Preview

Want To Clean Up College Athletes Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
802 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Want To Clean Up College Athletes Analysis
The article “Want to clean up college athletics? Pay the players.” the author, Ryan Swanson explains the unlikeness of paying college players, but explains the benefits of paying college students who are playing sports in college. Ryan explains that some coaches want to pay the players for more motivation and so they can keep themselves financially safe and to pay for tuition, an example would be in 1980 Southern Methodist University had illicitly paid their football players, another example would be the University of Kentucky which they had lured in Chris Mills by having 1,000 dollars of cash in transit. Which none of these events had led to a change in the NCAA model. Swanson believes that paid athletes who gain revenue require them to take money out of their own wallet, meaning the money they recieve will result in less money for the colleges and the idea of paying college athletes is actually really old. In 1905 Harper's magazine published an editorial called “Pay of College Athletes.” which was quoted “How to make athletes work for nothing” which helps Swanson's claim of no money=no motive. There is a workaround of course to …show more content…
Swanson uses several colleges and dates to support his message, “History tells us that we’ll continue to talk about this problem. We’ll debate about it. We’ll write about it. We’ll even argue about it. And then things will die down, and we’ll go back to the way it has always been,” some coaches have tried to pay students for more motivation, to lure in outstanding athletes, and even resulted in using sex and alcohol. An example would be in 2004, University Of Colorado had tried to lure in Athletes with sex and alcohol to encourage students to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    “The college sports industry generates $11 billion in annual revenues. Fifty colleges report annual revenues that exceed $50 million. Meanwhile, five colleges report annual revenues that exceed $100 million,” (Mitchell & Edelman). The money collected by the NCAA, goes towards the sports and the programs, not the players themselves, however, the NCAA says that “Student-athletes are at the heart of the NCAA’s mission,” (NCAA). “Some athletes and their supporters believe that college athletes deserve some type of financial payment for their services and contributions to their institutions, an opinion that has lead to player-initiated lawsuits, court cases, and strikes,” (Garcia).…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “Here’s Why We Shouldn’t Pay College Athletes” by John Thelin, it discusses the topic of paying collegiate athletes getting paid. Thelin takes the position that college athletes should not be getting paid. Thelin does agree with scholarships. During the article Thelin explains why college players shouldn’t be getting paid, using numbers that show if they were to legally get paid they would end up only making in the hundreds of dollars and would cost more to the school than just giving scholarships. I agreed with “Here’s Why We Shouldn’t Pay College Athletes” because it benefits no one even the players.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “...Is money such a big problem for these student-athletes? Don't they receive scholarships? How much more money do they need?” Most college athletes received scholarships to play for the college they’re going to. They should not receive money for going to school and choosing to play a sport that they don’t have to do. Sports is always an option, no one has to play and no coach is going to force a student to play a sport and maybe cause a distraction from doing their school work.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the essay “The Shame of College Sports” Taylor Branch explains a large amount of corruption inside college sports and makes a case that colleges do not properly represent their student athletes and they should be paid.(Branch 227) One of the statements from UNC trustee Dan Curtis states “I think we should pay these guys something” sets up Branch to one of his first major statements in which he says “Fans and educators alike recoil from this proposal as though from original sin. Amateurism is the whole point, they say. Paid athletes would destroy the integrity and appeal of college sports.” (227) In this move he confronts what the vast majority of people believe and later goes on to further his view of the topic with an analogy of college…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    With March Madness dominating the headlines and airwaves, it’s difficult not to admire the passion and effort of these nineteen year old athletes. However, while the marketing of, and revenue from, the tournament continues to grow for the television networks, the NCAA, the participating universities and their coaches, the NCAA athletes participating in it are expressly prohibited from collecting any financial compensation at all whatsoever. There is the argument that NCAA student-athletes should not be paid because of an opportunity provided to pursue a free higher education not given to the general public; but the assertion has several flaws, not the least of which is the extensive time and energy demanded…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The single most debated topic when it comes to compensating student-athletes concerns whether student athletes should be paid beyond the full cost of attending school. The pay for play doctrine, in which athletes would earn a portion of the revenue they help generate, is a highly controversial topic that has become more popular in recent years. The arguments in favor of pay for play originate from the fact that the players are the reason why the NCAA is able to make television contracts. These contracts include $11 billion over 14 years just for the television rights to March Madness. Without the players of different sports and genders, the NCAA…

    • 1746 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the article Jalen Rose describes reasons why the college players should be paid to play. This isn’t the first time that this has come up before, but it seems to have more steam every time it comes up in a conversation. There’s always going to have someone like Cam Newton that receives money improperly. Each college athlete should be paid a stipend of $2000.00 per semester. All the college athletes’ coaches and the schools they go to, but they are the ones that get the money and the athletes don’t get any of the money. They treat these college athletes like servants. They can’t have even a part-time…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "College Athletes for Hire, The Evolution and Legacy of the NCAA's Amateur Myth" written by Allen L. Sack and Ellen J. Staurowsky. In their book, the authors enlighten the reader on such issues as athletic scholarships, professionalism in college sports, and favoritism for athletes as well as many more important legal, and ethical issues that we as a country need to address. In this paper I will not do a standard book report by simply regurgitating the information I read in their book. Instead I will try my best to give you my opinion of the issues previously mentioned, and finally what the authors feel should be done to remedy this dilemma as well as my own opinion on the matter, but first I will discuss the issues involved in athletic scholarships.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some colleges make more money than others. This graph shows the schools with the most profit in their sports programs. Somebody could say that the athletes bring in an enormous amount of money. According to Jeff Dorfman, a professor of Economics at the University of Georgia, only a few collegiate sports actually bring in money. Therefore, an athlete in a sport that isn’t very profitable wouldn’t make nearly get as much as an athlete in a very profitable sport. Along with the sports being very profitable they also have to pay for an even larger variety of different things. Student athletes should not be paid because of the money that would be paid to them. The money that they would be paid could be used to advance other things in the university such as better libraries, science labs, fixing up the dorms, or even improving their athletic facilities. Although the athletes put a lot of time into their schooling and sports the benefits they are given is equal to what they are giving and being…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    College Athletes are basically being used by the NCAA and all the NCAA is thinking of ways why student athletes should not be paid. In the article for the case for paying college athletes it basically explains the reason why the NCAA haven’t decided to give athletes any type of…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The NCAA manages everything in college sports, and is considered a non-profit organization, all of the money they make is redistributed to the colleges that are part of the NCAA. Just football, and basketball generates 6 billion dollars a year, and not one penny of that money would've been made if it were not for the student athletes. In "Pay To Play: Should College Athletes Be Paid?," Adele Birkenes and Akash Bagaria who have written six articles about student life states "It is only reasonable that student athletes have a share in the millions of dollars that their sports businesses bring in." The statements by the authors bring to light this one simple question, why can the athletes be rewarded for making the NCAA and colleges successful? Although paying college athletes is not an easy decision for the people in charge, many support paying student athletes. There has been many proposals dating back to the 1950's, but there are five proposals that have a very good chance of getting passed, and used. In the article "Point/Counterpoint: Paying College Athletes," Dennis Johnson states "...former NCAA President Miles Brand's suggestion and allocate athletes include a $2,000-$3,000 cost of living increase to full scholarships...This would provide the athletes with the needed income for clothes, laundry, sundries, travel,…

    • 1883 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many would also say that college sports exist not to make a profit, but to create a community between the different universities. Throwing money at the players would change the mindset of the players making them think as if they are professional players, changing the amateur status. Another big problem with this is, not every college sport is considered as popular as football and basketball. “It’s unfair and wrong to pay football and men’s basketball players because they participate in a sport that generates millions of dollars in revenue but does not pay the thousands upon thousands of student-athletes competing for their schools in other sports” (College athletes shouldn’t get paid). Will all college athletes be given a paycheck? “There is no system of payment that can be put in place that is fair across the board for all students, all sports and all schools that participate in college athletics” (Jackson). These things can only result in…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sack, Allen L., and Ellen J. Staurowsky. College Athletes For Hire: The Evolution And Legacy Of The NCAA’s Amateur Myth. Praeger, 1998. EBook Collection (EBSCOhost). Web. 18 June 2012.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Some fans do not want the players to be paid because they feel that the true meaning of being a college athlete would be tarnished. A large majority of people oppose paying the athletes because they see them as students (Alex Prewitt). Also, fans want the “amatuer” label to matter (Dom Amore). Spectators believe that the players could let the money affect their game (Adriano Valente). Student-Athletes could let all the money get the best of them which would lead them to forget the reason why they are playing in college (Adriano Valente). Their youth might cause them to make impulsive decisions as well. For example, former NFL first round draft pick, Travis Taylor, spent $40,000 in a furniture store after he received his first rookie paycheck (Tom Farrey). Athletes have a history of wasting their money by spending it on items that distract them from their sport. Young athletes are already prone to making bad choices, giving them money could make their choices lead to severe consequences. However, paying the athletes would help the college and the athlete. Paying college athletes now is the right thing to do because it will give those who fail to be…

    • 1693 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    But in 1948 the NCAA adopted a code that limited financial aid for athletes to tuition and fees. The NCAA has said before and they’ll say it again, they will not pay college athletes. The NCAA is who would make the decision. So it might slightly matter what the athletes have to say about being paid but it is completely their decision. The NCAA is a non-profit. So they would not be able to pay the players so the colleges would be the ones having to pay them, But colleges can’t afford to pay their players. And the colleges have to keep the stadium and or gym clean and renovate it every so often. And players are expecting to get paid? But they NCAA did come up with a compromise, since they would not pay the athletes for playing, they said that they would raise scholarships to cover full college…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays