Preview

Proportional Representation in the US Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1119 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Proportional Representation in the US Government
Although most would agree that we live in a country whose foundation was based off of the ideals of liberty and democracy, a titanic number of citizens choose not to exercise their suffrage rights. The reason many American’s choose not to vote is because they feel they aren’t being adequately represented. This is likely because there is a lack of representation on many levels, rather it be on a race or gender standpoint. Even though our representatives are chosen through fair and democratic elections, our elections often result in an under-representation of women, ethnic minorities, and poorer social classes. This is due to our winner-take-all philosophy that routinely denies representation to a large number of voters and doesn’t accurately reflect the views of the public. There is a debate as to whether the United States should adopt some form of group representation voting system as opposed to the current winner-take-all system. Although it would require a constitutional change and a change in the minds of American’s, group representation is a certain way to ensure all American citizens are being adequately represented.
Group representation, also known as proportional representation, is designed to remedy electoral injustices. It ensures that any grouping of like-minded people, regardless of them being a minority or majority, get a fair share of power and representation in our legislation. Our current system of winner-take-all can allow someone to be elected with a 50.1% majority, leaving the opinion of 49.9% of the population to be dismissed. Because of this system, minorities have great difficulty amassing a large share of votes and stand little change of voters. If we utilized proportional representation, we would not only give these minorities not only the right to vote, but also an equal chance to be represented. For example, if black voters comprise 20% of the vote in a racially split county, they can elect at least one of the five seats, rather than be
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Gerrymandering: United States House of Representatives and Election District Boundaries
    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Gerrymandering: United States House of Representatives and Election District Boundaries

    The main purpose of gerrymandering is to increase the number of legislative seats that can be won by the political party which is in charge of redrawing the district boundaries during that period of time, and to create “safe” seats for the party’s incumbent legislators which are seats in which the incumbent will always win re-election. Gerrymandering is the redrawing of election district boundaries to give an electoral advantage to a particular candidate or party. It has been recognized as a part of the American political landscape since 1812. The term derives from a redrawing of US Representative districts in Massachusetts before the 1812 elections, when Elbridge Gerry was governor. People said the district was reminiscent of a salamander and thus the term Gerry-mander was coined. The Constitution requires that representation in the House of Representatives be apportioned to states on the basis of population. So, every ten years we count up the number of people living in each state and making sure that each state gets at least one House member, divide up the rest of the seats among the states equally. States with large populations get a bigger amount of house seats smaller states get just the one. A variety of Supreme Court cases, however, have applied the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause to the process of drawing legislative districts resulting in a requirement that each district have roughly the same population. So after each Census, states and localities have to redraw their district lines to ensure that the districts are roughly equal. This process redrawing of district lines has been blamed for almost every problem in American politics. The redistricting process therefore became a target for political reformers. In 2008, Californians enacted Prop. 11 and created the Citizens Redistricting Commission (CRC). State legislators would no longer be able to pick their own…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gerrymandering: Democracy and District Lines
    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gerrymandering: Democracy and District Lines

    Each decade politicians become wound up for the political war of who will win the control of Congress for the next decade or possibly longer. One of the most effective ways of manipulating elections, shy of corruption, is gerrymandering. Gerrymandering (pronounced “garrey” mandering not “jerry” mandering) is the government’s advantage of one political party over another. It is the process of drawing weirdly shaped lines to define a district. The term is derived from Elbridge Gerry, who was one of the founding fathers, who drew a weirdly shaped district that resembles a salamander, it was henceforth dubbed gerrymandering. One of the unfortunate truths in American society and political life is that although we are told that each individual vote counts, the reality is that sometimes people’s votes are less equal. Political power in Congress is based upon population, the bigger the state is, for example California and Texas, the bigger the reward is of more seats in Congress, rather than Rhode Island or Delaware. The states with a higher population are appointed more seats and they get those seats from the states with fewer people that are counted from the census. The effervescent image of American democracy is that of a vibrant government that is open to change and subject to will of its voters, unfortunately this is an illusion. The problem with redrawing lines is that it eliminates the evaluation process that the public has by preventing competitive elections. I feel like it is just another loophole, oppressive scheme for political officials to try and dictate against us. Politicians seem to have the mutual feeling that it is a birth right for them to represent certain districts but we are still in a democracy, not a dictatorship or a monarchy, we have the right to elect who we feel represents our communities voice most appropriately and violating that right by eliminating the person we feel best suites us from our district it is violating our Constitutional and…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Influence Of Gerrymandering On The Government
    • 208 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Influence Of Gerrymandering On The Government

    After voters elect government officials to office, they are assigned districts to represent by their respective state. Every ten years, a census of the United States population is taken, and the boundaries are redrawn so that every district has approximately the same population to ensure equal voter representation and is not controlled by a major political party. It is important to draw the lines so that every community in a district is given the chance to voice their concerns and opinions. It is also important to make sure that the lines are not manipulated by a political party to gain political advantage - this is called gerrymandering. Gerrymandering gives control to a major political party and affects the issues that a government will look…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gerrymandering Research Paper
    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gerrymandering Research Paper

    Proportional Representation elects multiple representatives in a district, each party offers multiple nominees to the voters. “An all-male slate or party list would look totally sexist; so parties nominate some women. But with one-winner districts, many voters don't notice if a party nominates only men.” (Accurate). In a multi-winner race, a woman running against a man is not seen as someone who just holds the position and does nothing. That woman is seen as someone who is running because of her beliefs, issues, and policies. But, most women like to run in “teams” of two or more candidates. The party’s list also may reveal if the party is biased either ethnically or religiously. “Many countries elect more women now than 20 years ago.” (Voter). Changing from single representative to proportional representation would increase the amount of women in Congress.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Was There A Need To Draw Lines That Create Voting Districts?
    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Was There A Need To Draw Lines That Create Voting Districts?

    Gerrymandering allows for a particular party to get bills passed easily by having a majority of their party in The House of Representatives and Senate. With this increase they will have enough votes to make a bill veto proof. Political and racial gerrymandering are unconstitutional and illegal. As stated in, The voting rights act of 1965 “prohibits spreading minorities across districts”The court’s solution required that states create majority-minority districts — districts in which the majority of the voting-age population belonged to a single minority. With voting that occurred largely along racial lines, these districts allowed minority voters to elect their candidates of choice.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Electoral College: A Trouble Prone And Undemocratic System
    • 2120 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Electoral College: A Trouble Prone And Undemocratic System

    The Electoral College is an institution that may have served a purpose 200 years ago when the founding fathers needed a system that would be met with approval by both large and small states. The Electoral College is a flawed method of electing our President that has created problems in previous elections and is likely to be the source of problems in the future. The Electoral College provides an undemocratic method of choosing our president that potentially undermines the will of the voters. Not only can a candidate be elected without actually winning the most votes, it puts our elections at the mercy of electors who don't always cast their vote as pledged. I intend to demonstrate that the problems inherent in this voting method far outweigh any benefits it may provide. Replacing the winner-take-all method of awarding electoral votes with a system such as proportional representation or eliminating the college altogether in favor of direct election is the best way to ensure a trouble-free and fair election…

    • 2120 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Lewis Voting System
    • 180 Words
    • 1 Page

    John Lewis Voting System

    John Lewis proclaims that the new voting bill will not cause the change yearned for since not all African Americans have the right to vote. For instance, in the text, Lewis states “the voting section of the bill will not help the thousands of black people who want to vote” (para 3). In other words, Lewis would like to bring to attention unequal the voting system is. The uses this evidence to suggest that if the voting system is unequal, then how can the bills in favor of those who cannot vote be put in place? He reminds the audience that together they stand and cry “One man. One vote.” (para 3). In making this comment, Lewis urges the crowd to remember what they are fighting for and that no one is alone in the fight for civil rights. Lewis’…

    • 180 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Abolishing The Electoral College
    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Abolishing The Electoral College

    Proponents for the Electoral College to remain the same argue that the Electoral College contributes to the cohesiveness of the country by requiring a distribution of popular support to be elected president, enhances the status of minority interests, contributes to the political stability of the country by encouraging a two-party system, and maintains a federal system of government and representation. They argue it contributes to the unification of the country because without the Electoral College system, the most populous states would hold all the power in selecting the president and the small states would not matter. With the Electoral College, every state matters in selecting the president. The Electoral College also enhances the status of minority interests. Candidates know that because minorities tend to concentrate in areas with a large number of votes, the minority can make the difference between receiving all the votes from that state, and receiving none of the votes from that state. In continuation, The Electoral College contributes to the political stability of the…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mandatory Voting Pros And Cons
    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mandatory Voting Pros And Cons

    As the nation stands, only about 30-50 percent of the United States has voted for a presidential candidate since 2000. A disappointment it is to only have at most about half of the US vote being that it has the third largest population in the world. However, to resolve this dilemma, the idea of mandatory voting could be used to help get the voice of the whole nation out. The need of mandatory is immense for it will better represent the population of America, level the playing field of candidate parties, and it will give the incentive for more informed voting causing the better quality of voters.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Is An Example Of Representative Democracy In America
    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What Is An Example Of Representative Democracy In America

    Citizens do not directly vote on specific issues or make ultimate decisions. Rather, the citizens will elect officials they believe represent their views well and, majority willing, that official will win. An example of this would be electing the President or members of Congress in the United States. Within that, states also elect local and state officials to represent them. The elected persons for particular positions should be aware about the problems and the popular opinions about those problems for the people they represent. This system was created as a foundation for representing the citizens of America rather than founding a direct…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Should Felons Be Allowed to Vote
    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Should Felons Be Allowed to Vote

    The disenfranchisement of a person is a heavy topic that you only hear about every four years during the Presidential Election. Why though? The reason: everyone has an opinion on the issue, but only few are willing to say anything about it. Some are afraid of the racial issue our country sees, and some are afraid to sway against their preferred political party.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Role Of Minorities In Congress
    • 223 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Role Of Minorities In Congress

    In the last few Congresses, the representation of minorities has continued to grow, and is the highest it has ever been. However, the percentage of minorities in Congress is still surprisingly low, only seventeen percent of the 114th Congress consists of non-whites. As gender and racial biases are continuously being squashed in the public square, very strong and more sensible reason for this high under-representation in Congress is because of the high reelection rate. With ninety-five percent of Congress members reelected, there is little room for the minorities to vote in a representative. And even though studies have concluded that females are more effective in political positions, only twenty percent of congress is made up of women.…

    • 223 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Representative Democracy In America
    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Representative Democracy In America

    When the Founding Fathers began designing America’s government in 1787, one of their greatest fears was the possibility of the dumb majority using their power to pass uneducated and disastrous legislature. They feared “the mob”, the everyday citizens that had little schooling and knew almost nothing about politics. To avoid giving the voters too much power, a Representative-Democracy style government was created, a system where citizens would vote for a person or group to represent them in making legislature. Referendum votes bypass the politicians and ask for the people’s opinion directly- they are direct votes where the entire country is invited to vote on an issue, which give the people a chance for their voices to be heard. While a good…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Research Paper: Woman Suffrage
    • 2809 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Research Paper: Woman Suffrage

    In most modern governments, such as the United States of America, give the right to vote to almost every responsible adult citizen. There were limiters on the right to vote when the US Constitution was written, and the individual states were allowed to setup their own rules governing who was allowed to vote. Women were denied the right to vote until the Nineteenth Amendment to the Constitution which was passed in 1920. In order to understand how women struggled to obtain the right to vote, some key factors must be looked at in further detail; why suffrage rights were not defined in the Constitution, the efforts that women put forth to obtain the right to vote, why there are present-day restrictions on voting, and the implications of Suffrage in current political policy.…

    • 2809 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Electoral Voting
    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of Electoral Voting

    The government should consider using popular voting instead of electoral voting to give the people a chance to receive the candidate that is chosen. According to Fitrakis and Wasserman, the political system often takes away the rights of minorities during the election (12). In the recent election, the democratic candidate lost due to the thousands of electoral votes that overpowered the popular votes. “Clinton is the sixth presidential candidate to win a legitimate majority but lose the presidency”. In 2013 Americans came together to make a petition to end electoral votes, but the electoral voting system is still the same. The cause of Americans like African American, Hispanics, Asians, etc. losing their right to vote was due to Jim Crow laws…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics