Preview

Is War Is Inevitable Part Of Human Nature

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1093 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is War Is Inevitable Part Of Human Nature
There is a common saying that peace is never bad, war is never good. But if we look back in the history, a thing is clear. That there have been wars since prehistoric ages, they marked an important part of our evolutionary process, and today we still study them with great fascination.So yes, although I don't support war and violence, i have to admit the reality which it is that war and violence are an inevitable part of human nature. I have chosen this topic because war and conflict are a thing which rises an exclamation mark for me and I wanted to dig a little deeper into it.
Most of the experts believe that war is an inevitable part of human nature, whether it is national or global. Freud,for example, believed that all animals are born with potent aggressive instincts and the anthropologist, Goddell claimed, in a detailed and well analyzed
…show more content…
For example France and ISIS or other islamic groups. War between two countries or states will always be present wether they are fighting for independence, for economical problems,revenge,democratic peace, or because of religion. War is inevitable. The leaders of the countries should all get along with each other in order to have the claim that people will will do it. You need to take it step by step in order to achieve a big thing such as the extinction of war, or at least to minimize it. “Make love, not war”.
“We’ve always had wars. Humans are a warring species. Without an army to defend us, someone will always try to conquer us”. These assumptions have become axioms of our culture. They generate despair but also a certain comfort because they relieve us of the responsibility to change. Some politicians and pundits declare that human nature makes peace impossible, that war is built into our genes. They point to research by evolutionary biologists that indicates our closest genetic relatives, the chimpanzees, make war. Therefore a war must be part of our

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    If warfare was just a natural instinct that all humans had then all groups of people around the world would use warfare to further their civilization. Instead, since warfare is an invention of man instead of a natural part of humanity some groups around the world no nothing of warfare whatsoever. Along with these groups there are also many groups, like the Pueblo Indians who only used warfare to defend their civilization, and did not use war to expand their own lands and influence. Had it not been for another group bringing war to them they would have most likely never partaken in war themselves.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Michael Howard's short manifesto has impacted the way many people look at war, and how they start. Michael without a shadow of a doubt states in his essay The Causes Of War, “Force, or the threat of it, may not settle arguments, but it does play a considerable part in determining the structure of the world in which we live.” Although Michael merely shrugs at the claims made by sociobiologists he also brings a few important ideas to the table himself. When Michael discusses the subject of fear in parallel to the idea of U.S joining WW1 he tries to emphasize that as a justifiable reason to take part in the war. The author does so by showing how fear was inevitable in the national community.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Alcock, John. (1978). “Evolution and Human Violence,” in L. L. Farrar, Jr. (ed.), War: A…

    • 9995 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “War never changes.” A memorable quote in the opening of the Fallout games describes exactly how war is. It will always be the same, death of people for others benefits. There will never be an era where peace triumphs war as long as humans live if we continue with how we interact with other countries. It's not all happiness and good times when war strikes, death of thousands, even entire nations are wiped off the planet. Should we continue with war or find some other way to reason with each other?…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Historically, war has been the leading solution for solving conflicts globally. Though combat tactics have become increasingly more sophisticated over many centuries. The ability to affect and change the world through war stayed the same. All the while, the mentality of the public has become increasingly dissociative, and people have less interest on a large scare. From World War I until now, war has constantly evolved, and support has constantly fluctuated.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Warfare Reformatted

    • 2915 Words
    • 8 Pages

    IS WAR A BIOLOGICAL necessity, a sociological inevitability, or just a bad invention? Those who argue for the first view endow man with such pugnacious instincts that some outlet in aggressive behaviour is necessary if man is to reach full human stature. It was this point of view which lay behind William James's famous essay, 'The Moral Equivalent of War', in which he tried to retain the warlike virtues and channel them in new directions. A similar point of view has lain behind the Soviet Union's attempt to make competition between groups rather than between individuals. A basic, competitive, aggressive, warring human nature is assumed, and those who wish to outlaw war or outlaw competitiveness merely try to find new and less socially destructive ways in which these biologically given aspects of man's nature can find expression. Then there are those who take the second view: warfare is the inevitable concomitant of the development of the state, the struggle for land and natural resources, of class societies springing not from the nature of man, but, from the nature of history. War is nevertheless inevitable unless we change our social system and outlaw classes, the struggle for power, and possessions; and in the event of our success warfare would disappear, as a symptom vanishes when the disease is cured.…

    • 2915 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “It seemed clear that wars were not made by generations and their stupidities, but that wars were made instead by something ignorant in the human heart” (Chapter 13, 201)…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Margaret Mead Warfare

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Warfare: An Invention- Not a Biological Necessity, Margaret Mead states that war is a creation of man, not a necessity we need in order to thrive. She begins by stating that those who believe war is a biological necessity see men as aggressive by nature. This natural aggression leads men to need an outlet for their frustration which, in this case, is war. She proceeds to suggest that war is a creation of society. The origins of war, such as the struggle for land and natural resources, are not man’s nature, they are the nature of the society and history. Lastly, Mead points out that war is inevitable until we change our social system and our desire for power and possessions. If this change of system is successful, “warfare would disappear,…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lord of the Flies

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “During the time men live without a common power to keep them all in awe, they are in that condition which is called war; and such a war, as is of every man, against every man” (Hobbes, Leviathan).…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lysistrata And War Essay

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the essay '"'Warfare is only an invention-not a biological necessity'"' Mead emphasizes the point that man was not born with the need to War. She states '"'warfare of this sort is an invention like any other of the inventions in terms we order our lives'"' (Mead 20). This is made clear by the civilizations that she uses as examples who do not know what war is. '"'Does not the absence of war among the Eskimos, just go to confirm the point that it is the state of development of the society which accounts for war and nothing else?'"' (Mead 21). Mead also points out other civilizations that do not have a war per se but do have a form of conflicts. War is created by the civilization and its surroundings that push…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why Nations Go to War

    • 2476 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In John Stoessinger’s work on “Why Nations go to War” he examines ten wars that have occurred since 1914 and the one currently taking place today. These wars include World War One, World War Two, Korean War, Vietnam War, Yugoslavian War, Indo-Pakistani War, Arab-Israel War, Iran-Iraq and Iraq-Kuwait War, War on Terror, and Wars in Rwanda and Darfur. Each of these wars have many things in common, but the one thing that sticks out above many of the other statistics and reasons is that “no nation that began a major war in the twentieth century emerged a winner” (Stoessinger 387). So after reading this quote you begin to ask yourself, why then would a nation choose to start a war and face the difficulties and often tragic outcomes that coincide with war. Stoessinger thesis on why nations go to war: nations go to war out of fear and misconception that leaders have of other nations.…

    • 2476 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse- Pestilence, War, Famine, and Death- rode together during the 20th century to bring war, disease, and starvation to the world. It is estimated that around 88 million people perished as a result of the two world wars, with over half of the dead of WWII being civilians. The war machine residing over the world was anything but humane. It is interesting then that just a few decades later there is growing debate about how war can be made humane, with many proponents of the idea that it has already become more humane. This essay will first raise the question of what it means to be humane and will give a general definition of war, because the definitions you take of those terms can greatly affect your answer. It will assess popular arguments about humane warfare, including the increased value of human life and new technology, which have been said to have made war more humane. It will conclude, however, that although countries of the West may have adopted such characteristics, this is essentially asymmetrical because adversaries of the West do not tend to play by the same rules. Therefore, although war can be made more humane, it is not easy to say to what extent that will happen.…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Countries Go to War

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the biggest reasons why countries go to war with one another is because a country needs land. This factor has driven leaders to declare war on other countries with favorable land for hundreds of years. The wars that focused on gaining land for the “host” country were usually the most brutal in terms of deaths and methods of combat. An example of a war that was based on the land gaining factor was the crusades. The crusade wars took place from about 1000 AD to 1300 AD; an incredibly long thirty decades. Wars can turn from a religious purpose to a territorial purpose and the crusades were a good example of this (doc.1). The crusades were holy wars in which Muslims were targeted. Muslims were said to be of a lower type of people than everyone else. The Muslims tried to fight back as groups started to kill Muslims in their own land to take over the area. The crusades were supposed to protect the new holy land founded by the Catholics but turned into a struggle for small regions that would later on be of no use. The outcomes of the wars were different of both sides. Neither side gained much other than the other side’s culture and ways of living. The Catholics found new ways to build windows while the Muslims were full of…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great Filter Research

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Conflicts between fellow man remain constantly noticed and remembered, preventing humanity from truly achieving peace and unity as a species. An article featured on The Guardian written by Steve Taylor states an early American psychologist’s (William James)’ theory on war is that war’s prevalence is due to the positive psychological effects it brings. James states, “War establishes a sense of unity against the face of a commonly shared threat, binding people together.” The article continues to mention how war supplies a sense of a cohesive community, communal goals, and the inspiration of everyone in the country to act without selfishness and with honor. This supplies the feeling of purpose and meaning, and suppresses the feeling of monotony in everyday life. The most plausible way we can get through this Great Filter is by using technology to enhance our lives rather than using it for self-destructive purposes, and finding different outlets that suppresses the feeling of a monotone lifestyle. James suggests that humans need to find alternative activities to express the positive effects of involving ourselves in a war, that do not include the destruction and rifts created between nations after wars are complete. This leads to the clear idea that “stable, lasting peace” depends on the development and growth of societies with a rich amount of variety and opportunity that can satisfy the most complex human necessities and wants. The article featured on The Guardian details that due to the abundance of societies “unable to [satisfy the basic necessities of mankind]” makes our future expectations of peace look very bleak. With our main focus shifting from war to peace and collaboration between all nations, as well as advancing our technology, our collective knowledge can…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wwii

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages

    War is an ugly event that man has created over time. Darwin once said, “History is a battle of nations and races against one another for their domination. It is genetics and the belief in a master nation and master race.” War does two things; it helps or it hurts. It honors or it hijacks. Usually however war binds people together if the fight is for right of justice.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays