In recent years the topic of college football players being paid has been widely discussed, but in reality the fact that this is even a discussion is just ridiculous. College football isn't a job, it is an extracurricular activity students can take part in while in college. Behind this common idea is college football players already are being seen as more privileged and that is not fair to other students and paying college football players will increase that perception. Also if the college football players were paid there must be an organized plan in terms of the pay structure it would it be fairly determined in terms of how to pay the football players and seeing if certain players get paid more than others. Most importantly is the immaturity…
College football players shouldn't get paid because players receive scholarships for tuition.According to Christian “ While he was still with West Virginia as athletic director, he made it clear that more funding was needed for scholarships. While he may not support paying players directly”(Christian 1) .Colleges offer scholarships for students to play football that are wonderful players and they should not need anymore money. When students receive their scholarships they are already at the college of their choice. Christian states…
Over 240,000 College Athletes are affected by the law that prevents college athletes from getting paid (NCAA). "Everyone is making money off them except them,"(Reshke).“The United States is a sports-obsessed nation, and National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) football and basketball contests are some of the most widely viewed, highly rated, heavily bet on, and highly profitable sporting events in the country,” (Garcia). College athletes fail to get paid, they always put their health at risk when playing, and the sport takes up extra time used for jobs. This gets in the way, and the students can’t afford to buy food, rent, etc. College athletes should get paid, some sports make incredible amounts of money off of tickets, and online programs.…
The NCAA (National Collegiate Association of Athletics) has many different rules and restrictions for Division 1 student athletes. A lot of these rules are controversial because of some of the NCAA 's own actions. Every year, many student athletes get either suspended or kicked off teams for disorderly conduct, or not abiding by the rules set by the NCAA. The NCAA is, and always has been, sternly against any student athletes receiving any type of profit for anything, unless they are working for it. Along with this, student athletes are not permitted too ever accept any money for participating in a college sport, and if they do this is a major violation and they will have consequences for breaking these rules.…
To understand the problem of selecting a national champion in college football, one must first understand the system responsible for awarding teams the right to play in the National Championship. The system is called the BCS, or “Bowl Championship Series”. It was implemented in 1998 with one main goal in mind which is to pick the two best college football teams to play in the big game. Before 1998, the national champion was determined by vote through coaches and media experts. Now, the BCS uses computers and poll data to set the stage for the championship game. A lot of debate has been brought to attention of…
In college football, the BCS system has been around since 1998 and has become well established. The BCS system is well established but has accumulated much criticism over the years due to inefficiencies with the system. Like history shows, as time passes, people find better and more efficient ways to do things. In this case, a large percentage of college football fans would like to see college football take on a playoff system versus the traditional BCS system. According to collegefootball.procon.org, 85% of college football fans support changing to a playoff system, according to a 2007 Gallup Poll. The BCS system has been great and has had a good run but based on the results, the fans are ready for a change.…
If colleges were to pay athletes there would be no fair way to distribute the money. Athletes perform their sport at different levels of ability and for various lengths of time. In addition, not every player is able to compete in a game. Problems would arise about the athlete not playing which would not allow for him/her to receive the money they deserve. The first issue about this problem is that some people believe that athletes should be paid based on an open market system. This idea of an open market system would allow for supply and demand to come into play. In addition, a school would be able to pay their scouted athlete based on the money that comes in because of their ability. However, The payment would vary depending on the market along with the deals that each athlete has with the school. The second issue is about the colleges because not every college can afford the players they want to recruit. In 2013 the NCAA had an investigation on the economic stability of Division 1 sport programs. This study showed that out of 288 Division 1 schools only 23 were running their programs in a profitable way. This means that only those 23 schools had the money to pay a college athlete. In our society, any business not profiting from anything is likely not hiring, and there is no idea…
The football/basketball coach is the highest paid employee at most private and public universities. The maneuvering to pay large amounts of compensation to the coaches via ‘booster organizations’ if there is a State government cap at a public university Not to mention, each bowl game is sponsored by a different company such as AT&T, PlayStation, Chick-Fil-A, etc. The College playoff committee states “A conference will receive $6 million for each team that is selected for the semifinal games. There will be no additional distribution to conferences whose teams qualify for the national championship game. A conference will receive $4 million for each team that plays in a non-playoff bowl under the arrangement (in 2014-2015, the Cotton, Fiesta and Peach Bowls).” In other words, each conference is rewarded for each team that makes the semifinal games. Of course, the athletes themselves receive no compensation it’s only fair right. In an article in the New York Times Magazine “ Let’s Start Paying College Athletes” by Joe Nocera, Nocera himself writes “The hypocrisy that permeates big-money college sports takes your breath away. College football and men’s basketball have become such huge commercial enterprises that together they generate more than $6 billion in annual revenue, more than the National Basketball Association.” Nocera’s point is that the NCAA makes more money than its professional counterpart, none other than the National Basketball Association (NBA) and arguably the most important asset gets paid nothing. The business wouldn’t exist without them. Picture the movie and television industries with the actors/actresses prohibited from making any money. Or everyone in the hospital except the surgeon. In short, the athletes are participating in an industry, in a business…
According to the article Jalen Rose describes reasons why the college players should be paid to play. This isn’t the first time that this has come up before, but it seems to have more steam every time it comes up in a conversation. There’s always going to have someone like Cam Newton that receives money improperly. Each college athlete should be paid a stipend of $2000.00 per semester. All the college athletes’ coaches and the schools they go to, but they are the ones that get the money and the athletes don’t get any of the money. They treat these college athletes like servants. They can’t have even a part-time…
For example, the University of Arizona just went through a big time scandal involving paying college athletes. One recruiting tactic used by tons of colleges is paying or bribing athletes to come to their school with cash or tangible items. These colleges get in tons of trouble and the players do as well. They usually use these tactics on poor recruits and these athletes receive pressure from their families to accept the offering. To help their family financially they accept the offer from a college and most of the time it goes unnoticed, but when these athletes get caught the consequences are tremendous. The athlete at Arizona had his reputation tarnished and his NBA dreams were crushed as well; all because he was trying to help out his family and did not want to struggle financially. So obviously under the table there are transactions happening and I feel that if the NCAA made paying college athletes legal less programs would get in trouble and the NCAA would no longer be corrupt. This would also make the NCAA more balanced because the bigger programs with more excess money would not be able to sway athletes with all this extra money. There are a ton of solutions to this problem, they could just make this bribing legal, they could make a salary system, or some kind of reward system for players. If a college were to make a salary based system for their college athletes it should be a single base salary only because every program spends roughly the same amount of time putting in tons of work even if they do not bring in as much money. If the NCAA were to make a stipend system along with commissions I feel that would be the best option. These players could receive commissions for jersey sales and possibly have some type of reward system that goes along with some kind of base salary so that athletes that do not play a lot are still able to…
The article “Want to clean up college athletics? Pay the players.” the author, Ryan Swanson explains the unlikeness of paying college players, but explains the benefits of paying college students who are playing sports in college. Ryan explains that some coaches want to pay the players for more motivation and so they can keep themselves financially safe and to pay for tuition, an example would be in 1980 Southern Methodist University had illicitly paid their football players, another example would be the University of Kentucky which they had lured in Chris Mills by having 1,000 dollars of cash in transit. Which none of these events had led to a change in the NCAA model. Swanson believes that paid athletes who gain revenue require them to take money out of their own wallet, meaning the money they recieve will result in less money for the colleges and the idea of paying college athletes is actually really old. In 1905 Harper's magazine published an editorial called “Pay of College Athletes.” which was quoted “How to make athletes work for nothing” which helps Swanson's claim of no money=no motive. There is a workaround of course to…
Money gives food, money gives water, money gives life, but money is not given to collegiate football athletes. The National Collegiate Athletic Association, NCAA, made a billion dollars on the games during March Madness and even after the nets were cut and a champion was crowned not a single player was give any money. Collegiate football players, or any collegiate player for that matter, should be paid for each game based on how hard they work and how dedicated they are to their sport. The athletes are the basis and the main reason the NCAA makes their millions. In addition, it can give these athletes a financial education and better prepare them for their future. Money is the reason people thrive.…
The notion of paying college football players has been an ongoing debate since the early 1900’s. With current television revenue resulting from NCAA football bowl games and March Madness in basketball, there is now a clamoring for compensating both football and basketball players beyond that of an athletic scholarship.…
Throughout the years, many colleges have dealt with much controversy over whether or not athletes should be paid additionally to play sports in college. There are strong arguments supporting both sides of this issue. I believe there is validity for both sides of this argument. However, through research I have done it is my belief that it is dangerous to pay college athletes in addition to their scholarships. Paying college athletes would be harmful for everyone involved, especially for the student athletes themselves.…
$53.4 Million the combined salary of the top 15 paid coaches in division 1 college football, $0 the combined salary of all student-athletes. Over the past few decades, college athletics have gained popularity across the United States. Whether it is football, basketball, or baseball, ever since the turn of the century, intercollegiate sports have brought in a surplus of revenue to their respective Universities. A recent study found that the University of Texas’ Athletic Program had the highest revenue of any other University at a little over $120 million. Yet with this large sum of money, NO college athletes are legally compensated for their work. According to NCAA rules, “You are not eligible for participation in a sport if you have ever: Taken pay or the promise of pay, for competing in that sport”. While it may seem odd and unjust to pay college athletes, the reality is that compensation of such athletes is a necessity not only to keep competition at a steady level in college athletics, but also to encourage students to graduate and get their college degrees.…
