Preview

Descartes Meditation 1 Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
482 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Descartes Meditation 1 Analysis
Meditation 1 Summary In Meditation one, Descartes initially writes about a blanket of ignorance that he feels he’s been trapped under for his entire life up until this point. He says “I had accepted, even from my youth, many false opinions for true.” With this statement, Descartes decides to do a spring cleaning of sorts of all his beliefs that he has reason to doubt. He makes a point to mention though, that not all of his beliefs are false or able to be refuted. The first doubt that Descartes highlights is that of his senses. He says that all of the information he has received has been through his senses and that sometimes his senses mislead him. Descartes is sure in his existence. To him, this is impossible to doubt and he justifies this …show more content…
He states that whether he is awake or asleep, “it remains true that two and three make five, and that a square has but four sides.” From his perspective, these truths are so evident that they could never fall under suspicion. God is the next doubt that Descartes brings to attention. He says that he is constantly deceived and God must have created him to be subject to this occasional deception. This doubt is quickly dispersed however when Descartes reasons that God is good and therefore would not deceive him because that would be contrary to his goodness. After this doubt Descartes reasons that rather than a Deity, it is an evil demon that deceives him. Here he starts to doubt things such as the sky, air, Earth, colors, figures, and sounds. He attributes these to being mere illusions of dreams. By the end of Meditation one, Descartes has doubted his senses, his prospect of reality, God, and an evil demon. All of these things lead him back to where he started at the beginning of his writing. He even states himself that he has “fallen back into the train of my former beliefs.” With this, Descartes has chosen to retreat back under his personal blanket of ignorant

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    We might question the certitude of the Method of Doubt, but his arguments are accurate and conclusive, but he presents sufficient evidence to call his senses into doubt. I think that Descartes does indeed succeed in giving good reasons for doubting his senses. The sensory system cannot be fully relied on, because it is not a controlled variable, and therefore the accuracy can be questioned. This flaw is due to the fact that the sensory system can be influenced by internal and external factors. Descartes gives the reason that our senses are not reliable when it comes to far and distant objects is a good reason because it is self-explanatory in the sense that human eyesight is limited and therefore, our senses may confuse these objects. Therefore, we have proof that trusting our senses is not…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes’ arguments for his methods of doubt were things may not be as they seem based on the perception of our senses may be skewed, our dreams may lead us to believe that what we dreamed might be real and that what we know as God may be false or that God may be a demon instead.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes sets out on a mission to guarantee that every one of his beliefs is certain without any doubt. He considers that he should free himself of all false learning keeping in mind the end goal is to acquire any genuine information. Descartes chooses to question all that he has learned from truth in the past. He will depend on his thinking capacity to reconstruct his own particular knowledge, starting with a foundation of things which he is most sure about. Descartes declines to acknowledge anything that has any hint of doubt. His purpose behind doing such is because he genuinely trusts this is the best way to find the practical presence of something that cannot be questioned. Descartes uses a strategy in his endeavor to obtain information.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Meditator is alone, no trees, no people, no oceans, no mountains, no earth, no moon; just him and his isolation. In “Meditation Three”, Descartes goes much deeper than just his famous philosophical ideal — if “one can think one can be”(Descartes 19). He goes on to explain how there must be a God. He states that if there was not a God, people would have created themselves. If this were to be true, everyone would create themselves as perfect people. Descartes believes that there must be a God. God created humans and other humans and other objects to allow humans to think. This human ability to think allows them to exist. If nothing else were to exist and the Meditator was alone in the universe then he could not think and without thought,…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    René Descartes contention in the Second Meditation Descartes rejects the proof of the senses as unreliable for certainty. His fundamental contentions depend on the psyche and body are particular and unmistakable and the movement that characterizes his presence is that of considering. Proceeding with his inquiry, he endeavors to discover something of which he can be certain beyond a shadow of a doubt - regardless of the fact that it is the reality that nothing is certain. His first port of call is to attempt to discover who is in charge of the discernments he gets through his detects. It might be God, a threatening evil spirit, or even Descartes himself who is capable. Indeed, even in the most dire outcome imaginable of the harmful evil presence, notwithstanding, Rene Descartes is guaranteed of one truth: so as to be tricked, the thing beguiled…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This resulted in an overwhelming confusion where truth was hidden behind weakly formed concepts. Primarily, he sought to avoid these issues through geometry, as he trusted the propositions that made up a geometrical theorem were not exposed to doubt. This ultimately meant that anything deriving from these propositions would also be unexposed to doubt and therefore absolute certainties. Yet this argument was completely torn apart by radical skepticism, leading him to write the First Meditation, where he attempts to show the possibility of knowledge even when it derives from the most skeptic ideas. The first idea introduced in his work is one that claims false all of our sensory knowledge. Descartes argues that most of his dreams have extremely realistic components and therefore sensory knowledge can come from real sensations as well as false ones that are found in dreams. Since there is no way of differentiating these sensations, every belief that is based on them can be doubted. However, this is not valid for mathematical beliefs, as “for whether [he is] awake or dreaming, it remains true that two and three make five, and that a square has but four sides” (Descartes, oregonstate). Eventually, Descartes starts to wonder whether God could deceive him by making him believe in false…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “I will eliminate from those beliefs anything that could be slightly called into question by the arguments I have been using, which will leave me with only beliefs about myself that are certain and unshakeable” (Descartes 4). This statement represents the method of Descartes’ questioning if anything is real, and even if he himself exists. As Descartes assesses himself, he is not able to define who he is. He concludes that since he is deceived, he has to find something that is certain to him. He then figures out that if he is capable of getting tricked, then he exists.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes Cogito Argument

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Since he could not come up with reasonable solutions with valid support, he pauses that line of questioning. “I am forced to admit that nothing that I used to believe is beyond legitimate doubt—not because I have been careless or playful, but because I have valid and well-considered grounds for doubt” (p. 322). Descartes rationalizes that the idea that God is deceiving him is unstable because it contains a series of doubts—such as God is said to be supremely good but being deceitful goes against that very idea—that indicate instability. From this reasoning, he acquires another possible answer which outlines that he is in fact being deceived, not by God, but by a demon whose task is to mislead him. While this argument does show rationality, Descartes claims that he is not capable of knowing if it is the truth.…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    René Descartes begins his first meditation by calling all our current beliefs to suspicion. His purpose of this practice was to stripe away all the falsehoods that we have acquired since childhood by the use of our senses. He also wanted to build anew a stable foundation of beliefs that he can be certain are of undeniably truths.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes ' Meditation III provides a causal and cosmological argument that God exists. Having used the Method of Doubt in Meditations I and II in order to reject his false beliefs, Descartes assumes that the only things he knows at this point are the conclusions reached at Meditations I and II. Having also doubted judgements in arithmetic and geometry because of the possibility of the existence of an evil demon, Descartes wishes to find out if there is a God, and if so, is this God deceitful? If He is good, then it would follow that mathematics and simple natures could be reinstated. In order to disprove the evil demon hypothesis, Descartes examines the different degrees of reality in things in comparison to God. Descartes ' idea of God is of an infinite substance. The idea of infinite substances cannot be caused by a finite substance, but only by another infinite substance, such as God himself. Therefore Descartes concludes that God as an infinite substance exists. Several criticisms can be made concerning Meditation III. It is arguable that Descartes ' causal proof does not leave room for simple religious faith. There are also other flaws in his proof of the existence of God, which will be discussed later in this essay.…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes First Meditation

    • 2099 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Descartes believes that knowledge comes from within the mind, a single indisputable fact to build on that can be gained through individual reflection. While seeking true knowledge, Descartes writes his Six Meditations. In these meditations, Descartes tries to develop a strong foundation, which all knowledge can be built upon. In the First Meditation, Descartes begins developing this foundation through the method of doubt. He casts doubt upon all his previous beliefs, including "matters which are not entirely certain and indubitable [and] those which appear to be manifestly false." (Descartes, p.75, par.3) Once Descartes clears away all beliefs that can be called into doubt, he can then build a strong base for all true knowledge to stand upon. Descartes attacks all his previous beliefs by going to the root of their origin, the senses and intellect. He then supposes to say that everything he presumed to be absolutely true, such as simple arithmetic, was created by an evil demon.…

    • 2099 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He imagined that some evil genius leads him astray and that there is nothing that he can be considered valid: neither his own existence nor the existence of the external world or the existence of God. Descartes believed that, since feelings deceive us, we must assume that there is no a single thing, that would be the way it seems to us. He asked whether there is a difference between dreams and our perception of reality in the waking state. He skillfully argued that his state of doubt is the only thing he can not doubt, not falling into contradiction. Since the doubt is a form of thinking, he exists as a thinking being.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Method of Doubt

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Descartes method of doubt focuses on becoming a skeptic of every thought in which he employs any doubt. His method for doubting follows as such, firstly that he will regard any belief as false if he can craft a doubt for it because all thoughts were formed from a possibly false previous one. As humans we’ve all formed ideas by our senses that simply are not true. It is possible that our senses are constantly telling us the wrong thing, these senses which we will build yet another idea from. Descartes assumes that it is reliable, when searching for true knowledge, to conclude that any principle that is obtained from our senses is false. His doubts are furthered by the trickery of the content of our dreams, which is assembled and often mimics features we encounter throughout our lives. It is possible that our perceptions in which we establish a belief on was conjured while dreaming. However there are certain truths in sciences that whether asleep or awake are constantly genuine so in order to completely start at a base point in our beliefs must also take in the role of an omnipotent creator. God has the capability of to manipulate our perceived experiences, and to…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fifth meditation starts off by Descartes straying away from meditating on the aspects of himself and God and compelling himself to focus on what he was pondering on a few days ago: material things. But before Descartes tries to reason if material things outside himself exist, he must first make sure material things can be definite outside his thoughts without being subjected to doubtfulness. Other than that, anything outside these parameters has to be omitted and seen as distractions from what he is trying to ponder on. He has to understand the difference between the material things that are definite and the material things that are ambiguous or bring about doubt and being deceived through the senses. Descartes first has to audit his…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As he becomes more and more skeptical, he begins doubting his initial beliefs regarding logic and mathematics. Unlike his arguments against dreams, two plus three always equals five and a square always has four sides, no matter what state he is in (Meditation One, 61). Descartes’ main argument of deceiver god is his worst-case scenario, in his most skeptical state. Descartes proposes a belief that there is an all knowing being who is trying to trick us. He then goes on to realize that if this is the case, we cannot even be sure if mathematics and logic are true. But if the idea of a deceiver god is accurate, then even the strongest foundation of knowledge will be proven unstable, as that foundation would be a deceiver god feeding false thoughts. Descartes finally comes to the conclusion that if there is no greater being, we are created imperfectly, which means our thinking and rationality can in no way be trustworthy or worthwhile. He chooses to believe in neither the dream argument, nor the deceiver…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays