Preview

Mills Utilitarianism Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
502 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mills Utilitarianism Analysis
The overall argument presented in Chapters 3 and 4 in Mills Utilitarianism was that one must adopt one single standard of ethics and that is what defines the morality of the individual. However, I believe that this is an unreasonable ideology as it is highly unlikely that anyone would simply chose one standard of ethics and follow this for the entirety of their life without changing their beliefs.

I respectfully disagree with Mills idea that somebody has to adopt one single standard of ethics or morality because I believe an intellectual individual would not simply chose one moral standard to follow for the rest of their life without ever questioning this belief. In reality, they should always question morality and their ideals should be constantly changing and adapting as time passes. If you would apply this same belief to the engineering field, I think the world would be in grave danger. A large part of an engineers’ success is to always be open to new ideas and continuously learn and grow in their field. So, for example, if you were to tell a manufacturing engineer that they had
…show more content…
Almost any individual will admit that they do not think the same way they did 10 or even 5 years ago. Mills also argues that “happiness is desirable” and I do not agree with this statement with my current definition of happiness. I believe happiness is a feeling you can achieve while taking part in an activity that makes you feel better than normal. So, if you desire to be happy all the time when will you know if you are experiencing happiness. If you spend all your time thinking about being happy you will not be able to tell you are happy until after it passes because so you were so focused on being happy you were not living in the moment. Thus, I think people should not spend their time trying to be happy simply knowing when they are experiencing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Pr in Selfish Pursuit

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I completely agree with Brandt on this issue. We have taken a very narrow and uncompromising stance on the issue of happiness. I argue that happiness is an extremely widespread concept. No two people can define happiness in the same way. Defining happiness through materialistic wealth and success may certainly be suitable for some people and reading “Herodotus” and “Plutarch” may be the definition of happiness for others. Still others may define happiness as spending…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To summarize this Mill’s chapter two about what utilitarianism is, basically meaning that individuals would find some kind of pleasure that are more desirable and more valuable to themselves are inherently good. Utilitarianism is pleasurable when the actions are good; when the actions are bad the pleasure decreases. To Mill he compares human pleasures are as equal as animalistic pleasures. It depends on what kind of pleasure people are seeking. For this purpose, Mill mentioned that people would have to look within quality of the pleasure people are seeking as well as quantity.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, Utility, or the Greatest Happiness Principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness” (11). That quote is from “Utilitarianism” written by John Stuart Mill. Mill is noted in history as a man who pushed for radical change of social and legal principles using Utilitarianism as his guide. That quote sums up his belief in that theory. In this essay I will be discussing Mill, the theory of Utilitarianism and how that theory relates to contemporary ethical issues.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history philosophers have introduced new ideas and belief systems into society in hopes to better the world they lived in. Many philosophers have introduced ideas that are still in practice in American government. While popular belief among those trying to pave a path forward was that government, as it stood, was tyrannical and overly restrictive, however John Stuart Mill believed that through government happiness and freedom can be achieved.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mill Utilitarianism

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Classical economists analyzed the nature of value primarily on the labor theory. Without a clear grasp of the concept of demand, Smith, Malthus and Ricardo often raise confusing and self-contradictory explanations of the definition of “value.” The utilitarianists, like Jeremy Bentham and J. S. Mill, offered a revolutionary approach to understand the demand-side of the economy. They consider the usefulness of the product as a whole rather than its process of production. In the development of the utilitarianism, reformists present a much more realistic, practical and comprehensive discussion of the nature of the economy: the necessity of comparative utilities, the concern about the distribution and quality of the utility, the key social influence…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In chapter number one titled “General Remarks” Mill starts off by talking about what is to be seen as morally right and morally wrong things, yet no one has a complete understanding for what is actually morally right and wrong. He then talks about “Moral Faculty” and two different views or opinions on the subject. Mill states in his text that “Our moral faculty, according to all those of its interpreters who are entitled to the name of thinkers, supplies us only with the general principles of moral judgments; it is a branch of our reason, not of our sensitive faculty; and must be looked to for the abstract doctrines of morality, not for perception of it in the concrete. The intuitive, no less than what may be termed the inductive, school of ethics, insists on the necessity of general laws.” The quote that Mill states is very outstanding for the reason of “applying the concept of law to ones certain case,” this is what Mill is trying to relate between the two different views. Mill also states that the differences between the two is where the “source from which they derive their authority” but yet they both agree on the concept of “moral law.” So as the chapter is coming to an end Mill comments on how “Utilitarianism has had a tremendous influence in shaping moral doctrines, even among the people who reject the principle.” Since our class had just been reading text from Kant his “idea of law” or “will” is still fresh in my mind and can easily be seen as a difference to what Mill is stating in the “Utilitarianism.” I can directly relate the two ideas because Kant’s “will” for a rational being may be thought of “the objective laws of reason and morality” or “subjective needs and interests,” which is what Mill is talking about in his two different views of “Moral Faculty.” Kant also states that “Act only on that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law” but Mill argues the point…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pleasures and pain contribute in determining the classification of one’s actions. In Mill’s Utilitarianism, he examines what determines an action to be considered right or wrong, his own version of the hedonistic utilitarianism argument. He claims that these qualities, including the quantity, are an important factor in determining, when included in the consequences, the criteria of an action. The consequences are significant in determining the results of one’s actions.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Darrin McMahon in his article “In Pursuit of Unhappiness” (2005) he states by searching for happiness you setting yourself up for disappointment. McMahon supports his claim by citing quotes from Thomas Carlyle and John Stuart Mill. McMahon purpose is to tell people not to look for happiness because in order to be happy you just got to live life and let happiness find you. McMahon explains his point of view in a serious tone and tells American and everyone else who may be looking for it. I disagree with McMahon because in order to be happy you have to find what makes you happy.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    John Stuart Mill was considered a Utilitarian. The philosophy of Utilitarianism is that an action should be decided by what is best for society. Mill’s philosophy was in part developed by his upbringing as a child. His childhood was restricted and he was raised in an enviroment where is emotionally needs were not met. Also his father was a friend of Jeremy Bentham. Bentham was a philosopher credited with starting the beginings of the Utiltarianism philosophy. He focused on the relationships between the social classes and working towards social reform. His philosophy focused more on social conditions and human behavior than previous philosophies had. He looked at practical solutions for societies problems and less on the metaphysical aspects…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill Utilitarianism Essay

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mill's Utilitarianism brings an extended concept of Bentham's philosophy and a response to Kant's deontological philosophy. The basic concept of utilitarianism is to act in such a way as to create the most pleasure or the least pain. This is the guideline because, as Mill states, we desire happiness; happiness is maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain. However, is utilitarianism viable? There are many arguments for it, but just as many against.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Stewart Mill described utilitarianism as a form of consequentialism. This theory describes human actions as being morally right or wrong solely on their effects. There are two types of utilitarianism: rule and act. Rule utilitarianism describes a person’s act is right as it conforms to a rule that leads to the greatest good and an act utilitarianism describes a person’s act as morally right if and only if it produces at least as much happiness as any other act. These two theories are on opposite spectrums, Kantian being a theory based on universal moral laws and utilitarianism being a theory based on the effects of human…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mill's use of the word happiness differs from the everyday usage, he includes the intellectual higher pleasures of thought and prioritises them over the lower pleasures of the senses.…

    • 2570 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the most common statements that are made in today’s society is to “Make yourself happy”. This leads to the controversy of how to create and achieve yearned for levels of happiness.John Stuart Mill is correct when he states that happiness cannot be reached when it is being searched for; it can only be achieved by focusing on things other than your own happiness.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    English philosopher, John Stuart Mill’s, introduced the ethical views of Utilitarianism, stating that whatever maximizes happiness for the greatest number of people is consider to be the greatest good. According to Utilitarianism, an action is morally right if it promotes happiness and morally wrong if it promotes pain. Utilitarianism is an attempt to answer the question “What should we do?” and its answer is that we ought to act in a way that the consequence produce happiness.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill's Utilitarianism

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Utilitarianism, is the argument that a man should judge everything based on his ability to promote the greatest individual happiness. In other words, even if your actions are wrong, they are morally justified if it is for the greater good or, the greatest individual happiness. There are many different standpoints on what happiness really is, in John Stuart Mill’s essay on utilitarianism he argues that as long as your behavior creates bliss it is accounted for as happiness. Stuart supports his claims by explaining his own research and knowledge on the subject, “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.”…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays