Preview

Jury Nullification

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1103 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jury Nullification
Jury Nullification

Jury Nullification
Natalie Popoff
CJA/344
Torria Richardson

Jury Nullification “It is not only the juror’s right, but his duty to find the verdict according to his own best understanding, judgment, and conscience, though in direct opposition to the direction of the court.” This is what John Adams said of jury nullification. John Jay, who was the first justice of the Supreme Court said, “The jury has the right to judge both the law as well as the fact in controversy.” So what is jury nullification and how does it influence courtroom proceedings and judicial practices? The definition of jury nullification according to thefreedictionary.com website jury nullification is defined as a sanctioned doctrine wherein members of a jury disregard either the evidence presented or the instructions of the judge in order to reach a verdict based upon their own consciences. It espouses the concept that jurors should be the judges of both law and fact. The doctrine of jury nullification is based one important things, one that a juror can never be punished for the verdict they bring back to the judge, and second that a defendant cannot ever be retried once the jury has returned to the courtroom with a not guilty verdict. The first case of jury nullification in British law dates back to 1670 in trial of William Mead and William Penn, (William Penn would later go on to be the founder of the Province of Pennsylvania) these two men were charged in England for unlawful assembly, which was a law that was aimed at preventing different religious groups that were not noticed by the crown from worshipping. Both of these men were clearly guilty of breaking the law according to British law and the judge presiding over the case demanded that the jury find William Mean and William Penn guilty, but the jury refused to find these two men guilty because they felt that the law itself
Jury Nullification

Was unjust. The judge continued to insist that the



References: http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/jury+nullification http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,163877,00.html http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig10/emal1.1.1.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Trial By Jury

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It isn’t arduous to see why some may question the efficiency of trial by jury and whether it should, and is able to, continue to discover innocence or guilt. Regarding the trial of Vicky Pryce, the failure of the jury within the hearing conjured ridicule and disdain from the judge and the media. The case deeply unsettled the trust of many in the system. The eight women and four men were dismissed after illustrating “fundamental deficits of understanding” (Jacobson, Hunter & Kirby, 2015, p. 55). Their profuse questions for the judge were deemed as unintelligent and unnecessary and so a costly re-trial was required. Consequently, this ordeal provoked a stronger desire for the abolition of trial by jury, to be replaced by a single judge as a more…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If an action is triable of right by a jury, a jury trial still must be affirmatively…

    • 2857 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    cja 344

    • 1286 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jury Nullification “It is not only the juror’s right, but his duty to find the verdict according to his own best understanding, judgment, and conscience, though in direct opposition to the direction of the court.” This is what John Adams said of jury nullification. John Jay, who was the first justice of the Supreme Court said, “The jury has the right to judge both the law as well as the fact in controversy.” So what is jury nullification and how does it influence courtroom proceedings and judicial practices? The definition of jury nullification according to thefreedictionary.com website jury nullification is defined as a sanctioned doctrine wherein members of a jury disregard either the evidence presented or the…

    • 1286 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Nullification Crisis was a sectional crisis in 1832-1833 that involved a confrontation between South Carolina and the Federal Government. Andrew Jackson was the president while this was happening. The crisis guranteed after South Carolina declared that the federal Tariffs of 1828 and 1832 were unconstitutional and for that…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    . The nullification controversy of 1832 was a major milestone in the national debate over federal versus state authority. Coming at a time when agitation over slavery and other issues that tended to divide the country along sectional lines was growing, the nullification controversy brought the states’ rights debate into sharp focus.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a trial overseen by a petit jury, the jurors must be unanimous in their decision to convict or acquit. If the jury is split one way or another, the judge will declare either a hung jury or a mistrial, and the prosecution can try the case again if the people wish. However, a grand jury does not have to be unanimous. The exact number or jurors varies from state-to-state, but in federal grand…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The jury system is simply a system in which the verdict in a legal case is decided by a group of twelve regular citizens(the jurors). A lot of questions have been asked about the validity and importance of the jury system. I think the jury system is not a good idea and should therefore be removed because the jurors sometimes do not consider or even understand the evidence provides. They often let their personal feelings affect their verdict, or base it on unreasonable factors, and…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury Nullification CJA 344 October 6, 2014 Johnny Cotton Jury nullification is defined as when juries believe a case is unjust or wrong and may set free a defendant who violated the law. Jury nullification has been an option of a jury in the United States. In the legal system that we use today, jurors have the power to give a non-guilty verdict even when the evidence clearly shows that the defendant is guilty. In cases like this, the jurors decide that the certain laws should not be applied to the particular case or that the laws are unjust for the case. In other cases the jurors may believe that the laws are certainly bias against the defendant to begin with. The 14th amendment in our Constitution promises that all persons no matter race,…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just like how police officers and prosecutors can make discretionary decision; Jury nullification is simply a power granted to jury to make discretion regarding whether criminal punishment is appropriate in a given case. Just as police and prosecutors take into consideration as whether the defendant’s behavior was a technical violation or whether other circumstances not recognized by the law justified or excused a defendant’s actions; it serves jury nullification to get rid of inappropriate prosecutions where police and prosecutors failed to do so. So when critics criticize jury nullification without knowing that similar judgments are being made by police officers and prospectors, people who have such bias view don't even realize their argument…

    • 135 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury nullification is a situation where the jury gives a non guilty judgment to a defendant whom he has evidence that he is guilty of the offence based on various reasons. It occurs when there is enough evidence to convict the defendant but the jury is persuaded that conviction is being injustice to the accused. Jury nullification is mainly based on the race of the defendant or the unjustness of the ruling against the defendant among other factors (Rivera, 2006).…

    • 365 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This prevents them from making decisions based on what they saw someone do and not what they believe is right. Instead of basing their decisions on other court cases, they can make proper judgements on the current case and be open minded and not bias. Additionally, although various court cases are similar, there is always something different. So relying on a different case to make your decision will make the jury blind to the different facts presented. This will cause the jury to make wrong decisions even when the defendant or plaintiff proves their side. This shows that it is lawful for a judge to prevent the jury from being influenced by other…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Right To Twelve Jurors

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As I said above, both state and federal proceedings grant an individual a trial by jury. However, as several cases have determined, a jury of twelve persons is not required. In the case of Williams v. Florida (1970), the court approved the a six-person jury. Then in the case of Brown v. Louisiana (1980), the supreme court ruled that under the Sixth Amendment jury can consist of 6-12 jurors, as long as the decision is unanimous (Ingram, 2009). If the decision of the six-person jury is not unanimous then it will not be approved; therefore, it will not meet the requirements of the Sixth Amendment right to a trial by jury. It is believed that a jury less than six persons will not allow for a proper deliberation and the decision may be based on…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil cases are legal dispute between two or more parties that begins when a party files a complaint about civil actions (United States Courts, 2017). The party filing the complaint will file a fee required by status and a plaintiff who is unable to pay the fee may file a request to proceed in forma pauperis (United States Courts, 2017). Seeking money to compensate for damages or asking the court to stop a conduct that is causing hard is a civil case. The actions for a civil case includes providing information to each other with witnesses, copies of documentation related to the cas, and preparing for a trial by requiring litigants to assemble evidence and call witnesses (United States Courts, 2017). Furthermore, witness is require to answer questions from lawyer under oath while court reporter produces word-for-word account called a transcript (United States Courts, 2017).…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    to be a new trial. Although the idea of jury nullification is beneficial to the society, problems…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Due Process

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A jury trial is a vital stage in the process; all of the investigation that has taken place concerning the accused person will be presented during this process. A jury trial is made up of twelve citizens of the community who have been randomly selected to serve on the jury. The jury had been given the authority to judge the facts of the case, and them apply the law that was given by the judge to those facts, and render a verdict of guilty or not guilty.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays