Preview

Jury Nullification Research Paper

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1057 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jury Nullification Research Paper
Jury Nullification Paper
Following the American Psychological Association’s Guide
Kristina Wilson
University of Phoenix
CJA/ 344

The act of jury nullification occurs when a jury comes back with a verdict of not guilty despite the belief that the defendant is guilty of what he or she is charged with. This generally takes place when a jury finds a law is not morally right or that it does not associate with the defendant. “Jurors decide to disregard judicial instructions and arrive at their own resolution of all contested matters of law at trial” (Jenkins & Moore, 2004, p. 1).
Although a jury has the right to nullify, most judges do not notify juries of this right for fear of abuse of the system. The reason being, this
…show more content…
While there are not many cases in which jury nullification exist are made public, it has been practiced with juries across the country, especially on non-violent drug offenses. “In New Hampshire, for example, a Rastafarian man named Doug Darrell, who had been growing marijuana in his backyard for purposes of personal consumption, was brought before a jury on felony drug charges. The evidence against Darrell was substantial; he had been clearly in violation of the law. Nonetheless, his jurors—who found themselves morally opposed to the sort of law that would send a peaceful man to prison—explicitly decided to nullify the case against him by finding him not guilty” (Bassil, 2012, para. …show more content…
(2012, October 9). Jury nullification in America. The Chronicle. Retrieved from http://www.dukechronicle.com/articles/2012/10/10/jury-nullification-america
Jenkins, M., & Moore, B. (2004). Just Deserts? University Students’ Inclination to nullify the Law: An Exploratory Study. Internet Journal of Criminology, 1-29. Retrieved from http://www.internetjournalofcriminology.com/Jenkins%20%20Moore%20-%20Just%20Deserts.pdf
Rottman, Ph.D., D. B., Hansen, R., Mott, Ph.D., N., & Grimes, L. (2003, March). Perceptions of the Courts in Your Community: The Influence of Experience, Race and Ethnicity. 1-10. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/201356.pdf
Schrantz, D. (2000). Reducing Racial Disparity in the Criminal Justice System: A Manual for Practitioners and Policymakers. National Criminal Justice Reference Service,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Trial By Jury

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Juries don’t have to provide any reasoning, making it exceedingly tough to distinguish whether juries have truly understood the evidence in order to acquire a just verdict. Monitoring a juror’s attitude and how seriously they are taking their duty is also, in essence, unachievable due to the Contempt of Court Act 1981. The act states it is inadmissible of the court “to obtain, solicit or disclose any statements made, opinions expressed, arguments advanced or votes cast” (Dodd, 2012). Consequently, section 8 makes any justifiable investigation into jury deliberation very…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Include contemporary examples ( within the last 10 years ) of ethnicity-based jury nullification. Note: you can use news articles ]…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    cja 344

    • 1286 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jury Nullification “It is not only the juror’s right, but his duty to find the verdict according to his own best understanding, judgment, and conscience, though in direct opposition to the direction of the court.” This is what John Adams said of jury nullification. John Jay, who was the first justice of the Supreme Court said, “The jury has the right to judge both the law as well as the fact in controversy.” So what is jury nullification and how does it influence courtroom proceedings and judicial practices? The definition of jury nullification according to thefreedictionary.com website jury nullification is defined as a sanctioned doctrine wherein members of a jury disregard either the evidence presented or the…

    • 1286 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    A stage-level analysis is the examination of disparities at each different stage in the judicial process. Wooldredge argues that disparate treatment of races during the stages of their case processing may help account for large variation in incarceration between different racial/age demographics. Over 5,000 felony cases from urban areas in Ohio were included in his study. Specifically, Wooldredge analyzed how race’s impact on sentencing changed when controlling for legal and extra-legal factors such as age, sex, employment status (2012). The study found that there was no significant difference in sentencing between African Americans and Caucasians when controlling for the severity of the crime committed. However, Wooldredge argues, that does not mean there is no racial bias in the process as a whole. Disparities in the treatment of minorities’ early stages of their case process could certainly account for differences in sentencing severity and rates. Black males between the ages of 18 and 29 receive much harsher treatment in the pre-trial stages. They are less likely to be released on their own recognizance and their bail is likely to be higher than their white counterparts. The author concludes hypothesizing that the differences in pre-trial treatment of black and white defendants are likely connected to sentencing disparities.…

    • 3561 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury Nullification Paper

    • 1023 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In this paper I am going to explain whether ethnicity influences courtroom proceedings and judicial practices, and give some examples of ethnicity-based jury nullification, a sanctioned doctrine of trial proceedings wherein members of a jury disregard either the evidence presented of the instructions of the judge in order to reach a verdict based upon their own consciences. It espouses the concept that jurors should be the judges of both law and fact.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Jury nullification occurs when a jury returns a verdict that is the opposite of what the jury believes or the verdict it was instructed to return by the court” (Rottenstein Law Group, 2014). In the course of a regular criminal trial, the judge will hand down some directives to the jury. The judge will inform the jury that they should set aside any feelings that they may take personal and achieve a decision exclusively in light of the truth displayed at trial. However, juries overlook these directions and clear criminals who plainly disobeyed the law. Current lawful guidelines firmly disapproval jury nullification and restrict encouragements for a jury panel to nullify the law. Therefore, a legal counselor may not, even with the within the…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury Nullification CJA 344 October 6, 2014 Johnny Cotton Jury nullification is defined as when juries believe a case is unjust or wrong and may set free a defendant who violated the law. Jury nullification has been an option of a jury in the United States. In the legal system that we use today, jurors have the power to give a non-guilty verdict even when the evidence clearly shows that the defendant is guilty. In cases like this, the jurors decide that the certain laws should not be applied to the particular case or that the laws are unjust for the case. In other cases the jurors may believe that the laws are certainly bias against the defendant to begin with. The 14th amendment in our Constitution promises that all persons no matter race,…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just like how police officers and prosecutors can make discretionary decision; Jury nullification is simply a power granted to jury to make discretion regarding whether criminal punishment is appropriate in a given case. Just as police and prosecutors take into consideration as whether the defendant’s behavior was a technical violation or whether other circumstances not recognized by the law justified or excused a defendant’s actions; it serves jury nullification to get rid of inappropriate prosecutions where police and prosecutors failed to do so. So when critics criticize jury nullification without knowing that similar judgments are being made by police officers and prospectors, people who have such bias view don't even realize their argument…

    • 135 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury Trial Research Paper

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The advantage of having a trial by jury allows a sort of "second trial." For example, in the movie Twelve Angry Men, every single jury member voted guilty, except for one. The other eleven men demanded his reasons for voting Not Guilty, and he gave them. In the end, they voted Not Guilty unanimously. Now, the defendant in question was charged with murder, to which the penalty was death by electrocution. However, the evidence, which most of the jury members did not question, was not as sound as they thought, and the man that voted Not guilty showed them that. If the defendant hadn't had a jury, then he would have been sentenced to death, whether he was guilty or not, due to the meager and circumstantial evidence…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury nullification is a situation where the jury gives a non guilty judgment to a defendant whom he has evidence that he is guilty of the offence based on various reasons. It occurs when there is enough evidence to convict the defendant but the jury is persuaded that conviction is being injustice to the accused. Jury nullification is mainly based on the race of the defendant or the unjustness of the ruling against the defendant among other factors (Rivera, 2006).…

    • 365 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury Nullification

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The definition of jury nullification according to thefreedictionary.com website jury nullification is defined as a sanctioned doctrine wherein members of a jury disregard either the evidence presented or the instructions of the judge in order to reach a verdict based upon their own consciences. It espouses the concept that jurors should be the judges of both law and fact. The doctrine of jury nullification is based one important things, one that a juror can never be punished for the verdict they bring back to the judge, and second that a defendant cannot ever be retried once the jury has returned to the courtroom with a not guilty verdict.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Opponents of race-based jury nullification believe that a jury should defend the laws of the country and base their decisions on the facts of the case. These people believe juries should not consider a person’s race or express opposition of laws in this manner. Some of these people believe that this process may allow dangerous criminals back into society with no repercussions for their actions. People who oppose race-based jury nullification believe that a person’s sentiments should not become a factor when making a decision about a case.…

    • 2047 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jury nullification is “a jury’s knowing and deliberate rejection of the evidence or refusal to apply the law either because the jury wants to send a message about some social issue that is larger than the case itself or because the result dictated by law is contrary to the jury’s sense of justice, morality, or fairness” (Keneally, 2010, p. 942). Nowadays ethnicity does not influence courtroom proceedings and judicial practices. Mainly is money that influences such. On the flipside, the jury has to be diverse so that the decision is unbiased.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jury Nullification

    • 1510 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A situation that gives the jury a judgment of nonguilty is known as jury nullification. These situations involve a defendant who has evidence against him or her proving him or her guilty for the alleged offenses for various reasons. This occurs when the evidence is enough to incarcerate a victim but the jury feels confident that conviction is a form of injustice shown toward the accused. In this paper the subject to examine is jury nullification as well as the opinoins of it more closely. The main factor considered in jury nullification is race when it refers to the defendant; the ruling of the defendant is considered unjust. People think that jurors should take this into consideration when dealing with situations in which the defendant is a minority and will be automatically mistreated by the law; this is the most important factor to consider when bringing oneness in the court systems of America. They believe that jury nullification surrounding race is the primary way to promote change and lower the level of racial discrimination in the law courts of American. The judge should give his judgment based on the facts presented not racial injustices and equalities; he should use wisdom as well as experience.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Jury Selection

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The jury pool is initially chosen from among the community utilizing a random strategy. Jury records are gathered from voter enlistments and driver permit/state id. From these records, some people are mailed. They will be addressed in court by the judge and/or lawyers in the U.S. According to Shari Seidman, in some cases such as capital punishment, the jury must be death qualified. Jury procedures are taught in law institutions to law students. The jury chose is said to have been…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays