Preview

War Is Unacceptable Because Of Stupid Reasoning Of War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
342 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
War Is Unacceptable Because Of Stupid Reasoning Of War
RE
I think war is unacceptable for a number of different reasons. My first reason is the amount of civilians killed, such as when the two nuclear bombs were dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima in world war 2 and killed 350,000 innocent lives.
The Just War theory states that ‘civilians should not be targeted’ during a war. Most wars go against the just war theory statements and the two nuclear bombs in Nagasaki and Hiroshima is a prime example. This example also disobeys the just war theory rule of ‘proportionality’ where the war harm shouldn’t harm more people than its trying to prevent, using weapons of mass destruction.
Another reason why war is unacceptable is because of stupid reasoning behind the war. The just war theory presents that
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Similarities Between World War II And The War On Terror
    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Similarities Between World War II And The War On Terror

    During World War II and the War on Terror, there are many moral issues. One of the questions that people ask regarding the wars is: is reasoning for going to war justified? On December…

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Just War Theory In Vietnam
    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Just War Theory In Vietnam

    The part of the just war theory is called jus ad bellum. There must be a just cause, right authority, proportionality, the goal of peace, with war as a last resort. A country cannot attack another country for more wealth or for more respect. They must attack on behalf of an innocent third country or group. Right authority means that war must be declared by the proper authorities and not by private companies. Proportionality means that the potential war must be assessed regarding the cost of the war and the benefits from the war. The country must also decide whether or not the potential gains outweigh the loss of human lives and the cost of the war. Next, “will the destructiveness of the proposed conflict outweigh any enhancement of other human values?” That means will the war any enhance aspects of the human life more than the violence that will occur during the war. The purpose of the war must be for peace, not solely to win glory. Finally, the war must be a last resort, meaning that all other methods for peace must be attempted before resorting to…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Summary Of Conscription The Terrible Price Of War By Jonathan Granoff
    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Summary Of Conscription The Terrible Price Of War By Jonathan Granoff

    One frequently used example of just war is when U.S entering World War II. However, the nuclear bombs dropped on Japan definitely violated the principle of jus in bello that “noncombatants should not be intentionally targeted (Boss, 576).” Nuclear weapon is viewed as “the ultimate evil” because it could permanently destroy the ecosystem in a large area. “Not only are they destructive in magnitude but in horror as well (Granoff, 601).” Thus, many people are working at stop using any nuclear weapon. Those efforts currently met two problems. The first problem is the potential threat from the countries that already developed nuclear weapons. As long as a group of people have nuclear weapons, the attempt of some others to develop nuclear weapons will still go on. The second problem is what kind of weapon is considered “not a proportional response to the injury being redressed”? Should we allow the predator drone to vaporize people or the biological weapon that could spread diseases? Where is the limitation of the “humanity” for a war? Is killing one person to protect ten other persons a just behavior? What about killing one person to protect a thousand persons? Loss of lives in wars could hardly be just for any…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Outline the concepts of just war and pacifism
    • 1943 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Outline the concepts of just war and pacifism

    The Just war theory maintains that war may be justified if fought only in certain circumstances, and only if certain restrictions are applied to the way in which war is fought. The theory that was first propounded by St Augustine of Hippo and St Ambrose of Milan ( 4th and 5th centuries AD) attempts to clarify two fundamental questions: ‘when is it right to fight?’ and ‘How should war be fought?’. Whereas Pacifists are people mainly Christians who reject the use of violence and the deliberate killing of civilians but claims that peace is intrinsically good and ought to be upheld either as a duty and that war can never be justifiable. However, Realists agree that, due to the nature of humans, force is a necessary action to be used to maintain a just and ordered society. Therefore, since the Second World War, people have turned their attention to Just War again establishing rules that can serve as guidelines to a just war- the Hague and Geneva conventions.…

    • 1943 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    General Douglas Macarthur's Argumentative Analysis
    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages

    General Douglas Macarthur's Argumentative Analysis

    War should never be used unless it is the last option available, and only if peace will really come as a result of the mass suffering and disaster. As General Dwight Eisenhower said in a message to his invasion troops, "You will bring about the destruction of the German war machine, the elimination of Nazi tyranny over the oppressed peoples of Europe, and security to yourselves in a free world" (39). The best way to solve a conflict is not to resort to violence, but rather to words. If war is inevitable, then those who had nothing to do with it should be left alone and not involved, such as innocent…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Was Hiroshima Bombing Unjustified Justified
    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Was Hiroshima Bombing Unjustified Justified

    Many people say that the bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima was unjustified because the U.S. targeted…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics War
    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ethics War

    War seems to be the most inhumane act of violence, amongst people to fight against each other to defend their country or support a leader. The damage caused during war is the worst type of destruction humans can inflict upon each other.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What is the purpose of Just War
    • 582 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What is the purpose of Just War

    The purpose of Just War is to provide moral guidance throughout the stages of war to ensure that the reasons for going to war are morally justifiable, that war is conducted morally, and the transition back to peace is done in a moral manner. The purpose is to bring some semblance of rules, morality, and just fighting to the chaos, or as some believe, the immorality of war. There are times when although terrible, war is unavoidable and a better option than Pacifism. “There may be responsibilities so important, atrocities which can be prevented or outcomes so undesirable they justify war.”1…

    • 582 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay: The Just War Theory
    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: The Just War Theory

    This article “Just War Tradition” also refer to as Just War Theory is related to war because it explains the principles and morals behind on taking war as a last resort solution only if the options don't meet the requirements. Also, in the case of war was to happen they discussed on when and where warfare is appropriate to be taken place. Including that, the Just War Tradition was originally discovered by the Christians and their based it on their philosophy. Then theorist Saint Augustine made who made other factions to their philosophy for a better outcome. As years passed another theorist named Michael Walzer stepped in but this time around modernize the principles. The government must apply two principles the first principle is Jus ad Bellum…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    War, Just or Not?
    • 2986 Words
    • 12 Pages

    War, Just or Not?

    I believe that the progressive supporters of the war have confused a "just cause" with a "just war." There are unjust causes, such as the attempt of the United States to establish its power in Vietnam, or to dominate Panama or Grenada, or to subvert the government of Nicaragua. And a cause may be just--getting North Korea to withdraw from South Korea, getting Saddam Hussein to withdraw from Kuwait, or ending terrorism--but it does not follow that going to war on behalf of that cause, with the inevitable mayhem that follows, is just.…

    • 2986 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Just War Theory
    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Just War Theory

    What justifies war? Who justifies it? Why as human beings do we feel the need to fight, harm, and kill others to achieve certain goals? These questions have been pertinent to our society since the beginning of time and continue to challenge us to better understand the human psyche, and code of ethics that give Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Coast Guardsmen, and Marines credence to kill in the name of the United States of America. These ethics of war lay the foundation for that code of understanding and righteousness for when it is justifiable to pull the trigger and take the life of another, or commit an act of war.…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Things They Carried
    • 2057 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Things They Carried

    War presents a very complex moral dilemma. While it is necessary to fight for freedom, a better world, and what is right, war contradicts itself. The very same soldiers that fight in defense of these values have them taken away because of their experiences at war. The negative effects are just as big as the positive effects of war. A nation can never really win in war because of this. Instead war just stays a neutral thing.…

    • 2057 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Module 2 Essay
    • 278 Words
    • 1 Page

    Module 2 Essay

    It is reasonable to conclude that all wars are bad, but, in rare cases, war is forced upon the participants by the actions of one or all parties. It is also reasonable to believe that the negative effects of war, in all cases, far exceed the potential benefits. The fact is there are no good wars.…

    • 278 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Was Hiroshima Wrong
    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Was Hiroshima Wrong

    It consist of a body of ethical reflection on the justifiable use of force. This theory takes part in overcoming injustice, reducing acts of violence, clarifying when force may be used, restraining the resort to use force, and limiting damage done by war. The Just War Theory consists of seven sections: Just Cause, that force may only be used to correct a grave, public evil, Comparative Justice, where the rights on a side of a conflict must significantly outweigh the wrongs, Legitimate Authority, only duly constituted public authorities may use deadly force or wage war, Right Intention, force may only be used in a truly just cause, Probability of Success, arms may not be used in a cause where disproportionate measures are taken to achieve success, Proportionality, the good to be achieved must outweigh the overall destruction to be expected, and Last Resort, forced may not be used unless all other peaceful alternatives have been seriously tried and exhausted. Hiroshima was not a just case. Japan was already losing, they would have ended up surrendering before. The United States could have dropped it elsewhere, to try to scare them into surrendering when they saw the power of the bomb. The people of Hiroshima ended up with radiation sickness in the years following, they suffered in torture that the United States inflicted upon…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Warfare Is Wrong
    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Warfare Is Wrong

    Humanity always resolved their conflicts with one another with various weapons. The only difference is as over time, so do the methods of combat. Warfare is wrongfully defined as "the process of military struggle between two nations or groups of nations; war." (Warfare). This untrue definition induced many to wrongfully assume that only one type of warfare exists; Leading to believe it only happens on the battlefield during a war between countries. The actual definition of "warfare" doesn't imply military action or combat limited to only soldiers, yet it's defined as a direct act of aggression that ends with individuals emotionally or physically scarred.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics