Preview

Rationalism Exam

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
472 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rationalism Exam
1.What is epistemology and why does it matter?

Epistemology is the study of knowledge. It matters because without a firm foundation for knowledge, every academic endeaver begins to collapse.

3. What is Rationalism?

Rationalism is the part of philosophy that our foundation for knowledge is found within reason.

4. Who are the three main Rationalists and where did they come from?

Rene Descartes, Baruch Spinoza, Gottfried Leibniz. Descartes was French and from the Dutch Republic. Spinoza was Jewish-Dutch, from Amsterdam. As for Leibniz, is German and was born in Leipzig, Saxony.

5. Peter Unger uses a hypothetical situation in his essay “A Defense of Skepticism.” That is similar to the one used by Descartes. Briefly state the situation and explain how Unger’s is slightly different then Descartes.

Unger had an aim in his essay to argue how we know very little, regardless of if there is much we could correctly and reasonably believe. Peter Unger had a different strategy than Descartes in his essay, such as given facts about our language explaining why it's useful to state his argument, and he also explains why we usually won't know any of what we say.

6. What are two specific reasons described by Descartes in Meditations, that cause him cause to abandon his long held assumptions?

In his first Meditation, he describes that our ordinary experience of the world cannot guarantee a good foundation on which all knowledge is based upon. His second Meditation begins with Descartes wondering if there really is anything that we can know. He notices problem with our senses; optical illusions. He continues doubting the credibility of his senses by noting that we perceive distant objects to be smaller than they really are.

7. What is Descartes’ most famous conclusion, and why does it make him a rationalist?
"I think, therefore I am." is his most famous conclusion. This makes him a rationalist because he has rationalized this thought, and has come

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Rene Descartes has revolutionized the way of philosophy to focus about the nature of being. The two methods in his first work “Discourse on Method” changed philosopher’s focus on the questions of knowing and put aside the questions of being. Method of inquiry advises that you approach questions in an orderly fashion. Also the Method of doubt tells us not to acknowledge anything unless you identify it to be true. Both methods will aid on moving from one truth to another and gain a better understanding of knowledge.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rationalism claims that we can have synthetic a priori knowledge of how things are outside the mind.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2. Identify and describe the three arguments Descartes employs to call into doubt our beliefs about reality.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [ 7 ]. A VIEW OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES, The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, Vol. 18, No. E. H. (Penn State University PressStable 3 July, 1884),p.g 230…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    "Give a detailed account of Descartes ' systematic doubt or methodical doubt in Meditation 1, making it certain that you distinguish between real doubts and so called hypothetical/metaphysical doubts. Then, explain in detail, exactly how Descartes dispels each and every one of these doubts during the course of the subsequent Meditations beginning with the cogito. Do you think that Descartes has been completely successful? Explain."The main goal of Descartes in Meditations on First Philosophy was to find truth behind all of his beliefs in order to build a solid foundation of certainty, and to focus his beliefs strictly on his idea of certainty; essentially to question knowledge. Descartes beliefs are mainly based on the theory that, if someone thinks that they really know something, they must be correct. Descartes meditations bring…

    • 3392 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stuart, M., (1999). Descartes Extended Substance. New Essay on the Rationalists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Having a belief that all questions have a scientific or mathematical answer; Rene Descartes in his search for solutions used principles that were already known and sets out to establish specific knowledge or truths. One of his most startling revelations is outlined in his writing “Discourse on the Method IV.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Garber on Descartes

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Bibliography: Garber, Daniel. "Descartes Against His Teachers: The Refutation of Hylomorphism."Descartes ' Metaphysical Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1992. 94-111. Print.…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Philosophy Study Guide

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages

    2. Explain the steps by which Descartes (in Meditation 1) seeks to bring all his beliefs into doubt, what can be doubted at each step and why, and the purpose for doing so.…

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes v Hume

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In Meditation I, Descartes reflects on his past beliefs and realizes how so much that he once believed to be true was actually false. To separate what is truth from fiction; Descartes decided to completely reject anything which he can doubt at all. He wrote, “If I am able to find in each some reason to doubt, this will suffice to justify my rejecting the whole” (Descartes 4). The belief that inspired this method was that genuine truth was clear and distinct and that any doubt whatsoever could not provide absolute certainty. In essence, if any component of something was in the very least questionable, then any conclusion drawn from it would be at the most questionable. This method led Descartes to doubt practically everything he once believed, especially knowledge attained through the senses. He wrote, “All that up to the present time I have accepted as most true and…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The First Meditation opens with Renee Descartes reflecting on all the things that he has been mistaken about, and all his beliefs that were built on those false ones. As a result, he somehow feels the need to reexamine everything he has believed in the past, and has set aside some time in front of the fireplace to do it. Renee Descartes claims him self to be "The Meditator" and decides that in order to determine truth from falsity he should declare something false if there is any reason at all for doubt. "For this reason it will suffice for the rejection of all these opinions, if I find in each of them some reason for doubt." So with this in mind, Descartes attempts to probe everything skeptically. "Nor therefore need I survey each opinion individually, a task that would be endless. Rather, because undermining the foundations will cause whatever has been built upon them to crumble of its own accord, I will attack straightaway these principles which supported everything I once believed." He realizes that everything he has come to believe has been a result of his senses telling him that something exists. "Surely whatever I had admitted until now as most true I received either from the senses or through the senses. However, I have noticed that the senses are sometimes deceptive." But the senses, like the senses of insane people, can deceive you, as can dreams. There are "no definitive signs by which to distinguish being awake from being asleep".…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes, René; Moriarty, Michael , Meditations on First Philosophy : with Selections from the Objections and Replies, Oxford University Press, 2008…

    • 1597 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    After this doubt Descartes reasons that rather than a Deity, it is an evil demon that deceives him. Here he starts to doubt things such as the sky, air, Earth, colors, figures, and sounds. He attributes these to being mere illusions of dreams. By the end of Meditation one, Descartes has doubted his senses, his prospect of reality, God, and an evil demon. All of these things lead him back to where he started at the beginning of his writing. He even states himself that he has “fallen back into the train of my former beliefs.” With this, Descartes has chosen to retreat back under his personal blanket of ignorant…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    René Descartes begins his first meditation by calling all our current beliefs to suspicion. His purpose of this practice was to stripe away all the falsehoods that we have acquired since childhood by the use of our senses. He also wanted to build anew a stable foundation of beliefs that he can be certain are of undeniably truths.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Holding that reality itself has an inherently logical structure, the rationalist asserts that a class of truths exists that the intellect can grasp directly.”…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays