Preview

Jury Nullification

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1547 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jury Nullification
Jury Nullification Paper
CJA/344
April 13, 2013
Johnny Cotton

Jury Nullification Paper
Jury nullification occurs when a jury releases a person who is found guilty of a crime that they are being charged with. When a defendant is found not guilty by a jury, the facts of the case and/or the judge 's recommendation regarding the law are not taken seriously, instead the jury bases it vote on their own conscience. When the race of the defendant has any determinant on the outcome of the juries’ decision to drop charges despite the overwhelming amount of evidence, race based jury nullification becomes the case. “Unfortunately, there is no way to prevent jury nullification from occurring because members of a jury cannot be ordered to convict or suffer consequences for acquitting a defendant. A jury acquittal, under the Constitution, is final” (Conrad, 1999, pg.1 para.1). When the topic of race-based jury nullification is discussed, all races involved should focus primarily on their personal perception of the events that transpired, rather than the races of the citizens involved. Racial jury nullification is known to be a hotly debatable topic whether society is for or against it. Both parties have strong opinions and facts to support their thoughts coupled with many reasons to support their opinion. The effects of such major differences in opinions definitely takes its toll on minorities and their trust within America’s criminal justice system. When racial jury nullification was recognized and became a serious issue, many communities decided to make sure a certain number of minorities are placed on the jury to ensure there would not be as many cases where racial biases could ultimately determine the final decision made on a defendant. In addition to making sure a certain amount of minorities compose every jury, judges always remind jurors to go into the jury room with the understanding that the races involved have no place in the final decision of the case.



References: Brasch, W. (2009). Twelve angry white people: Jury nullification in a Pennsylvania coal town. Retrieved from http://pubrecord.org/nation/2069/twelve-angry-white-people-jury- nullification-in-a-Pennsylvania-coal-town/ Conrad, C. (1999). Symposium.(juries nullifying unjust laws). Retrieved from http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-54736559.html Harris, D. (2006). Racial profiling (2nd ed.). Detroit, MI.: Greenhaven Press. King, N. (2003). Jury Nullification Is Unfair. Retrieved from http://www.enotes.com/legal- system-article/jury-nullification-unfair Rivera, D. (2006). Race Based Jury Nullification. Retrieved from http://voices.yahoo.com/race- based-jury-nullification-28921.html?cat=17

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Trial By Jury

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Ford 1989 case, the Court of Appeal upheld that there is no right to a multiracial jury. Ford appealed for multi-ethnic jurors which was repudiated by the judge. It was deemed that the method of random selection in use was the most appropriate approach to take in attaining a just verdict. The judge had no right or justification to release any able jurors with the sole purpose of acquiring a multiracial jury. If a judge discharged a juror without good reason, there could be allegations of partiality and jury tampering within the trial. The idea of removing jurors, based on their ethnicity, is also scornfully depreciatory of the members of jury who have to leave as a result. In order to confirm that juries demonstrate public integrity, it is vital to ensure that the procedure of jury selection is extensive, and not underrepresenting ethnic…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Include contemporary examples ( within the last 10 years ) of ethnicity-based jury nullification. Note: you can use news articles ]…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If both of the African-Americans attend the jury stand, they can go in favor of Woodson and potentially the jurors will not have a unanimous decision for the final verdict. In the jury trail, the plaintiff and the defendant in the jury selection could reject one of the jurors without having a reason in addition, certain numbers of likely jurors who appear to have an unfavorable bias for the Woodson trial.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is why the film Twelve Angry Men suggest that The United States Judicial system is very unfair to the person being tried because they don't check into the juror members enough which can lead to a very unfair jury…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    CCJS 370 Study Guide

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages

    - if you are a juror that is black we can remove from the jury…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PSY328 final proposal

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Juries represent the ordinary public and therefore are more likely to judge in line with generally accepted values of the society. Justice and equity are the standards of an eligible jury, and the jury selection is meant to ensure “counterbalancing of biases” or canceling out individual biases (Hastie, Penrod & Pennington, 1983). However, jury trials are often vulnerable to the effects of prejudice and stereotypes of the jury, by geographical or historical factors, and it tend to be harmful to certain groups. For example, juror characteristics, such as gender, religion, education level, socio-economic status (Hastie et al., 1983; Wrighstman, Kassim & Willis, 1987), and racial prejudices (Urszbat, 2005). And attorneys’ intonation, posture, attractiveness, confidence, and credibility also affect juries’ perception and their judgments (Jakubaszek, 2014). Most significant, the characteristics of defendants like gender and age would affect jury decision making (Pazzulo, Dempsey, Meader & Allen, 2010). These prejudices and stereotypes cause in-group-out-group bias during the trial process. In-group bias means in-group favoritism that refers to the fact that under certain conditions people will preference and have an affinity for one’s in-group over the out-group, or anyone viewed as outside the in-group. It is usually expressed in one 's evaluation of others, linking, allocation of resources and many other ways (Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D. & Akert, R. D., 2009). And out-group bias is the phenomenon in which an out-group is perceived as being threatening to the members of an in-group ( Hewstone, M.; Rubin, M.; Willis, H., 2002) defined as out-group derogation. It is a matter of favoritism towards an in-group and the absence of equivalent favoritism towards an out-group (Brewers, Marilynn B., 1999). Outgroup derogation often…

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the sole dissent of the Plessey v. Ferguson case, Justice Harlan proclaimed that “[o]ur Constitution in color-blind and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens” (Linder, 2016). Yet trials in America have long included conversations about race, such as with the infamous O. J. Simpson trial. Legal distinctions based on race are also frequently made, such as is done when considering college admission. These conversations and distinctions are allowed because in reality, neither the Constitution nor the American justice system are truly color-blind. Nor should they be; a color-conscious Constitution and justice system allow America an attempt to make up for past sins, such as the ruling of Plessey v. Ferguson.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The role the jury trial plays in criminal cases is fundamental to the American scheme of justice.1 The right to a jury trial is rooted in our legal tradition2 and is articulated in the U.S. Constitution.3 This protection extends back to British common law, and serves as a check against government oppression by ensuring that a defendant’s fate lies in the hands of a jury of ordinary citizens rather than the government’s prosecutor or judge.4 Coupled with the presumption of innocence, the right to a jury trial serves as a “cornerstone of Anglo-Saxon justice”5 that limits potential government tyranny. At the heart of jury trial protections and the presumption of innocence lies the concern that it is better to let a guilty man go free than to convict an innocent man.6…

    • 8780 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Majority of the times setting criminals free to commit the same crimes again. Being acquitted of all charges is usually how jury nullifications occur. Many believe that racial nullification should be possible for those that have committed non-violent crimes even if the evidence shows that the person is in fact guilty. The contribution to the criminal justice system is that this would allow the prison system to have more space for those that commit more violent crimes regardless of their race. As we see jury nullification can either be beneficial or it can truly destroy the criminal justice system. Courtrooms need to recognize that there needs to be no biases within the system or people need to be blindfolded before being a part of a case. There needs to be a model set forth in regards to the influence that justice should outweigh any feelings in regards to race and one should serve time for the crime that they was convicted of. African American, or Hispanic or minorities races apply society ought to come close to their effort and be aware of its supporting nature and their choice to practice their authority in benefit of their…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Sacco-Vanzetti Trial

    • 2254 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In examining the events of the Sacco and Vanzetti trial, we found not only the undertones of the social issues of the 1920's, but also a major flaw in our American judicial process. We have not hoped to prove the guilt or innocence of Sacco and Vanzetti, but rather to show that these men did not receive a trial based on impartiality and criminal facts alone. It was a trial, instead, of bias, political beliefs, and circumstantial evidence elevated only by playing on the inherent social prejudices of a jury of white American men. The controversy surrounding their innocence will undoubtedly continue throughout the centuries, but the near indisputable fact remains that Sacco and Vanzetti did not receive a fair trial and that racial prejudices can permeate our societal structures to an unfortunate end. The ease with which it entered this infamous trial is reason enough to examine our current system and be aware of its weaknesses. The Sacco-Vanzetti case is proof that justice is often not blind, but instead is a very seeing participant in our systems and our…

    • 2254 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Internet research clearly showed a long history for jury nullification in the US. An explanation of jury nullification, and in particular race based jury nullification, is that it is a method whereby juries nullify unfair laws by declaring guilty defendants not guilty. Race based nullification is where a jury acquits and individual based on their race. This is commonly found in homogenous juries where there is little jury diversity. Past cases such as runaway slave laws and current cases such as police shootings show that race-based nullification is still an issue in modern courtrooms. The conclusion being that jury nullification is an important power necessary for the checks and balances of the judicial system…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A good number of Americans are not happy about a criminal being let free not because the law is unjust, but because he belong to a certain race. They view jury nullification as releasing wrong does back to the society to commit more crimes. The juror should therefore avoid jury nullification and consider the vulgarity of the criminal act committed, the background of the defendant and whether the law is just or not before deciding on this option. Race based jury nullification is subject to misuse by both the white and the black jurors. In many occasions jury nullification has been used to favor a certain race at the expense of the other race. Whites who have committed crimes against the blacks have been set free by juries at the expense of the blacks. Black juries have also misused jury…

    • 365 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury Nullification

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “It is not only the juror’s right, but his duty to find the verdict according to his own best understanding, judgment, and conscience, though in direct opposition to the direction of the court.” This is what John Adams said of jury nullification. John Jay, who was the first justice of the Supreme Court said, “The jury has the right to judge both the law as well as the fact in controversy.” So what is jury nullification and how does it influence courtroom proceedings and judicial practices?…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Krieger suffers from a disease and by law is granted the use of marijuana as a treatment.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Time to Kill

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The play, 12 Angry Men, and the film, A Time to Kill, have a similar theme. In 12 Angry Men, a Latino is accused of stabbing his father to death, where a guilty verdict would mean a death sentence. In A Time to Kill, a black man took the law into his own hands, killing two alleged rapists and the sentence for this man, if found guilty meant death in a gas chamber. The play and film both involve prejudice against two commonly accused minorities in America. All jurors were white and with the combination of racism it made it seem like injustice was certain. For example, Jake Brigance, the lawyer for Carl Lee filed for a change of venue. The reason for this was that he knew the jury would be comprised of white jurors, where his client was of African American decent. He knew that a white jury would be racially prejudicial towards an African American defendant. At this time in America, such an assertion would not have been unfounded.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics