Mandatory Voting Pros And Cons
As the nation stands, only about 30-50 percent of the United States has voted for a presidential candidate since 2000. A disappointment it is to only have at most about half of the US vote being that it has the third largest population in the world. However, to resolve this dilemma, the idea of mandatory voting could be used to help get the voice of the whole nation out. The need of mandatory is immense for it will better represent the population of America, level the playing field of candidate parties, and it will give the incentive for more informed voting causing the better quality of voters. To start, mandatory voting will benefit the majority of the people because there will be a better representation of societies’ views. Initially, this nation was found
…show more content…
Instead of major parties or candidates that always have the advantage of winning, minor parties or candidates will have a chance at receiving more votes due to the increased population of voting. Notably, states that are overwhelmingly democratic or republican like California or Texas respectively can have a chance to become swing states free of party support. Simply, the more people vote the more likelihood there is of having closer election results because of all the different views that people possess. Honestly, local and national elections only have a limited number of party groups that win because of all the party political groups that are coherent to that location. All the influence and funding that is put into these groups has tarnished the integrity of the election and has effected the location around them. With the use of mandatory voting, the number of people with nonpartisan opinions will overweigh the votes of political clubs causing fair game. It is sensible to have local communities or states to have equal odds in voting because there will be less inaccuracies on political outlooks in these
Instead of major parties or candidates that always have the advantage of winning, minor parties or candidates will have a chance at receiving more votes due to the increased population of voting. Notably, states that are overwhelmingly democratic or republican like California or Texas respectively can have a chance to become swing states free of party support. Simply, the more people vote the more likelihood there is of having closer election results because of all the different views that people possess. Honestly, local and national elections only have a limited number of party groups that win because of all the party political groups that are coherent to that location. All the influence and funding that is put into these groups has tarnished the integrity of the election and has effected the location around them. With the use of mandatory voting, the number of people with nonpartisan opinions will overweigh the votes of political clubs causing fair game. It is sensible to have local communities or states to have equal odds in voting because there will be less inaccuracies on political outlooks in these