Preview

Morality Of Total War Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1463 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Morality Of Total War Analysis
War is never an easy discussion; it is a subject people constantly debate, especially in regards to total war. Questioning the morality of total war is an issue due to the elasticity of the definition, which is dependent upon the individual. General William T. Sherman’s total war strategy in Georgia and the Carolinas is arguably morally acceptable -even though it included waging war against the civilian population- when taking into account the benefits versus the costs. There were excessive actions taken by Sherman’s soldiers, which stemmed from their prejudices towards the southern population. However, as a result of Sherman’s plan the war ended in a swift victory for the North. The justification and by association the morality of total war …show more content…
The Union soldiers understood the importance of weakening the Confederate economy; even slaves suffered the plundering of their goods and as a resource themselves were freed. That was a double edge sword, the freeing of slaves was in opposition to southern lifestyle and the South took a financial blow they could ill afford if they desired to continue financing the war. Soldiers focused on ravishing the land for goods, less so in taking advantage of women. Women were in a perilous position, but it revolved around hunger and destitution as a direct result of the ravishing. A driving force in the war had been southern belles; they encouraged the men in their lives to enlist and supported them by sending in supplies, which ceased because of Sherman’s …show more content…
April 12, 1861 marked the beginning of the Civil War when shots were fired at Fort Sumter, February 17, 1865 Fort Sumter and Charleston were abandoned by Confederate troops. Sherman’s troops were in enemy territory, the plan always was to wreak havoc in order to expedite the conclusion of the war, especially in South Carolina, which initiated secession. Morally speaking it was a necessary evil to end the bloodshed, the warring of one nation, and return peace to the country and the families it separated, it provided closure to one of the darkest moments in American history. Valueless Confederate money was burned as if it were firewood, rations were scarce and what was available was pathetic, Confederates states were unwilling to aid one another due to a mindset of pro state government versus anti federal government, the Confederacy was falling apart, and Sherman gave it the final push it needed. Total war was an effort for peace, which required “make[ing] war so terrible… and make them so sick of war that generations would pass away before they would again appeal to it.” It was a debated idea Sherman would either succeed and leave behind a legacy of brilliance, or be written off as a foolish military

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Sherman’s March was a march lead by General William T. Sherman. During this march he lead 100,000 soldiers from Tennessee to Atlanta , Georgia. The purpose of Sherman’s March was to destroy Confederate industries and railroads. This march affected the Civil War because Confederate troops now had no railroads for fast transport of troops. Also, the Confederates now had no way to make goods because the Union had destroyed their industries and factories. If this didn’t happen, the Confederates could have sent their troops through their railroads to attack the Union. This could have majorly changed the outcome of the war. The Union could have been attacked and the Confederates could have gained more land. Lincoln needed a victory from the union…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reviewing the photographs of the tactics use by General Sherman throughout the Civil War, I have come to the conclusion that nowadays his approach can be seen as excessive and immoral; however, during a time of war, such tactics might have been necessary to culminate the conflict. Moreover, in my opinion, General Sherman conviction to end the war led him to employ a technique known as the “scorched earth tactics;” such strategy can be utilized to break the enemy’s economy and wage psychological warfare on the enemy’s population. By widespread of destruction of civilian infrastructure left behind by General Sherman and the consumption of supplies in South Carolina and Georgia was an effort to stop, demoralize and deplete the Confederate…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sherman believed that the Confederacy's strategic, economic, and psychological ability to wage further war had to be definitively crushed if the fighting were to end (Buck). By using "scorched earth" tactics he decimated the south's ability to fight. This form of warfare involved winning the battles then burning the crops and plantations as they pushed south. This left the southern economy crippled and barely able to supply their armies.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sherman’s attitude to the Confederate forces was a key aspect in the result of a Union Victory. Sherman admired the Southern forces and wrote in a letter to his wife in 1864, describing the Confederate forces. “The devils seem to have a determination that cannot but be admired. No amount of poverty or adversity seems to shake their faith.” Sherman’s view on the Southern spirit would play a significant role in the way Sherman attempted to overcome these forces. Sherman’s subsequent actions after his letter to his wife accentuated his belief that severe measures were necessary to break the dogged Confederate resistance.…

    • 670 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A Woman Rice Planter

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages

    I cannot mark the passage of time exactly, but the report came that Sherman was advancing, and there came awful rumors of what he was doing and would do. We made long homespun bags, quite narrow, and with a strong waistband, and a strong button, to be worn under the skirts. And into these we put all our treasures. Things in the Confederacy were getting worse and worse. The Yankees were reported nearer and nearer. Confederate Soldiers came by the house and told us to destroy all the whisky we had. When the Yankees came everything would be seized by the enemy. After taking all they wanted they left and continued marching on, burning Columbia and leaving a trail of desolation where they passed. 1…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A review of chapter 2, 'The Crime of War' in Michael Walzer's book, "Just and Unjust Wars: A moral argument with historical illustrations." Allen Lane 1997.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Women had many roles in the Civil War. One of their main roles was at the home front. The North and the South had very different approaches given the financial differences. In the North women organized many Ladies Aid Societies. In these societies women would bake, can, and plant food that they would then send to the troops. They also made uniforms, blankets, pillows, socks, and gloves for the soldiers. Other than making food and clothes for the soldiers they raised money for medical supplies and other necessities. In total they raised about $50 million for the army. Women had to take over jobs that men had before the war. They worked at factories, schools, farms, and government offices. Some of the women also went to…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Typically, when we think of the Civil War, we think of the role of men during that time. History books reflect on the men that had fought and died in the war. While many may believe men were the only ones that contributed in the Civil War that isn't actually the case. Women also had a large impact on the outcome of this war. During the war, women took on new roles to support their families. Women were generally viewed as primary caretakers of the home and of children. Previously throughout history they didn’t usually take part in the same roles that men did. During the Civil War, women not only took on their usual roles of being in control of the home life, they actually joined in on the war…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On April 12, 1861, the Confederacy declared war against the Union because both the South and the North had different outtakes on U.S problems. The Civil War began in 1861 and ended in 1865, but along the way it caused lots of geographic changes. Although it ended four years later, many problems damaged both sides of the United States, especially the South. Southern women faced starvation and poverty when their husbands and sons, who took care of the farms, went away to war. In the South, there were many riots by women demanding for supplies to provide for their families during this time. The Union would often steal crops and livestock from the South, causing the Southerners to have no food to give to their families.…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A large sector of just war theory references several moral and legal implications that must be evaluated prior to engaging in attack. The legalist paradigm, as expressed by theorist and author Michael Walzer in his book Just and Unjust Wars1, evaluates the conditions that constitute just war, and elaborates on several of the key circumstances that are required to impose just war on others. Despite its strengths, this paradigm is often evaluated as being a “strawman”, and provides only a foundation for which several other nuanced views can expand on. One fundamental idea expressed in his claims though, is the idea that “nothing but aggression can justify war”1. Through this, Walzer establishes the only moral precedent for which a counter-attack…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The civil war is essentially a liberating war. The progress of the war promoted the changes of American social gender. The war was not only hone women; the more important thing is the women reshape hone in themselves. The female war pushed to the ranks of social production. The war called the men of southeast and northwest into the battlefield. They were separated from productive labor, and there was a vacuum in the field of social production. People they should not only…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think war is unacceptable for a number of different reasons. My first reason is the amount of civilians killed, such as when the two nuclear bombs were dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima in world war 2 and killed 350,000 innocent lives.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Is War Ethical

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The question, is war ethical, should always be the first question asked and the first question answered before engaging in such a world altering, life changing endeavor. One must be sure that purpose of war is to bring peace. “That its essential aim is always peace, so if peace is forthcoming in any guise, it is morally critical for all parties to seek a return to a permanent peace rather than a momentary lapse of war” (Moseley). Unfortunately, this is not the mindset of Falcon, one of the charters in The Sirens of Baghdad. He is militant; consumed with Thanatos and with an “appetite for destruction” (Hedges 251) towards the American troops; Falcon in the event below is determined to deceive and poison the minds of his brethren against the Americans troops.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In today's society, the possession and effective use of force is necessary. We have to recognize that we live in an imperfect world where evil seems to be an inevitablity. Our constant need for power makes the idea of a violent free world unimaginable. As long as we continue on this power hungry path the political issues will continue on this same path. Force is necessary with our current societal conditions and can be looked at as irresponsible when a nation does not prepare for the necessity of force. Any political conversation that entails the words, truth, liberty or peace run hand in hand with the use of force to create them. The perspective of some people are…

    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Morality in war

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Is war ever moral? I feel that War is a necessary part of life. Sometimes force is the only way to defend yourself or others. We are all equals, and It is immoral to take the life of anyone, but it is also immoral to let the life of anyone be taken. We have a responsibility to help each other because cooperation is the only way the human race can survive; we also have a right to defend ourselves. This means that if someone else is threatening you or anothers life, and you are capable of helping, you have an obligation to protect yourself or them.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays