Preview

Milgram Experiments

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
261 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Milgram Experiments
I don’t think this experiment should be replicated today. The reason being is that the Generation we have today has a different mindset and that the experiment is unethical in my view. In 1961, Milgram was able to make the participants agree with the experiment. These results led to people trying out these trails because the participants knew the shock would be painful but not dangerous. With that being said, it shows you the mindset of the people during that time. People were laid back and were willing to try anything. Usually, when people are told something from a person who is an expert in his or her field, they tend to believe and trust the individual.
In today’s society, I think that most individual’s would try an experiment based on

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Milgram's Experiment brings up the point that people under the pressure of other, will more likely obey orders even if it goes against their moral beliefs. In "To Obey of Not to Obey", most of the soldiers obeyed their superiors because they were taught to do so. Similarly in Migram's Experient, the "teachers" obeyed when the experimenter pressured the subject to continue with the shocks. This can be related to Slaughterhouse Five because the German soldiers are under the command of their superiors who are requiring them to take American prisoners. This pressure was passed down from the German soldiers who demanded the American soldiers to clean up the charred remains of dead civilians after the bombing of Dresden.…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Luke might have acted this way due to the way he grew up. Luke might have acted this way because his family might have not enacted strict rules on his life. This is evident because of how he spoke with his mom. In the movie, the conversation he has with his mom seemed very casual. Almost seemed like he did not have respect for his mom nor did it seem like he treasured his mom, after she visited him in jail. She was very sick as well. This shows how much Luke has a problem with authority because of the way he talks to his mom. And his learning of authority starts with where he learned authority.This is relevant to the participants in the Milgram experiment. Because there was the few people that refused to continue with the experiment despite…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Daniel Parks Freshman Studies Term II Critical Analysis and Milgram’s Response Obedience to Authority and the obedience experiments that produced Stanley Milgram’s famous book have produced almost equal amounts of surprise, curiosity and criticism. The criticism of social psychologist John Darley and playwright Dannie Abse are each representative of the general criticism Milgram has received; Darley focuses on whether the study has any relevance to real world events (such as the Holocaust), and Abse focuses on justification of the experiment, i.e. was the study worth doing in spite of the deception employed and its potential harm to the subjects. To Milgram, this criticism demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of the goals and implications of the obedience study, to which he has responded by restating the goal of the experiment and explaining its beneficial effects upon the subjects.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Replicating Milgram (The Open University, 2014), Milgram explains how he set up his obedience experiment. His aim was to get a volunteer, a ‘teacher’ to inflict increasing amounts of pain, through electric shocks, to another volunteer a ‘learner’ and to see when the ‘teacher’ would turn to the researcher, the ‘authority figure’ and ask to stop. Unknown to ‘the teacher’, the ‘learner’ and the ‘authority figure’ were aware of the real purpose of the experiment; the ‘teacher’ was told it was to study the effect of punishment on learning, and genuinely thought that they were inflicting pain on the ‘learner’ sat in another room. It was this deception and the emotional stress it generated to the ‘teacher’ that prompted the ethical issues debate…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I am personally disgusted by this study. It makes me sick to see that people were getting shocked for the wrong answer. It is inhumane and horrifying. In the video, you heard a man stating that his heart was bothering him, and the respondent looked at the administrator and said “I will not be responsible for this” and continued on.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nearly half a century after they were conducted, Milgram’s (1963, 1965, 1974) obedience studies remain among psychology’s most widely known and most often discussed experiments. Briefly, under the guise of a learning study, an experimenter instructed participants to administer increasingly powerful electric shocks to a ‘‘learner’’ when the learner made mistakes on a memory task. Although in reality no shocks were delivered, participants were instructed to start with a 15-volt shock for the learner’s first mistake and to increase the voltage in 15-volt increments for each successive mistake. In the basic procedure (Experiment 5), participants could hear the learner’s vocal protests and demands to be set free through the wall that separated…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    draft5 1

    • 1345 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The subjects in this experiment were not aware of what Milgram is testing them for. Each participants had different reaction to leaners’ pled. Fred Prozi began the experiment calmly but becomes increasingly tense as the experiment proceeds. He was shaking his head saying “who is going to take the responsibility if anything happens to that gentleman?”(Milgram 4). Prozi was fearing the responsibility of something happening to the learner. Inside him, he did not wanted to hurt the learner. He was afraid of declining to keep the experiment going on because he was expected to continuo by the experimenter. A medical technician named Gretchen Brandt, refused to go any further after 210 volts. She said that she was there on her own free will also didn't want to take the responsibility. She was being who she was in reality and was brave enough to decline the process no…

    • 1345 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Stanley Milgram experiment takes normal everyday people and gives them orders to do horrible…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram's experiment in 1960 by social psychologist Dr. Stanely Milgram's (1963, 1965) was a controversial experiment. He researched the effect of authority on obedience. I don't think the scientific community overreacted to this experiment because it is unethical to reduce subjects to "twitching shuttering wrecks". Though the human mind is amazing strong we still do not know its breaking point. For interviewers to carry out the kind of experiment they did, they have to be willing to face the consequences of the experiment which could be a permanent damaged mental state. I do believe we need to do experiments like this as the outcome was very eye opening but it has to be better regulated and the background and methods of experimentation clearly…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Zimbardo Experiment Ethics

    • 1804 Words
    • 8 Pages

    By doing this it would allow the person, whether it had been Zimbardo himself or someone else to remain more objective by not being so emotionally and physically involved. Secondly he denied Richard Yacco the ability to leave. Whenever one conducts an experiment, all who are involved should have the right to end their involvement at anytime. Finally there was no proper debriefing, as well as it was argued that many left in a worse mental state then prior to the experiment. Now some may not be bothered by such an experiment in fact, we have seen other controversial studies such as Mailgrams’ study, where he was studying the conflict between personal conscious, and obedience to authority. Milgram had his subjects administer shocks at what they thought to be at a lethal level. In Milgram’s study, they found individuals who were instructed to give shocks based on how some one answered a question, if they got the question wrong, they were to shock the individual, raising the intensity of the shock, though it was actually a hoax. The person who they believed to be receiving the shocks, were actually acting. When one of the subjects would hesitate in fear of hurting or killing the other person , they would be encouraged to continue. What might be considered more alarming then his actual study, was that at least 65 percent actually administered what they thought to be at a lethal level. (…

    • 1804 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stanley Milgram was an extremely famous psychologist who was best known for his groundbreaking experiment on the subject of obedience during the 1960s. Milgram began his career as a psychologist just around the time that the horrifying truth of the concentration camps came out. The fact that almost an entire nation obeyed one man, who commanded them to do inhumane and grotesque acts to other human beings intrigued Stanley Milgram. He became even more interested when he began watching the trial of Adolf Eichmann, who simply did not seem to be the appalling monster that many people expected and portrayed him to be. In fact, Milgram described Eichmann as being less of a “sadistic monster…[and] that he came closer to being an uninspired bureaucrat…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yale University psychologist, Stanley Milgram, conducted an experiment in 1961 focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. He examined justifications for acts of genocide offered by those accused at the World War II Nuremberg War Criminal trials. Their defense often was based on "obedience" - that they were just following orders from their superiors. Milgram's experiment, which he told his participants was about learning, was to have participants (teacher) question another participant (learner), and when the learner got a question wrong the teacher would shock the learner. For every question wrong, the teacher would increase the amount of volts used in the shock. Of course the experiment was actually about obedience, the learner was an experimenter, and the shock was faked (McLeod). Milgram's was one of the first psychology experiments to use…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Known as the Stanford Prison Experiment, the study went on to become one of the best-known in psychology's history. Zimbardo, a former classmate of Stanley Milgram (who is best-known for his famous obedience experiment), was interested in expanding on Milgram's research. "Suppose you had only kids who were normally healthy, psychologically and physically, and they knew they would be going into a prison-like environment and that some of their civil rights would be sacrificed. Would those good people, put in that bad, evil place—would their goodness triumph?" said Zimbardo in one interview. The researchers set up a mock prison in the basement of Stanford University's psychology building. The participants were chosen from a group of 70 volunteers because they had no criminal background, lacked psychological issues, and had no significant medical conditions. The volunteers agreed to participate during a one to two-week period in exchange for $15 a day.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The participants were not too quick to jump into the research though, until of course, they were given incentives, their cooperation was built on the promise of help and generosity of mankind. As time moved forward, I believe they were still hopeful due in part to the fabrication of treatment, but maybe a bit suspicious, hence the start of the covers for burial preparations if death, in fact, struck them. As the years progressed, many participants died, from the severity of their illness, so therefore much of the primary evidence of feelings and emotions is not known. Over time, I expect that the attitudes toward the experiment, from the perspective of the participants and outsiders, did indeed change, and not positively. In decades following, the attention became negative, angry, and impatient. As of now, I believe people, of all races, are utterly disgusted and outraged. The fact that this continued for nearly forty years is incredible and…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram’s experiment that I would obey until the learner couldn’t take the pain anymore. Even though I agreed to follow through with the experiment my sympathy for the learner would take over. I think for most people it is hard to see another person in so much pain and it would make it all that worse if they were the ones inflicting the pain. If we were to do the experiment today I do think the results would be different. I feel that way because people are now more likely to think for themselves regardless of the circumstances. I think people now would question the reason behind the experiment and wonder why the experiment was being done in the first place. I think people tend to not be so afraid to ask questions or disobey authority than back when the experiment first took place.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays