Meat Tenderizer Research Paper
If the type of meat is pork chop, then the mass will increase. This project is about how carbonated drinks can be meat tenderizers. Raw meat is being used because if the mass of raw meat is decreased by carbonated drinks then the carbonated drink has a chance of decreasing the mass of foods ingested by humans. This project is interesting because if the mass of meat changes with carbonated drinks then that proves that carbonated drinks can act like meat tenderizers. The achievement of this project is to prove if humans really have to spend more money for a meat tenderizer or can humans use the carbonated drinks from the home.
There is history of similar projects and the carbonated drink was Coke. The meats used were steak, chicken breast, …show more content…
The purpose of the project was to see if Dr. Pepper is a meat tenderizer like Coke. The type of meat used which were pork chop, beef roast, and chicken breast is the independent variable. The mass of meat in grams is the dependent variable. The constants are the size of the beaker, temperature of the air surrounding, the amount of Dr. Pepper, the time the meat spent in the Dr. Pepper, and the original mass of meat. The results after being in the Dr. Pepper is the pork chop 16.1 grams, chicken breast 13.5 grams, beef roast 13.1 grams. The results of the distilled water were and vinegar were.The hypothesis which stated that the mass of the pork chop will increase was supported because the results was 16.1 grams and the chicken breast and beef roast results came out to the thirteens. If the experiment was repeated the type of meat would be changed and the type carbonated drink would change just to see if more than just Coke and Dr. Pepper are meat tenderizers. The possible experimental errors are the way the meat is weighed either with the Dr. Pepper all drained off or some of the Dr. Pepper still dripping off of the meat can change the mass of the meat if the other meats were weighed the other way. The beaker used could have been contaminating the meat inside of the beaker causing the meat to react in any different
There is history of similar projects and the carbonated drink was Coke. The meats used were steak, chicken breast, …show more content…
The purpose of the project was to see if Dr. Pepper is a meat tenderizer like Coke. The type of meat used which were pork chop, beef roast, and chicken breast is the independent variable. The mass of meat in grams is the dependent variable. The constants are the size of the beaker, temperature of the air surrounding, the amount of Dr. Pepper, the time the meat spent in the Dr. Pepper, and the original mass of meat. The results after being in the Dr. Pepper is the pork chop 16.1 grams, chicken breast 13.5 grams, beef roast 13.1 grams. The results of the distilled water were and vinegar were.The hypothesis which stated that the mass of the pork chop will increase was supported because the results was 16.1 grams and the chicken breast and beef roast results came out to the thirteens. If the experiment was repeated the type of meat would be changed and the type carbonated drink would change just to see if more than just Coke and Dr. Pepper are meat tenderizers. The possible experimental errors are the way the meat is weighed either with the Dr. Pepper all drained off or some of the Dr. Pepper still dripping off of the meat can change the mass of the meat if the other meats were weighed the other way. The beaker used could have been contaminating the meat inside of the beaker causing the meat to react in any different