lot of violence, such as the “Raid on Lawrence” in attempt to force the acceptance of slavery. Why do they feel the need to invade in issues that should not be their business? In May 1856, Ruffians crossed the border and looted and burned multiple buildings, this act kicked open the door to more violent acts. A few days later the anti-slavery supporters caused the Pottawatomie Creek Massacre. John Brown attacked a pro-slavery settlement, killing five of the men. This controversy and violence was so large and out of control that it was impossible for federal authorities to contain it.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the American Revolution, there was only a few events that shook the whole country. However, on December 20, 1860, South Carolina declared its secession from the United States. This event shocked everyone in the country and some of the foreign countries could not even believe this news. South Carolina was part of the Southern States who greatly supported slavery to be instituted everywhere and not be abolished. So, when there were anti-slavery movements that occurred in the country, South Carolina decided to secede from the United States and became its own separate state. South Carolina even wrote its own Declaration of Independence stating the philosophies that is believed in that state only. Since then, many people have argued that when South Carolina did secede from the country, they committed treason. More specifically, the reasons why many people have considered South Carolina as a traitor is because it appointed its own president, developed its own military army, and created its own flag.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 was a controversial legislation that opened Kansas and Nebraska to white settlement, repealed the Compromise of 1850, and led opponents to form the Republican party. This piece of legislation was introduced in Congress that revived the issues of the expansion of slavery. The Compromise of 1850 was a series of measures passed by Congress to resolve sectional tensions. Congress admitted California to the Union as a free state. And organize the territories of New Mexico, Nevada, Arizona, and Utah without mention of slavery. It also paid Texan $10 million to relinquish land claims in New Mexico and abolished the slave trade in the District of Columbia (but not slavery) while enacted a law requiring the return of fugitive slaves. (Martin 369)Douglas who pushed the Compromise of 1850, and then stated he “would never make a speech of slavery again” also proposed that the area west of Iowa and Missouri (which was set aside as permanent Indian reservation) be organized as the Nebraska territory to white settlers. Since Nebraska was located in the northern half of the…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The constitution is a contract between states and federal government that create fundamental principles and established precedents on how a state will be governed. This contract, in the opinion of the Confederate States of America, has been broken by the federal government, which has lead to the secession of South Carolina. In document Declaration of the Immediate Causes Which Induce and Justify the Secession of South Carolina, the main purpose is to justify their leaving the Union. The document argues that the government became “destructive of the ends for which it is instituted.” This is the justification of the State of South Carolina; if the government can break the contract that is the constitution then the state can leave the…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What the southern states want also goes against the ideas that our founding fathers built this great country. Although i can see where their point view is coming from about the rights of the states, but this problem of social segregation needs to be fixed nation wide not just in certain states, therefore the federal government should intervene with the states. The federal government solving an issue through the Supreme Court for the whole nation is the best way to solve problems. The United States was built off liberty, freedom, rights, and equality, and what the southern states want is going against the idea of equality. Although segregation wasn’t just present in schools but also in other public places, this small step to unifying races in schools was beginning of the end of segregation and beginning of equality amongst everyone. This conflict really was the beginning of desegregation and equality. After this conflict many riots broke out, protests, the Rosa Parks incident, civil right movements,etc. Another reason why this segregation thing in the US was wrong, was because World War 2 had just ended and one main thing the US was fighting against Germany was RACISM! The US was fighting racism in Germany, for the Jews. Racism wasn’t the only thing the US was fighting against in Europe, but it did play an important role. The US fought against racism and equality, but in our own country at the time was full of racism and equality, which showed that the US was just being a hypocrite. Also many african americans fought in the wara and all of them realized what was going on back home, and it wasn’t right and something needed to change. Although the southern states did make some great points, but everything they believed in was wrong, therefore i believe what the Congress was doing at the time was the right thing to…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some portion of the debate that prompted the Civil War (1861– 1865) concerned federalism. Numerous Southerners felt that state governments alone had the power to settle on important choices, for example, whether slavery ought to be legal. Advocates of states' rights supported the individual state governments had the ;supreme law' the central government in light of the fact that the states had created the federal government through the ratification of the Constitution. Most Southern states ended up seceding from the Union since they felt that withdrawal was the best way to secure their rights. Abraham Lincoln and numerous Northerners held that the Union together; their triumph confirmed the national government's right to have control over the…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bleeding Kansas is the period of violence during the settling of Kansas. The Kansas-Nebraska Act nullified the Missouri compromise and instead used popular sovereignty. Free-state and proslavery settlers rushed into Kansas hoping to influence their opinions and ideas into the state's decision. Soon violence attacks started to occur. Including John Brown's raid on Harper’s Ferry.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays