Preview

CJA 344 Week 3 Team Assignment Jury Nullification Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
370 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
CJA 344 Week 3 Team Assignment Jury Nullification Paper
This paperwork of CJA 344 Week 3 Discussion Questions consists of:

DQ 1: Racial minorities comprise a very small proportion of the lawyers and judges in the United States. What accounts for this? What difference, if any, would it make if more of the lawyers representing criminal defendants were racial minorities?

DQ 2: Those who champion the appointment or election of racial minorities to the bench argue that African American and Hispanic judges might make a difference. Explain why. Law - General Law Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper in which you address the following:

Explain whether ethnicity influences courtroom proceedings and judicial practices. Summarize the arguments for and against ethnicity-based jury nullification. Include contemporary examples ( within the last 10 years ) of ethnicity-based jury nullification. Note: you can use news articles ] Conclude by choosing a position for or against ethnicity-based jury nullification and defend your decision.

Use at least three peer-review sources published within the last six years from scholarly journals. Websites will not count towards scholarly journals requirement. Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.. Are you currently in college, but have no idea what you want for a major? If you are, then chances are you aren't alone. There are many people who haven't selected a major yet, and that's fine. You still have enough time to choose a good major, and the following tips will help you make your choice.

This paperwork of CJA 344 Week 3 Discussion Questions consists of:

DQ 1: Racial minorities comprise a very small proportion of the lawyers and judges in the United States. What accounts for this? What difference, if any, would it make if more of the lawyers representing criminal defendants were racial minorities?

DQ 2: Those ...

Find needed answers here - https://bitly.com/12BlGrQ

Are you contemplating college, but

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Trial By Jury

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Ford 1989 case, the Court of Appeal upheld that there is no right to a multiracial jury. Ford appealed for multi-ethnic jurors which was repudiated by the judge. It was deemed that the method of random selection in use was the most appropriate approach to take in attaining a just verdict. The judge had no right or justification to release any able jurors with the sole purpose of acquiring a multiracial jury. If a judge discharged a juror without good reason, there could be allegations of partiality and jury tampering within the trial. The idea of removing jurors, based on their ethnicity, is also scornfully depreciatory of the members of jury who have to leave as a result. In order to confirm that juries demonstrate public integrity, it is vital to ensure that the procedure of jury selection is extensive, and not underrepresenting ethnic…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    · Conclude by choosing a position for or against ethnicity-based jury nullification and defend your decision.…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. What has been the role of the Supreme Court in addressing racial bias since the beginning of the Drug War?…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second question asks how does the case illustrate the application of new technology to solving issues that have never been tied to technology? Can you think of other ways technology might be used to address diversity/EEO/affirmative action issues?…

    • 860 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many factors that should be taken into consideration when debating on what the biggest problems are not only in the justice system but also in the court system, many of them being seen throughout the novel Monster by Walter Dean Myers. For instance, race seems to still be an issue in today’s justice system. One example on how race is a problem in the justice system is on the case of Clarence Brandley. Clarence was realized from jail after being wrongfully convicted and on death row for almost one decade as it states in the Montana Abolition Coalition article. Another problem in the justice system is the death penalty. One reason why the death penalty is a problem is because innocent people can be executed as it also states in the Montana Abolition Coalition article. One final problem out of the many is the the court system is actually the jury. For example as it is stated in the article jurs are supposed to be representative of our diverse community (Ladner,2000).…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Spann, Girardeau A. Race against the Court: Supreme Court and Minorities in Contemporary America. New York: New York University Press, 1993.…

    • 3133 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Great Society Dbq

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages

    32) a & b) The approach to bring discrimination cases before the courts that I would have disagreed with most would have been using violence to gain attention. This approach only caused an uproar that required law enforcement and resulted in injuries of many people. Although it did bring attention, it brought…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PSY328 final proposal

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Juries represent the ordinary public and therefore are more likely to judge in line with generally accepted values of the society. Justice and equity are the standards of an eligible jury, and the jury selection is meant to ensure “counterbalancing of biases” or canceling out individual biases (Hastie, Penrod & Pennington, 1983). However, jury trials are often vulnerable to the effects of prejudice and stereotypes of the jury, by geographical or historical factors, and it tend to be harmful to certain groups. For example, juror characteristics, such as gender, religion, education level, socio-economic status (Hastie et al., 1983; Wrighstman, Kassim & Willis, 1987), and racial prejudices (Urszbat, 2005). And attorneys’ intonation, posture, attractiveness, confidence, and credibility also affect juries’ perception and their judgments (Jakubaszek, 2014). Most significant, the characteristics of defendants like gender and age would affect jury decision making (Pazzulo, Dempsey, Meader & Allen, 2010). These prejudices and stereotypes cause in-group-out-group bias during the trial process. In-group bias means in-group favoritism that refers to the fact that under certain conditions people will preference and have an affinity for one’s in-group over the out-group, or anyone viewed as outside the in-group. It is usually expressed in one 's evaluation of others, linking, allocation of resources and many other ways (Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D. & Akert, R. D., 2009). And out-group bias is the phenomenon in which an out-group is perceived as being threatening to the members of an in-group ( Hewstone, M.; Rubin, M.; Willis, H., 2002) defined as out-group derogation. It is a matter of favoritism towards an in-group and the absence of equivalent favoritism towards an out-group (Brewers, Marilynn B., 1999). Outgroup derogation often…

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Prejudices play an important role in a jury's decision. Explain the prejudices of three jurors and how those prejudices affect their voting.…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Majority of the times setting criminals free to commit the same crimes again. Being acquitted of all charges is usually how jury nullifications occur. Many believe that racial nullification should be possible for those that have committed non-violent crimes even if the evidence shows that the person is in fact guilty. The contribution to the criminal justice system is that this would allow the prison system to have more space for those that commit more violent crimes regardless of their race. As we see jury nullification can either be beneficial or it can truly destroy the criminal justice system. Courtrooms need to recognize that there needs to be no biases within the system or people need to be blindfolded before being a part of a case. There needs to be a model set forth in regards to the influence that justice should outweigh any feelings in regards to race and one should serve time for the crime that they was convicted of. African American, or Hispanic or minorities races apply society ought to come close to their effort and be aware of its supporting nature and their choice to practice their authority in benefit of their…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Historical Report

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages

    | Search the Internet for groups and organizations promoting racial equality to help you complete this assignment. You may also refer to the Internet Resource Directory in Ch. 13 of Racial and Ethnic Groups.Using the information from the text and your web search:Identify one racial group from the list below: African American Asian American Middle Eastern American Hispanic American/Latino Native AmericanWrite a 750- to 1,050-word paper from one of the perspectives below: A historian writing about the racial group in a book chapter A news reporter writing a newspaper article or blog entry about the racial group An individual member of the racial group, writing a personal letter to a friend who is not a member of that racial groupAnswer the following questions: What have been the experiences of this racial group throughout U.S. history? What have been the political, social, and cultural issues and concerns throughout American history? What legislation meant to constrain race within prejudicial boundaries was enacted? How did the various groups you researched fight this legislation? What legislation meant to alleviate prejudicial boundaries has been enacted? How did the various groups you researched promote this legislation?Answer the following questions: What have been the experiences of this racial group throughout U.S. history? What have been the political, social, and cultural issues and concerns throughout American history? What legislation meant to constrain race within prejudicial boundaries was enacted? How did the various groups you researched fight this legislation? What legislation meant to alleviate prejudicial boundaries has been enacted? How did the various groups you researched promote this legislation?…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people view that the jurors should consider this option when they are faced with situation where the defendant is from a minority and he is persuaded that the law is unjust to the defendant. Some people believe that this is the only way to bring equality in our courts of law. They believe that jury nullification based on race is the only way to bring change and reduce racial discrimination in the American law courts. The judgment issued by the judge is not supposed to be wholly based on facts but should consider factors such as the racial injustices and inequalities based on their wisdom and experience. Otherwise a machine can effectively replace the judges (Rivera, 2006).…

    • 365 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jury nullification is “a jury’s knowing and deliberate rejection of the evidence or refusal to apply the law either because the jury wants to send a message about some social issue that is larger than the case itself or because the result dictated by law is contrary to the jury’s sense of justice, morality, or fairness” (Keneally, 2010, p. 942). Nowadays ethnicity does not influence courtroom proceedings and judicial practices. Mainly is money that influences such. On the flipside, the jury has to be diverse so that the decision is unbiased.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jury Nullification

    • 1547 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Jury nullification occurs when a jury releases a person who is found guilty of a crime that they are being charged with. When a defendant is found not guilty by a jury, the facts of the case and/or the judge 's recommendation regarding the law are not taken seriously, instead the jury bases it vote on their own conscience. When the race of the defendant has any determinant on the outcome of the juries’ decision to drop charges despite the overwhelming amount of evidence, race based jury nullification becomes the case. “Unfortunately, there is no way to prevent jury nullification from occurring because members of a jury cannot be ordered to convict or suffer consequences for acquitting a defendant. A jury acquittal, under the Constitution, is final” (Conrad, 1999, pg.1 para.1).…

    • 1547 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the last few years, however, a new and potentially even more damaging line of inquiry has emerged -- the idea that racial preferences may materially harm the very people they intended to benefit… My research over the last two years, using recent data that track more than 30,000 law students and lawyers, has documented even more serious and pervasive mismatch effects in legal education. Elite law schools offer very substantial racial preferences for blacks, Hispanics and American Indians in order to create student bodies that are as racially diverse as their applicant pools. Because these elite schools admit the black students that second-tier law schools would normally admit, second-tier schools, to keep up their minority numbers, also offer big racial preferences. The result is a cascade effect down the law school hierarchy, leaving 80 percent to 90 percent of black students at significantly more selective schools than they would get into strictly on their academic…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics