Preview

Should non-citizens be allowed to vote.

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2142 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should non-citizens be allowed to vote.
In today's globalizing world many countries have non citizens in their major cities. This portion of the population mostly consists of members of the country's labor force. It is these people however who are also suffering due to low incomes and other challenges that arise from living in a new country. Political leaders trying to get elected attempt to base their campaigns which are meant to help this target group. Unfortunately most of these people are not citizens and therefore they can't vote for them. This leads to the politicians who address the citizens of the nation to winning the election. As a result the non citizens don't get the help they need. Without help, these non citizens find it very difficult to reach their goals and settling down with comfort. The concept of having non citizens voting in municipal elections isn’t a foreign idea. However there is a lot of opposition which is very reasonable. Non citizens should not be granted the right to vote in municipal elections because it could decrease the number of non citizens seeking citizenship, makes the election more expensive than it already is and increases the administrative process to identify a way to select who can vote, and is unfair for current citizens of the nation who earned their citizenship and proved they want to be active citizens.
For a non citizen to become eligible to vote they must first become a citizen of the nation. The requirements vary by nation but usually there are two requirements that are standard. First they must live for a certain period of time in that country and write a test which would test their knowledge on the country. This could be a lengthy process but ensures only those who have shown their commitment to become citizens actually get their citizenship. In most developed countries and some developing countries it is the non citizens that are suffering because the political leaders don't always have their best interests. The leaders who want to help can't

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Countries like Australia, Italy, Peru and more, have compulsory voting, from the source of the International institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance(International IDEA)(Doc. A). These countries have had required voting for at least a century. Not only that but there have been countries that have had successful compulsory voting. An example would be Peru’s compulsory voting system which will be represented by a Jimmy Carter’s “Peru Trip Report” which he wrote after visiting Peru after his presidency. “...they overcame this initial problem, and nationwide voting was completed almost perfectly and on time.” “We could see no possibility of any error in the casting and counting of ballots, and (for the first time in our experience as monitors) there was not a single complaint….”(Doc. E). With the evidence above it can be seen that not only do other countries have compulsory voting but have done it…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Non-voters are often generalized as lazy or selfish, but it viable that it is in their own self-interest not to vote. Forcing someone to betray their own self-interest it strictly undemocratic. A non-vote can mean apathy, but it can also mean disagreement or contentment with all candidates. Even if a compulsory system could be considered constitutional, how would the finer point be determined? To what extend will the United States go to enforce it? Furthermore, to what degree of punishment does the citizen have to pay if they neglect the “democratic duty” to cast a vote? Even further, how many strikes does that citizen get? Will the punishments continue to get worse as they continue to abstain from placing their vote? These are all crucial questions that would take…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Instead of major parties or candidates that always have the advantage of winning, minor parties or candidates will have a chance at receiving more votes due to the increased population of voting. Notably, states that are overwhelmingly democratic or republican like California or Texas respectively can have a chance to become swing states free of party support. Simply, the more people vote the more likelihood there is of having closer election results because of all the different views that people possess. Honestly, local and national elections only have a limited number of party groups that win because of all the party political groups that are coherent to that location. All the influence and funding that is put into these groups has tarnished the integrity of the election and has effected the location around them. With the use of mandatory voting, the number of people with nonpartisan opinions will overweigh the votes of political clubs causing fair game. It is sensible to have local communities or states to have equal odds in voting because there will be less inaccuracies on political outlooks in these…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Voting is a duty that must be fulfilled by every citizen at some point in their lives. Voting gives the citizens of the U.S. a chance to express themselves through an anonymous voice. There are a few restrictions on voting, which include age, citizenship, and in some states weather you’re a convicted felon. I believe that it is unfair that some states make it so felons can’t vote. I really believe felons should be allowed to vote simply because everyone makes mistakes, and some felons have to rejoin society eventually.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Regarding the improvement of the United States voter, turn-out, we must start with the most important thing, registering more people to vote. Personally, I am not registered to vote. I recently moved from North Carolina and would find it very convenient if I could register online. We live in technology age, where we download an app simply to order pizza, we can order furniture from a website, and even apply for jobs online. Why can I not submit a voter registration application online? I understand that fraud is a horrible and inevitable part of the internet, but this would be very fitting for the current and upcoming generation. We all can admit that we love to receive mail, that is not a bill. Therefore, I suggest that the government sends out a letter containing the registration papers to all eligible voters in the mail, with a return envelope. This way voters can easily have the correct papers to register, and they will not have the go through the hassle of finding a stamp or envelope to return the registration papers.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Second, and closely related, was the issue of whether the roughly four million freedmen should be allowed to vote. The issue was how to receive the four million former slaves as citizens. If they were to be fully counted as citizens, some sort of representation for apportionment of seats in Congress had to be determined. Before the war, the population of slaves had been counted as three-fifths of a corresponding number of free whites. By having four million freedmen counted as full citizens, the South would gain additional seats in Congress. If blacks were denied the vote and the right to hold office, then only whites would represent them. Many conservatives, including most white southerners, northern Democrats, and some northern Republicans, opposed black voting. Some northern states that had referenda on the subject limited the ability of their own small populations of blacks to vote.…

    • 1318 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    About 5.26 million people with a felony conviction are not allowed to vote in elections. Each state has its own laws on disenfranchisement. Nine states in America permanently restrict felons from voting while Vermont and Maine allow felons to vote while in prison. Proponents of felon re-enfranchisement believe felons who have paid their debt to society by completing their sentences should have all of their rights and privileges restored. They argue that efforts to block ex-felons from voting are unfair, undemocratic, and politically or racially motivated. Opponents of felon voting say the restrictions are consistent with other voting limitations such as age, residency, mental capacity, and other felon restrictions such as no guns for violent offenders. They say that convicted felons have demonstrated poor judgment and should not be trusted with a vote. I believe convicted felons should be allowed to vote upon release from prison because they exercise good judgment; in addition, withholding their right to vote would be a violation of the US Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the eighth amendment.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is nearly absurd to perceive how many illegal immigrants are driving around the United States without a driver's license. Illegal immigration has been a debatable topic in the United States. Moreover getting a drivers license is not as easy as in other countries for illegal immigrants. Regardless of their status, people, should be competent to obtain a drivers license, generating a reduction in hit-and-run accidents, beneficial law enforcement's, as well as safer roads for the nations brighter future.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They bring up that non-subject voting was, at one time, permitted in various early American states and domains and that it is as of now permitted in other Western vote based systems. They contend that it is not out of the question to permit non-citizens to vote since they bear a hefty portion of the obligations of nationals, such as paying taxes, however are not formally spoken to. What's more, they say, permitting, non-citizens to vote will have civic value as a training ground for the responsibilities of citizenship. Legal immigrants should be able to vote. This implies, regardless of the possibility that one doesn't qualify as a "resident" by living in the United States for a long time, despite everything they still have a basic knowledge of all the parties and amendments. In fact, most immigrants have more information than the average United States citizen about the legislature. Immigrants are individuals as well. They can't be denied their 'unalienable fundamental human rights' only because they weren’t born in the United States. If they live here they should have the right to vote in favor of the people choosing their…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human beings of all ages flee their countries from abuse, each and every person deserves the chance to start a new. It’s not fair for us to deny the rights of an individual to begin again. Men and women should have the opportunity to achieve citizenship. Without reform, 11 million continue to live in uncertainty and fear. Illegal immigrants should have the right to be naturalized due to them benefiting the economy, playing a critical role in our nation, and it’s just the morally right decision.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the coming of electronic voting machines (EVMs), it was not even possible for voters to invalidate their votes by scratching out ballots or voting for two candidates. The only way to ensure that the vote is not wasted on an undeserving candidate was to not participate in the elections. As a result, Indian democracy has suffered from lower voting turnouts and growing dissatisfaction with the quality of candidates contesting elections. In the 2009 general elections, only 58% of registered voters cast their ballots, as against a high of 63% a quarter of a century ago. However, Indian voters going to the polls now have a new choice available to them: “none of the above (NOTA)”. The voters will not have to stand out of elections or invalidate their votes, or…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the United States, we have the privilege to vote. This privilege was given to us through the constitution and its amendments. Today, every citizen of the United States has the right to vote. When the Declaration of Independence was signed, the right to vote was limited exclusively for white protestant men who owned property. In 1792, New Hampshire was the first state that discarded the property requirement to vote. Maryland became the last state to eliminate a religious restriction on voting. This allowed almost every white man to have the right to vote. In the years of 1869 and 1870, the fifteenth Amendment was passed giving all men the right to vote, no matter their race or color. The years 1919 to 1920 were big years for women. The Nineteenth Amendment was passed by congress, giving all citizens the right to vote no matter their gender. Then in 1971, the Twenty-Sixth Amendment enforced the national voting age of eighteen and older.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the United States of America, we consider voting to be an obvious right that everyone deserves. It is a part of our lifestyle and crucial in our government. Despite its importance, voting is not mandatory for American citizens. Only after becoming a registered voter, any United States citizen over the age of 18 can cast their ballot for who they want in positions of power within the government. Those who want to vote are able to, and several accommodations are provided for people who find themselves incapable of making it to the polls on Election Day. Without voters, our government would be unable to function properly. Compulsory voting should be put into effect in the United States, because over public awareness of politics would increase, the power of separate political parties will decrease, and the election results will reflect the public’s true opinion.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Anyone born in the United States are a US Citizen automatically however immigrants have to apply and pass the test for a citizenship which usually occurs after a waiting process of about 5 years. With that said, a substantial amount of Asian Americans are not citizens. Legally, non-citizens cannot vote, so groups with a high percentage of non-citizens like Asian Americans will have low voter turnout rates in comparison to groups who have fewer non-citizens. For an immigrant to be able to vote, it involves a long voting process that requires three steps: naturalization, registration, and the third is to actually vote. Immigrants must undergo and pass an interview and test before they can be “naturalized”. Therefore, they must have knowledge of US government and history also must answer questions in English. In the testing, applicants will be required to answer questions about the US such as: Who can veto a bill? What year was the Constitution drafted? The Congress is made of what two parts? What is the name of the first ten amendments of the US Constitution? After passing the first step of naturalization in order to vote, the second step is registration. Both naturalized and US-born citizens follow the same rulings of voter registration but it’s been shown that naturalized citizens do not register as much as…

    • 1866 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Do you think naturalized citizens should become president? Well, my answer is yes. I think they shouldn't have any criminal records. Also, they should study laws and make sure they know if they really want to run. There are things I would like to change. Like they don't necessary need to live here for the last fourteen years. And they don't need an education if they couldn't afford one, but they shouldn't be serving for more than two…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays