Preview

Martha Stewart

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
671 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Martha Stewart
Case 5-Martha Stewart: A Brand in Crisis

1. Stewart repeatedly denied any wrongdoing, despite the conviction and failed appeal, yet she still says she did nothing wrong. Is this the right strategy?

Yes, admit your mistakes, learn from them and move on but don’t continue to make them over and over again. Stewart demoed that she engaged in any improper trading when she sold her shares of ImClone stock (Ferrell, Fraedrich, & Ferrell, 2007, page 345).Stewart claimed she had previously issued a “stop-loss” order to sell her 3928 shares; she also called her friend Sam Waksal, but could not reach him. However, Stewart’s explanation that she unloaded her stock because of a pre-arranged sell order collapsed when Douglas Faneuil, the broker’s assistant who handled the sale of the ImClone stock for Stewart, told Merrill Lynch lawyers that his boss, Peter Bacanovic, had pressured him to lie about a stop-loss order.

2. Did Stewart’s actions justify the subsequent sentence to her and those around her?

Despite her reputation and business successes, Stewart was indicted in 2003 on criminal charges and faced several civil lawsuits to her sale of the ImClone stock (Ferrell, Fraedrich, & Ferrell, 2007, page 344). Stewart sold the stock on December 27, 2001, one day before the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) refused to review ImClone System’s cancer drug Erbitux; the company’s stock tumbled following the FDA’s announcement. On June 4, 2003, a federal grand jury indicted Stewart on charges of securities fraud, conspiracy (together with Bacanovic), making false statements, and obstruction of justice (Ferrell, Fraedrich, & Ferrell, 2007, page 346). At her trial, the indictments for securities fraud were dropped, but the other indictments were prosecuted (Ferrell, Fraedrich, & Ferrell, 2007, page 347). Stewart faced humiliation and some prison time but examples have to be set when running a company. You just can’t do what you please because you



References: Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2007). Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making and Cases (7th ed). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin. Hein, K., & Cassidy, H. (2002). As Big Scandals Mount, Experts Say Be Truthful--and Careful--in Ads. Brandweek. Article. Retrieved from EBSCO HOST: Business Source Complete.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    References: C., O., John Fraedrich, and Linda Ferrell. Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making and Cases. South-Western Pub, 2010. Print…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2005). Business Ethics Ethical Decision Making and Cases. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2008). business ethics ethical decision making and cases. (7 ed.). boston: houghton mifflin.…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martha Stewart Fraud Case

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 2003, Martha Stewart was facing prison time and her empire in domestic art was at risk because of “nine-count federal indictment” which she was charge will “perjury and conspiracy” because of a “high profile stock trading scandal” (Hurtado, N. P. (n.d.). James Comey, a U.S. Attorney, said that “she brought trouble on herself and her company by lying to her shareholders and investors in an attempt to cover her tracks and keep her stock from plummeting” (Hurtado, N. P. (n.d.). Comey believe that the criminal case was all about lying and he said that Martha is being prosecuted for what she did and not who she is. When she went to court she plead not guilty. Stewart was also charge with “securities fraud stemming” (Hurtado, N. P. (n.d.).,…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Martha Stewart lost the support and trust of her stakeholders; it was obvious that she was not…

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Est1 Task 1

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Ferrell, O.C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2009). Business Ethics, Ethical Decision Making and Cases. Chpt. 2, p. 18, Mason, Oh. South-Western Cengage learning.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After reading this chapter on Business Ethics, primarily this case involving Ms. Stewart came to the fore front nationally because she violated the Theory of Amorality, which did not match up with her persona. Martha Stewart made a living reaching , unifying and teaching Americans how to live a "good Life" by doing wholesome, handmade & homemaker type projects. Ms. Stewart exemplified the throwback to a time when American women were schooled in their womanhood and station in life by how she kept her home & her family taken care of. Generally we think of those times when people were honest and genuinely cared to do what is morally right. Her entire fortune was based on her catch phrase of "its a good thing" and educating American working women how to take care of…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    she knew her company Martha Stewart living Omni media would see a negative impact because it was associated with ImClone, so she sold some of her shares and because of that she was charged with manipulating the price of the stock of he own company. But by expressing her innocence that was charge was later thrown out (McGee, 2008). Ultimately she was guilty for everything, but the primary legal issues were from Stewarts conspiracy to defraud the investigators. The verdict, “ Martha Stewart was convicted of conspiracy and obstruction of justice in an insider trading case in 2004, and her punishment was five-months jail sentence, five-month house arrest two-year probation, and a $30,000 fine” (Source). Many believed her sentence was too lenient.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Martha Stewart is an American Home decorator Icon surrounded by accusations of Inside trading, Obstruction of justice, False statements and Conspiracy. Her trial and investigation lasted for two years ending with her being found guilty of charges and convicted to spend time in jail, home arrest and probation. In this work I will expose Martha Stewart’s behavior and why her actions were considered outlaw, unethical and unprofessional. I will also explain which ethical behavior she used and how that affects her image, financial status, social position, fame and followers.…

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Martha Stewart

    • 2960 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Martha Stewart is the founder of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, L.L.C. (MSLO). Since Martha is an icon known for her imagination and creativity, no wonder that it is reflected in her products. They are comparable to the top brands in the country, which shows her class. MSLO is comprised of four business units. They are Publishing, Internet, Broadcasting and Merchandising. Its headquarters is in New York and it employs approximately 760 people with annual turnover of $327.9 million dollars (Martha-Stewart-Living-Omnimedia,-Inc.).…

    • 2960 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    3. (January 2012) Ferrell, O.C. And John Fraedrich. “Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making & Cases.” Cengage Learning, 9th edition.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    "In 2002, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that Martha Stewart was under investigation for insider trading. She had sold 3,928 shares of ImClone Systems in December 2001, just before the Food & Drug Administration announced that it was scuttling ImClone's application to sell a new so-called wonder drug. It looked like classic insider trading, and it probably was, but oddly the feds never proved this in court, or even tried to prove it. Instead, they charged Stewart with four crimes (conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and two counts of making false statements to federal agents), all stemming from her conversations with investigators. A jury found her guilty, and she was sentenced to five months in prison. Under federal law,…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Masters, B. "Securities Charge Could Be Biggest Threat to Stewart" The Washington Post 19 Jun. 2003, final ed.: E2…

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Legal&Ethical

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. Stewart was not an insider of ImClone and she received the tip from her stockbroker. Does she have an ethical obligation to ask where the tip came from or why the broker was recommending selling the stock? Does the fact that Stewart was an officer and director of a publicly traded corporation require her to use higher ethical standards when buying and selling stock of other companies?…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Study Of Barry Minkow

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He claimed that the President of Herbalife, Gregory Probert lied about having a Masters of Business Administration degree. Mr. Probert claimed in 19 SEC filings that he had the required degree from the California State University, but upon further investigation from Barry Minkow’s company it was determined that Mr. Probert did not have a degree in which he claimed (Winstein, 2008). The day this information was made public, the stock for Herbalife took a downfall and was priced at $40.08, it took a 9% hit. Barry Minkow made $50,000 after this stock took a nosedive. This activity proved to be legitimate because both the FBI and SEC had access to the trade account prior to anything occurring, and Minkow had revealed to them that he was betting that the stock would dip. (Bauder,…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays