Preview

Morality in war

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
959 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Morality in war
Morality in War
Is war ever moral? I feel that War is a necessary part of life. Sometimes force is the only way to defend yourself or others. We are all equals, and It is immoral to take the life of anyone, but it is also immoral to let the life of anyone be taken. We have a responsibility to help each other because cooperation is the only way the human race can survive; we also have a right to defend ourselves. This means that if someone else is threatening you or anothers life, and you are capable of helping, you have an obligation to protect yourself or them. Lethal force will never be moral, but what if it’s the only way to protect someone? Let’s say that an attacker has broken into your house and is holding a gun to you and your family. You also have a gun pointed at the assailant. In this hypothetical situation we must assume that the only way to save your family is to kill the attacker. You must make a choice to kill the attacker or let the attacker kill you and your family. Both options are immoral, so one has to ask if it's more immoral to kill the attacker, or to let the attacker kill your family? The obvious choice to me is to kill the assailant. I feel this is the right choice because of two reasons. One, our responsibility to protect ourselves and our family is larger than the responsibility to not do harm to another. The second reason has to do with the proportion of damage. The attacker would be doing more harm in killing my family and me then I would be doing in killing him. This example allows us to see, on a small scale, when lethal force is necessary. Things get more complicated when we look at entire countries rather than just one family, but my view point remains the same. Lethal force is only permitted when it is the only option to defend yourself or others. War is necessary because people sometimes make immoral decisions that put others in a position where there is no other option, but is war ever moral? Killing is always immoral, and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The Just War Theory

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages

    What justifies war? Who justifies it? Why as human beings do we feel the need to fight, harm, and kill others to achieve certain goals? These questions have been pertinent to our society since the beginning of time and continue to challenge us to better understand the human psyche, and code of ethics that give Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Coast Guardsmen, and Marines credence to kill in the name of the United States of America. These ethics of war lay the foundation for that code of understanding and righteousness for when it is justifiable to pull the trigger and take the life of another, or commit an act of war.…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The word “immoral” is defined by The Cambridge Dictionary as, “Outside [of] society’s standard of acceptable, honest, and moral behavior.” Universal examples of immoral behavior include killing, stealing, lying, cheating, and many more. During the darkest, bloodiest war in the 20th century- World War ll, countless soldiers, prisoners, and common people; fathers, mothers, and children, violated many of these ethics of society. They abandoned and betrayed their family and they stole from stores in times of disaster. These people are not justified in their actions because immorality dehumanizes people and it contributes to the problem.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3) Is war ever justifiable? Take into account the wars fought all over the world in the past by international community. Is it political or personal reasons, or both? Evidence?…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wars have always brought an abundant amount of hate, sorrow, death; no matter how great is the reasoning and the obligation. Despite of all those horrible things, war have always exists like if it were part of human nature. However, when it come to comparing different wars on different time and locations, some at least seems to have more logical sense and significance when compare to others. Particularly the wars involved with United States, wars such as the fight for independence and from oppression from the British, world war one due to the German submarine attack on one of the American cargo ship, and the civil war due to separation of the north and southern states. All of these were a necessity and rational for the most part.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essay 1

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Some people think war is justified because; it is in order to counter terrorism. I think they're wrong because rather than war being the only solution my opinion is that war is the worse way to handle a conflict. I agree, that sometimes we are forced to do things we might not want to do, for example after the terrorist attack of September 11, it became inevitable for United States not to retaliate. It is logical and justifiable that the people, who are involved in those attacks directly or indirectly, must be captured and punished for killing more than 3000 people. However, I don't think that it makes war acceptable. In war, we intend to kill enemy troops, to get to dangerous leaders and avenge our own loss. Yet, we cannot have a violent, successful war without killing innocent people. If we are going to war to avenge the killing of our own citizens, think of what we are doing to them. We are going off and killing their innocent people, causing them the same pain we felt. Crito did not understand the madness of Socrates, Crito will do whatever it takes to help his friend to flee, instead of being exiled by the government. AI do not think that what you are doing is right, to give up your life when you can save it, and to hasten your fate as your enemies would hasten it, and indeed have hastened it in their wish to destroy you.@(Crito )…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Military Ethics

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages

    War has always been, and will always be, a necessary action perpetrated by the human race. There are many different reasons for war: rage, passion, greed, defense, and religion to name a few. When differences cannot be solved or compromised through mediation with an opposing party and anger burns with a fiery passion, war is the last remaining option. Obviously, the purpose of any war is to win. How are wars won? Perhaps if we were to ask a member of the Defense Department during the early stages of the war in Iraq, his answer might be, “To win this war we must force the enemy into submission by means of ethical warfare.” If we were to ask a marine in the Second World War what he was told by his commanding officer he would reply, “To close with the enemy and destroy him.” (Fussell, 763).…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Soldiers Thoughts

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    War, is it right or wrong? This question is defiantly up for discussion. If you are a civilian, war can be something you are for, against or maybe just don’t care about. Once you have joined the military, war is your life. In a way, war is your career. You are a hired assassin, hired to protect your family, friends and this county. All while putting your personal feelings aside.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    During World War II and the War on Terror, there are many moral issues. One of the questions that people ask regarding the wars is: is reasoning for going to war justified? On December…

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    War should never be used unless it is the last option available, and only if peace will really come as a result of the mass suffering and disaster. As General Dwight Eisenhower said in a message to his invasion troops, "You will bring about the destruction of the German war machine, the elimination of Nazi tyranny over the oppressed peoples of Europe, and security to yourselves in a free world" (39). The best way to solve a conflict is not to resort to violence, but rather to words. If war is inevitable, then those who had nothing to do with it should be left alone and not involved, such as innocent…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with there are numerous accounts where men led wars against other countries, destroyed property. In the name of conquering their land they have taken innocent lives all for their own interest. They try to justify the wars by saying it 's to solve a certain issue but there’s no way war is a solution to any problem.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The laws of war clearly state the action must be taken as a reaction and be able to be considered justified self-defense, or an act to neutralize the initial unethical act. The act must also coincide with an objective that as a whole is good, or in other words the end must be good to support the means. If these parameters are met then acts first considered unethical become ethical and justified in war. (Muhammad, 2010) This is supported by de Beauvoir in the passage, “Here we are faced with the difficult problem of means and ends in action. We know that “the supreme end at which man must aim is his freedom, but is there no limit to the means that can be chosen to achieve it? The means can be understood only in the light of the desired end but inversely, the end is inseparable from the mean by which it is carried out, and it is a fallacy to believe that the end can be achieved by just any means. It is not possible to act for man without treating certain men, at certain times, as means” (Melchert, 2002)…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “War never changes.” A memorable quote in the opening of the Fallout games describes exactly how war is. It will always be the same, death of people for others benefits. There will never be an era where peace triumphs war as long as humans live if we continue with how we interact with other countries. It's not all happiness and good times when war strikes, death of thousands, even entire nations are wiped off the planet. Should we continue with war or find some other way to reason with each other?…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Afghanistan War Ethics

    • 2052 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Are wars even supposed to have ethics? War ethics are important because a lot of people don 't even know they exist or if people even follow them. Civilized nations established the Humanitarian law; it is a law regarding how to confront enemies in a semi civilized way and mandates the treatment of prisoners of war (Masci 1013). This law is what raises a lot of hairs on religious leaders and causes anger since they feel that this law is not abided by. It seems that religion and war always tends to go along with war. Whether the wars are started by religions or its religious leaders having problems with how the wars are being fought. The law also states how prisoners are to be tried in the judicial system and if they are to have their trial in civilian or military courts. The main purpose of this law was an effort to control violence or even stop it. Another big factor of having this law the requirement it puts on governments to assess situations before they even start a war to make sure there is an imminent threat. On the down side, a lot of government officials feel that this law weakens the U. S. because of the peacekeeping could create backfires and end in war anyway. War ethics do exist and there will always be people who believe they are not followed. The people who follow or don 't follow these ethics will always stand out in one way or…

    • 2052 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    If the moral decision is whether killing in a war is right, you will have to go through these primary precepts to determine the answer. 1 'To preserve life', automatically you'd think that already killing in a war breaks this, but in the bigger picture you may be saving many more lives by killing in a just war. It could be the moral thing to do. 5, 'Live peacefully', this again goes against it, yet you may need to kill to then live peacefully after the war with no fear. So killing in a Just War, from a Natural Law perspective would be morally acceptable.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many people all over the world are involved in conflicts, whether they are small - like between sharing a toy, or big - like the war in Syria, is it ever right to fight?…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics