Preview

John Stuart Mill's Happiness Controversy

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1079 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
John Stuart Mill's Happiness Controversy
One of the most common statements that are made in today’s society is to “Make yourself happy”. This leads to the controversy of how to create and achieve yearned for levels of happiness.John Stuart Mill is correct when he states that happiness cannot be reached when it is being searched for; it can only be achieved by focusing on things other than your own happiness. First, what is happiness? Dictionary.com defines happiness as the quality or state of being delighted, pleased, or glad, as over a particular thing. To explain, this is an important thing to keep in mind when considering how happiness is achieved. Along with just being a feeling, happiness is the basis that this country was built on. For instance, as shown in Darrin M. McMahon’s …show more content…
To explain, the people feel that there is “too much concentration on gross national product and there should be more focus on gross national happiness”. One suggestion that was made by McMahon in regards to Mill was to put in time with a charity, spend time with family, or a walk in the park. McMahon followed that by saying that “If you’re lucky, you’ll find happiness; if not, your time won’t be wasted. You might even bring some joy to the world.” To clarify, McMahon is emphasizing the idea that happiness cannot be searched for as stated by Mill. Another issue that was brought into consideration is the issue of doing these activities and not achieving happiness. In response to this, when doing these activities one cannot be trying in any way to reach happiness. To explain, Mill stated, “Let your self-consciousness, exhaust itself on that; and if otherwise fortunately circumstanced you will inhale happiness with the air you breathe, without dwelling on it or thinking about it”. By trying even in the slightest to achieve happiness, you are destroying any chances you have at …show more content…
One of the easiest times of the year to see his idea in action is around the holidays. For instance, around Christmas time, there are Salvation Army buckets placed outside of stores. Meanwhile, somewhere in the parking lot, there is a young child and their mother walking toward the store. As soon as the child sees the bucket they start begging their mother for something to put in the bucket; the mother hands the child some money. As a result, both the child and the person who receives the money from the child inhale some essence of happiness. Along with this, another example of Mill’s ideas is in regards to family. To explain, when a child is young one of the many things that a parent teaches them is that they need to use the bathroom in a real toilet. In other words, a parent and child will face off with one another until the goal is achieved. Mill’s idea is shown when the child and their parent finally reach their goal. To clarify, a when the child finally reaches their goal, there is a sudden outburst of happiness by the parent and the child. In contrast, the parent and child did not begin this journey in order to achieve happiness; they were focused on something other than happiness which allowed them the chance to be happy. However, in both of these examples, an outsider could say that they do not have children; therefore, they are not able to reach their desired level of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mill separates pleasure into higher and lower as that he thinks some pleasure like higher is more for the soul and are long term and will benefit you as a person and the lower pleasures which are more material and offer short term pleasure but not the sort that lasts. He use the saying ‘Better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfies; Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied‘ to show the differences between the two pleasures as that you can be a human dissatisfied which is better than being a pig who is satisfied as that you are may not be happy or content but you are doing good which is better than someone who is happy and content but doing bad.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill separates pleasure into higher and lower as that he thinks some pleasure like higher is more for the soul and are long term and will benefit you as a person and the lower pleasures which are more material and offer short term pleasure but not the sort that lasts. He use the saying ‘Better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfies; Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied‘ to show the differences between the two pleasures as that you can be a human dissatisfied which is better than being a pig who is satisfied as that you are may not be happy or content but you are doing good which is better than someone who is happy and content but doing bad. Mill is considered a rule utilitarian.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Novelist Ayn Rand, in her book Anthem, wrote, “My happiness is not the means to any end. It is the end. It is its own goal. It is its own purpose”. Although happiness may seem like a simple concept to many, sometimes we don’t recognize it but we always take different paths, face many obstacles, and spend most of our lives trying to achieve happiness. Depending on the circumstances, every person has their own definition of what it means to attain happiness, whether through wealth, success, health, love etc. Happiness is a notion that be developed by focusing on the smaller things in life which are not given a great deal of thought to, but still can heavily impact us. One of these smaller yet significant ideas in life is individualism. Today…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill’s perspective on the human condition is one that I favor immensely opposed to Schopenhauer, because it displays an appreciation for what it means to be a human in its truest form. The fact that we are able to innately enjoy pleasures and reflect on the experience is unique and should be valued. Furthermore, we also are capable of enduring mental suffering and advancing through the struggle as a better being on the other side. Both of these situations effectively demonstrate the privilege we are granted by being human. In this paper I will present why Mill makes a strong argument for this case, and also contribute some of my own ideas to towards the concept.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    What is happiness? That is not a question that may be easily answered. Due to the fact that every human-being possesses their own views on life, it is possible that there are innumerable interpretations of what is ultimately this idea seen as happiness. For the purpose of interpreting the idea of happiness as opposed to “being happy” I believe that it is necessary that there be a more continual and perpetual meaning is attached to happiness. I do not believe that actual happiness is a fleeting experience, but instead, a lasting state in which someone finds themselves. When looking to a dictionary or other source of reference to determine an official and concrete meaning behind happiness, the Miriam-Webster…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Darrin McMahon in his article “In Pursuit of Unhappiness” (2005) he states by searching for happiness you setting yourself up for disappointment. McMahon supports his claim by citing quotes from Thomas Carlyle and John Stuart Mill. McMahon purpose is to tell people not to look for happiness because in order to be happy you just got to live life and let happiness find you. McMahon explains his point of view in a serious tone and tells American and everyone else who may be looking for it. I disagree with McMahon because in order to be happy you have to find what makes you happy.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Striving towards the achievement of happiness is what most people do, they make it their one most admired goal in life. John Stuart Mill, in Chapter V “A Crisis in My Mental Health. One Stage Onward.” of his autobiography, claims that if we yearn for happiness and make it our ultimate goal, it will automatically become unachievable. If we divert our attention toward something other than our own happiness, achieving it will become effortless. The journey through the enjoyments of life are what gives us happiness, but if we make it our goal we have failed.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. Happiness is intended pleasure and the absence of pain.” – John Stuart Mill…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Almost any individual will admit that they do not think the same way they did 10 or even 5 years ago. Mills also argues that “happiness is desirable” and I do not agree with this statement with my current definition of happiness. I believe happiness is a feeling you can achieve while taking part in an activity that makes you feel better than normal. So, if you desire to be happy all the time when will you know if you are experiencing happiness. If you spend all your time thinking about being happy you will not be able to tell you are happy until after it passes because so you were so focused on being happy you were not living in the moment. Thus, I think people should not spend their time trying to be happy simply knowing when they are experiencing…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He sets forth the idea that the only things that people want are happiness and absence of pain, and that all things people desire are for pleasure or prevention of pain. Mill’s then points out that humans pleasures are much more sophisticated than those of animals because humans are aware of higher faculties. This points out that there are some pleasures that are better or higher than others. Given that we are aware of those higher faculties, he states that when given the choice of different pleasures, men will get more satisfaction from those that allure to their higher faculties than those that don’t. Therefore Mill’s claims that “It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied,” or it is better to know about those higher pleasures than not to know (MacKinnon 1995).…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Brent Strawn, a religion professor, believes that many people in modern day see the pursuit of happiness as “‘[having] to do with ‘seeking it’ or ‘going after it’ somehow.’” However, in the 1700s, the pursuit of happiness was not seen as just practicing how to be happy, but actually obtaining it. Marcus Tullius Cicero once said, “‘What then is freedom? The power to live as one wishes.’” The Founding Fathers believed that everyone had the right to be truly happy not just attempting to be. Happiness was not about self-satisfaction or stupefied pleasure, but more of living life to its full potential; it was a choice. Sadly, in today’s society happiness is not a choice for all. Those in poverty, or facing discrimination in one form or another, do not always have the choice to be happy. Mankind has created such a culture that it is almost impossible to truly be one’s self without being persecuted for it. Moreover, the Founding Fathers viewed Great Britain as denying them the right to choose happiness, once again taking away their “unalienable…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    To verify this Mill stated the only way to prove something is desirable is by people desiring it, and that happiness, is the only desirable notion. In order to do this, it has to be shown that people will never desire anything other than happiness. Mill’s proof can be simplified into three premises: i. From ‘people desire x’ to ‘x is desirable’. ii. From ‘happiness is a good for each’ to ‘general happiness is good for the aggregate’.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Maslow Hierarchy Speech

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Attention Materials: Many times I have wondered what is true happiness. Is there such thing as true happiness? Can it even be attained if there is such a thing? Is it more of fulfilling desires, or satisfying psychological needs? Every person attempts to realize happiness in its fullest essence. It seems like today people are too busy trying to get rich. Nowadays it is believed that happiness lies in that new mansion, or a nice Ferrari. People are mistakingly assuming that wealth will bring to them a personal significance in which they will achieve happiness. Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs actually limits the relationship between happiness and material possessions. Abraham Harold Maslow is a humanist psychologist who taught at Brandeis University, Brooklyn College, New School for Social Research and Columbia University. He stressed the importance of focusing on the positive qualities in people, as opposed to treating them as a "bag of symptoms." It is believed that happiness, or self-actualization as Abraham Maslow calls it, is more of a mental and psychological thing. If you’re a psychology major you probably heard the term a couple of times, but I’d like to expand a little more about it.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criticism of John Mill

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In response to the second objection, Mill argues that society already knows, in general, which possible actions are right and which are wrong based on “…the whole past duration of the human species” (23). Therefore, it is already know how certain actions will affect the general happiness. He uses the notion of secondary morals to explain this argument. Secondary morals are in accordance with rules, such as do not murder or steal (class notes, 27 October 2011). In regards to the second criticism, Mill claims…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill is a utilitarian philosopher who lives by the Greatest Happiness Principle, in which there is a clear distinction between both lower and higher pleasures. Though thoroughly explained, one must also question the justification of these pleasures. Many of these beliefs leave the reader hanging on the edge, with further questions that need to be answered. What is the exact distinction between the lower and higher pleasures? And how are higher pleasures measured as most valuable? How clearly is Mill’s view of lower and higher pleasures justified?…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays