Preview

McIntyre vs. Balentine: Lawsuit Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1176 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
McIntyre vs. Balentine: Lawsuit Analysis
Assignment V- McIntyre vs. Balentine, 833 S.W.2d 52 (Tenn. 1992)

Prof Lindsey Appiah
Tort Law
December 16, 2012
Actions that gave rise to suit
The McIntyre v Balentine law suit was the result of a vehicular accident that occurred on November 2, 1986. The plaintiff, Harry McIntyre, was exiting Smith’s Truck Stop in Savannah Tennessee onto Southbound Highway 69. The defendant, Clifford Balentine was already traveling Southbound on Highway 69. Moments after Mr. McIntyre entered Highway 69, his truck was struck by Mr. Balentine’s tractor. Mr. McIntyre sustained severe injuries as a result of the accident.
There were several factors which contributed to the fog of fault for both the plaintiff and the defendant. These factors included speed and alcohol. Both the plaintiff and the defendant had admitted to consuming alcohol prior to the accident. Mr. McIntyre admitted to the consumption of at least (7) 16 ounce beers while Mr. Balentine had consumed at least (4) Whiskey drinks. It was approximately 3 hours after both men had finished drinking that the accident occurred, which was approximately 2:30 am.
Prior to Mr. McIntyre exiting Smith’s Truck Stop onto Highway 69S, he observed 2 eight-teen wheelers parked close to the highway. These parked vehicles were obstructing Mr. McIntyre’s view of oncoming traffic. Mr. McIntyre never saw Mr. Balentine’s tractor approaching. Moments after entering Highway 69, Mr. McIntyre’s truck was struck in the right rear corner by Mr. Balentine’s tractor.
After the accident, Mr. McIntyre’s blood alcohol content was measured at .17. In most states, a blood alcohol content of .08 or higher could result in the more serious offense of DWI (driving while intoxicated) versus the less serious DUI (driving under the influence, usually .07 and below). (Diagram completed by author of paper/visual aid only)

As a result of the accident, Mr. McIntyre brought civil suit against Mr. Balentine and East-West Motor

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In the case of White v. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern, Mrs. White is suing Mr. Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern in the death of her husband, Mr. White. Mr. Edward Hard was a patron of the tavern the night of the accident with Mr. and Mrs. White. Mr. Hard was in a relationship with Mrs. White before she married Mr. White. Mr. Hard saw Mr. and Mrs. White leave the tavern on this night and followed them out the door. Mrs. White observed Mr. Hard drinking several alcoholic beverages while they were there. When Mr. and Mrs. White where leaving Mr. Hard confronted Mr. White telling him that “she should be my wife” and “this is not over.” After Mr. and Mrs. White got in their car and were leaving the establishment, Mr. Hard followed them driving recklessly. He was swerving across the road, driving in the opposite lane, and hitting mailboxes. His recklessness and inability to drive due to being intoxicated resulted in him crashing into Mr. and Mrs. White’s vehicle ultimately killing Mr. White and severely injuring Mrs. White. This court case took place in United States District Court in the Northern District of Indiana. This is court case number 82A04-8876-CB285, White vs. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. The lawyers in this case are Benjamin Walton, Jordan Van Meter who represent the defendants Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern and Jackson Welch, Amanda Babot who represent the plaintiff Debbie White.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    FACTS: Defendant, AAA North Jersey, Inc. (“AAA”), contracted with Five Star Auto Service (“Five Star”) to perform towing and auto repair services for AAA. Defendant Terence Pershad, a tow-truck driver employed by Five Star, received a call through AAA to assist a crashed car. Upon Pershad’s arrival at the crash site, Pershad and Plaintiff Nicholas Coker (a passenger of the crashed car) began fighting, which ended soon after Pershad assaulted Plaintiff with a knife. Plaintiff filed suit in a New Jersey state court against Pershad, Five Star, and AAA. The trial court determined that AAA held no responsibility for the alleged negligence of Five Star in hiring Pershad, and granted AAA summary judgement. Coker appealed the trial court’s ruling to the New Jersey Appellate Court.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    9. On the occasion in question, Defendant was traveling behind Plaintiff in the left hand lane of Interstate 57 when Plaintiff noticed Defendant’s lights flashing. Plaintiff moved over to the right hand lane to allow Defendant to pass, at which time he saw beer cases falling from Defendant’s truck towards him. Plaintiff swerved left in an attempt to avoid the beer cases when the accident occurred.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    S/S Cabrera Case Study

    • 217 Words
    • 1 Page

    On 2/16/16 at 9:08 P.M, Shift Supervisor Enmanuel Cabrera was notified by Transship Desk clerk Thomas Nick that an accident occurred in the Truck Yard. At 9:12 P.M, S/S Cabrera went out of the Transship cage with Desk clerk Thomas Nick as a spotter for safety purposes. Upon arrival at the scene of the accident, S/S Cabrera was met by the victim JB Hunt driver Donald Perkins. Mr. Perkins was driving JB Hunt tractor 352470 pulling trailer JBHU 264923. Mr. Perkins stated that while closing his trailer doors, he felt the tractor move like so back into him. Mr. Perkins saw that there was a covenant trailer in front of his tractor. Mr. Perkins immediately notified the Amazon TDR associate that where an incident in the Truck Yard.…

    • 217 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On 8/6/15 Mr. and Mrs. Lecaine were restraint driver and passenger in their vehicle. They were at a complete stop when they were rear ended and pushed into the vehicle stopped in front o them. The car that hit them was going approximately…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While on duty, I observed a dark colored passenger car sitting at the back parking lot at Franklin Ball Park. Anyone at Franklin Ball Park is also trespassing after dark. I approached the vehilce and upon my approach, the driver, Wesley Herrington was throwing up on the ground. I also smelled a strong odor of an alcoholic beverage coming fro his expelled breath. The keys to the car were also in the ignition upon my approach. Herrington also admited that he was drinking alcohol. I aslo abserved a bottle of liquor sitting in the passenger seat, in Herrington reach.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    PA205

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On or about April 8, 2013, the plaintiff was en route back to his home after signing a three-year contract with MCI records after winning National Idol. The plaintiff was riding his motorcycle southbound on Highway 57 going a speed of 60-65 miles per hour. The defendant’s driver flashed his lights signaling the need to pass which the plaintiff obliged to. The plaintiff swerved to avoid falling cases of beer but was struck.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    dynamic business law

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Javier Galindo, the husband of the plaintiff, was sitting in his car in the driveway of Mr. Clark's property waiting to pick up his wife, who worked as a housekeeper for Mr. Clark, when a leaning 80 ft tree on an adjacent property fell on the plaintiff's husband's car and killed him. Ms. Galindo sued Mr. Clark for failing to notify her husband of the danger posed by the leaning tree.…

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Litigation Unit 3

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JUSTIN WILLIAM KING, ) ) Plaintiff. ) ) ) v. ) ) ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES, INC. ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) COMPLAINT Comes Now the plaintiff, Justin King, by and through his attorney, states as follows: PARTIES AND JURISDICTION 1. Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of Cook County, State of Illinois. 2. Defendant is a corporation with its principal place of business in Missouri and carries on business in Illinois. 3. This court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims presented in this complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because plaintiff is a resident of Illinois and the defendant is a citizen of Missouri and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of fees and costs. 4. Personal jurisdiction and venue are proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because the acts of defendant caused harm to plaintiff in Cook County, in United States Court for the Northern District of Illinois. COUNT I: ________ 5. On or about April 8, 2011, plaintiff Justin King, while in the exercise of due care, was operating his motorcycle on Interstate 57, heading in a south direction, in the City of Paxton, Illinois. 6. On the occasion in question, defendant, Frank Cuellar, a resident of Illinois, was operating a truck owned by Anheuser-Busch as its agent, and was traveling in a south direction on Interstate 57, so called, a public highway in the City of Paxton, Illinois. 7. On the occasion in question, plaintiff Justin King was traveling south on Interstate 57 in Paxton, IL on his motorcycle when he noticed a truck with Anheuser-Busch logo traveling behind him headed in the same direction. The plaintiff noticed Mr. Cuellar flashing his headlights requesting to pass the plaintiff and proceeded to switch lanes. Justin King then changed lanes to the right hand lane…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of the fifteen-year-old Rob Jr., the Church of Devine Light was at fault will be held responsible for the actions of Tom Marsden, an employee of the church, under strict liability. Rob’s parents, Rob Sr. and Bunny, could file charges against Tom Marsden and the Church of Devine Light for negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and false imprisonment.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Goods or Services

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gulash v. Stylarama, 33 Conn. Supp. 108, 364 A. 2d 1221, Web 1975 Conn. Super. Lexis 209 ( Superior Court of Connecticut).…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zoom Car Company

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The main legal issues that have come about from this case are very important for many reasons. Zoom Car Company is being sued on part of Daniel Boone for them to pay for his medical expenses resulting from being dragged from his car and being beaten. The reason behind this is his compass that was installed in his car by Zoom Car Company was faulty which lead him in the wrong direction where he got lost and ended up in a horrible situation. Daniel Boone is suing for his medical bills to be paid by the company of the faulty feature the car offered when it was bought. Who should be responsible for Daniel Boone’s medical bills?…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Public Speaking Outline

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    D. Thesis: To some people drunk driving can seem as of no big deal, but to others drunk driving is serious. Drinking and driving send a person through legal ramifications, emotional consequences, and financial turmoil.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bruce & Dyer

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The defendant attempted to pass the plaintiffs car on the highway several times, during which, the plaintiff prevented the defendant from re-entering the traffic lane by increasing his speed. After being followed for 16 km, the plaintiff stopped his car on the paved portion of the highway to block the defendants’ passage. The plaintiff then emerged from his car shaking his fist and walked towards to the defendants’ vehicle. The defendant got out of his car and when the parties met, the defendant struck the plaintiff on his chin. The plaintiff had a diseased jaw and thus the strike resulted in a serious fracture to his jaw. The plaintiff brought action against the defendant for damages of assault.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Whether the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence and assume the risk of particular accident?…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays