Preview

Mill's Utilitarianism Chapter Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
387 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mill's Utilitarianism Chapter Summary
To summarize this Mill’s chapter two about what utilitarianism is, basically meaning that individuals would find some kind of pleasure that are more desirable and more valuable to themselves are inherently good. Utilitarianism is pleasurable when the actions are good; when the actions are bad the pleasure decreases. To Mill he compares human pleasures are as equal as animalistic pleasures. It depends on what kind of pleasure people are seeking. For this purpose, Mill mentioned that people would have to look within quality of the pleasure people are seeking as well as quantity.
The most important part of the Mill’s utilitarianism chapter is the Greatest Happiness Principle. The Greatest Happiness Principle means the rule of human conduct. This
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Main Strengths of Mill's Utilitarianism
    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Main Strengths of Mill's Utilitarianism

    With rule utilitarianism you first have to agree to the general rule then after you apply it to specific cases.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain the Main Strengths of Mill's Utilitarianism
    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explain the Main Strengths of Mill's Utilitarianism

    Mill separates pleasure into higher and lower as that he thinks some pleasure like higher is more for the soul and are long term and will benefit you as a person and the lower pleasures which are more material and offer short term pleasure but not the sort that lasts. He use the saying ‘Better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfies; Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied‘ to show the differences between the two pleasures as that you can be a human dissatisfied which is better than being a pig who is satisfied as that you are may not be happy or content but you are doing good which is better than someone who is happy and content but doing bad. Mill is considered a rule utilitarian.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of The Theory Of Utilitarianism By John Stuart Mill
    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analysis Of The Theory Of Utilitarianism By John Stuart Mill

    “The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, Utility, or the Greatest Happiness Principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness” (11). That quote is from “Utilitarianism” written by John Stuart Mill. Mill is noted in history as a man who pushed for radical change of social and legal principles using Utilitarianism as his guide. That quote sums up his belief in that theory. In this essay I will be discussing Mill, the theory of Utilitarianism and how that theory relates to contemporary ethical issues.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    phil 111 exam
    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    phil 111 exam

    1. Utilitarianism is moral theory that tries to lay a set of rules that you should follow to achieve the most good or pleasure from any one act. Two popular proponents of this systems are philosophers by the name of Jeremy Bentham and James Mill. They both have different ideas for how one should go about the use of utilitarianism to achieve the greatest happiness. Bentham's approach is often called quantitative utilitarianism in which Bentham came up with an idea called the felicific calculus which is a way one can measure the level of happiness that can come out of one certain decision. For Bentham pleasure is countable and tangible, by this I mean that pleasure can be used as sort of a measuring system for what should be morally right or wrong. Now on the other hand James Mill takes a different view of utilitarianism in which he allows for so called greater pleasure. Meaning that even though the decision that the felicific calculus tells you to make may not be the most pleasurable because some decisions have the potential to grow overtime into a more rewarding pleasure. This is where Mills is commonly referred to as a qualitative utilitarianism because he differentiates between the qualities of the pleasures you can choose. This greater pleasure idea, though, also raises a few questions in such that is it really that the decision is a so called greater pleasure or is it that you choose such decision because of the opportunity to create more pleasure. It seems as though pleasure is still the end result when you make this decision it is just that you have the opportunity to fail or be successful in this decisions which is not really consistent with the idea of pleasure but more so of opportunity.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Mill Utilitarianism
    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mill Utilitarianism

    Classical economists analyzed the nature of value primarily on the labor theory. Without a clear grasp of the concept of demand, Smith, Malthus and Ricardo often raise confusing and self-contradictory explanations of the definition of “value.” The utilitarianists, like Jeremy Bentham and J. S. Mill, offered a revolutionary approach to understand the demand-side of the economy. They consider the usefulness of the product as a whole rather than its process of production. In the development of the utilitarianism, reformists present a much more realistic, practical and comprehensive discussion of the nature of the economy: the necessity of comparative utilities, the concern about the distribution and quality of the utility, the key social influence…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Mill: Utilitarianism, Chapters 1-3
    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mill: Utilitarianism, Chapters 1-3

    In chapter number one titled “General Remarks” Mill starts off by talking about what is to be seen as morally right and morally wrong things, yet no one has a complete understanding for what is actually morally right and wrong. He then talks about “Moral Faculty” and two different views or opinions on the subject. Mill states in his text that “Our moral faculty, according to all those of its interpreters who are entitled to the name of thinkers, supplies us only with the general principles of moral judgments; it is a branch of our reason, not of our sensitive faculty; and must be looked to for the abstract doctrines of morality, not for perception of it in the concrete. The intuitive, no less than what may be termed the inductive, school of ethics, insists on the necessity of general laws.” The quote that Mill states is very outstanding for the reason of “applying the concept of law to ones certain case,” this is what Mill is trying to relate between the two different views. Mill also states that the differences between the two is where the “source from which they derive their authority” but yet they both agree on the concept of “moral law.” So as the chapter is coming to an end Mill comments on how “Utilitarianism has had a tremendous influence in shaping moral doctrines, even among the people who reject the principle.” Since our class had just been reading text from Kant his “idea of law” or “will” is still fresh in my mind and can easily be seen as a difference to what Mill is stating in the “Utilitarianism.” I can directly relate the two ideas because Kant’s “will” for a rational being may be thought of “the objective laws of reason and morality” or “subjective needs and interests,” which is what Mill is talking about in his two different views of “Moral Faculty.” Kant also states that “Act only on that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law” but Mill argues the point…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism
    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism

    Pleasures and pain contribute in determining the classification of one’s actions. In Mill’s Utilitarianism, he examines what determines an action to be considered right or wrong, his own version of the hedonistic utilitarianism argument. He claims that these qualities, including the quantity, are an important factor in determining, when included in the consequences, the criteria of an action. The consequences are significant in determining the results of one’s actions.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    John Stuart Mill Utilitarianism
    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages

    John Stuart Mill Utilitarianism

    John Stuart Mill was considered a Utilitarian. The philosophy of Utilitarianism is that an action should be decided by what is best for society. Mill’s philosophy was in part developed by his upbringing as a child. His childhood was restricted and he was raised in an enviroment where is emotionally needs were not met. Also his father was a friend of Jeremy Bentham. Bentham was a philosopher credited with starting the beginings of the Utiltarianism philosophy. He focused on the relationships between the social classes and working towards social reform. His philosophy focused more on social conditions and human behavior than previous philosophies had. He looked at practical solutions for societies problems and less on the metaphysical aspects…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill
    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages

    John Stuart Mill

    Mill’s Utilitarianism states that in order to be moral, one must make decisions based upon the greatest happiness. In…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mill Utilitarianism Essay
    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mill Utilitarianism Essay

    Mill's Utilitarianism brings an extended concept of Bentham's philosophy and a response to Kant's deontological philosophy. The basic concept of utilitarianism is to act in such a way as to create the most pleasure or the least pain. This is the guideline because, as Mill states, we desire happiness; happiness is maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain. However, is utilitarianism viable? There are many arguments for it, but just as many against.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mills Utilitarianism Analysis
    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mills Utilitarianism Analysis

    The overall argument presented in Chapters 3 and 4 in Mills Utilitarianism was that one must adopt one single standard of ethics and that is what defines the morality of the individual. However, I believe that this is an unreasonable ideology as it is highly unlikely that anyone would simply chose one standard of ethics and follow this for the entirety of their life without changing their beliefs.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Good and Evil in High Noon
    • 1373 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Good and Evil in High Noon

    Utilitarianism is an ethical theory most often ascribed to the philosopher John Stuart Mill. The utilitarian theory suggests actions and/or intentions are not right or wrong; rather the morality of a choice or act is determined by the outcome or result. Utilitarian’s believe outcomes can be determined in advance of an action and the ethical choice is one which provides the best result or most happiness for the greatest number of individuals (e.g., pleasure, happiness, health, knowledge, satisfaction). The utility theory asserts morality is a means to some other end, it does not stand on its own as being intrinsically moral.…

    • 1373 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kant Vs Mill
    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kant Vs Mill

    This view forms the basis of the contrasting argument between him and Kant .Mill principle of `utility also known as the greatest happiness is that, when people act out of duty it justifies the utilitarian principle as a foundation of morals.It explains that actions are right in proportions and promote overall human happiness of everything or anything that can ;possibly tolerate pain.it focus on the consequence of actions.Not on rights or ethical sentiments.it is best to be cultivated and noble…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mill's View of Lower/Higher Pleasures
    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mill's View of Lower/Higher Pleasures

    Mill is a utilitarian philosopher who lives by the Greatest Happiness Principle, in which there is a clear distinction between both lower and higher pleasures. Though thoroughly explained, one must also question the justification of these pleasures. Many of these beliefs leave the reader hanging on the edge, with further questions that need to be answered. What is the exact distinction between the lower and higher pleasures? And how are higher pleasures measured as most valuable? How clearly is Mill’s view of lower and higher pleasures justified?…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mill On Liberty
    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mill On Liberty

    His main principle states that “the sole end for which mankind are warranted, individually or collectively, in interfering with the liberty of action or any of their number is self-protection…the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others” (752). Mill’s harm principle allows individuals to do whatever they please so long as it does not harm others. However, utilitarianism is by definition concerned for the collective well-being and prescribes limiting individual liberty in order to add to the happiness of the collective. The harm principle implies that the utility principle has no power within the domain of the individual so long as their actions are “self-regarding” (753). For utilitarians, there is only one principle: that of utility. Mill is introducing a second, the principle of liberty, and seems to privilege it the same by protecting it, regardless of its contribution to overall happiness. Mill cannot label his argument “utilitarian” because favouring a principle that does not necessarily maximize happiness is not conducive to…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics