Preview

Why Nations Go to War

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2476 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Nations Go to War
Why Nations Go To War In John Stoessinger’s work on “Why Nations go to War” he examines ten wars that have occurred since 1914 and the one currently taking place today. These wars include World War One, World War Two, Korean War, Vietnam War, Yugoslavian War, Indo-Pakistani War, Arab-Israel War, Iran-Iraq and Iraq-Kuwait War, War on Terror, and Wars in Rwanda and Darfur. Each of these wars have many things in common, but the one thing that sticks out above many of the other statistics and reasons is that “no nation that began a major war in the twentieth century emerged a winner” (Stoessinger 387). So after reading this quote you begin to ask yourself, why then would a nation choose to start a war and face the difficulties and often tragic outcomes that coincide with war. Stoessinger thesis on why nations go to war: nations go to war out of fear and misconception that leaders have of other nations. The first war that Stoessinger discusses is World War One. When the war was just beginning people did not see the catastrophe that would unfold in the years to come “the emperors and generals who sent their men to war in August 1914thought in terms of weeks, not months, let alone years” (Stoessinger 3). This shows the erroneous belief of many leaders involved in the war. They figured their armies to be far superior and the enemy to be inferior. But that proved not the case. Instead of stepping back and assessing the situation that they were about to put themselves and their nation into, this belief that they would dominate brought “the world catastrophe that would snuff out the lives on an entire generation and consign the next to illusion and despair” (Stoessinger 3). As a leader of a nation makes decisions they should keep in mind the people that they are making these decisions for, they should make decisions that are in the best interest of their people. Wilhelm II made a mistake when he based a decision upon personal feelings,
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Woodrow Wilson Nationalism
    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Woodrow Wilson Nationalism

    When the world starts to fight, most people think to fight back, but that is not always the case. After the assassination of Austro-Hungarian Archduke and heir, Francis Ferdinand, the world was about to go to war. It started out small, but others got involved through alliances and deals. The US entered in 1917, but was that really the best course of action? The curse of nationalism is something that shouldn’t have taken so much control of the nation. Woodrow Wilson tried his best to stay neutral, and the reasons he declared war were not necessarily necessary. Germany was trying convince Mexico to join the war against America, but America didn’t have to worry about Mexico with it’s strength. America never had to enter the war, but because of pride, threats, and fear, America ended up making the wrong decision.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Analysis Of David Barash's Approaches To Peace
    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Analysis Of David Barash's Approaches To Peace

    In David Barash’s book, Approaches to Peace: A Reader in Peace Studies, he encompasses a large range of entries on the topic of war. In his introduction, he writes, “One of my goals in Approaches to Peace has been to bring together material that has a relatively long ‘shelf life’ that transcends the latest crisis or fad.” From his text, the material sheds different perspectives in explaining how the human race can move towards global peace. His first chapters digs into different elements of war. Like many problems, in order to prevent it, one must look at the cause of the problem. Thus, throughout his first chapter, from the viewpoint of war as a global problem, a few different authors contribute articles on the causes of war. As expected,…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Nations Go to War
    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Why Nations Go to War

    This chapter is an analyzation of the beginning of WWI and how Austria's and Serbia's actions led Europe into this state of war. Stoessinger believed that every leader had a distorted view of themselves. They thought greater of themselves and lesser of their enemies than they really were. This was one of the major contributing factors to the war. He says:…

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Alliance Aggression Theory: Why Do Wars Break Out?
    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Alliance Aggression Theory: Why Do Wars Break Out?

    When wars break out, people often do not think of the reasons for why they break out, instead they either strongly support the war or are strongly against the war. The usual source of information to the public is by the use of media. The media never have a constant view or opinion of the war causes, or anything war related as they are either aligned with the far right, or aligned with the far left. With that said, the purpose of this research paper is to investigate and delve into the reasons of what causes war to erupt. Specifically, for this paper, it is going to look at two theoretical reasons as to why North Korea attacked South Korea. In the beginning of the paper, the two theories that will be used to explain why North Korea attacked…

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Military Ethics
    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Military Ethics

    War has always been, and will always be, a necessary action perpetrated by the human race. There are many different reasons for war: rage, passion, greed, defense, and religion to name a few. When differences cannot be solved or compromised through mediation with an opposing party and anger burns with a fiery passion, war is the last remaining option. Obviously, the purpose of any war is to win. How are wars won? Perhaps if we were to ask a member of the Defense Department during the early stages of the war in Iraq, his answer might be, “To win this war we must force the enemy into submission by means of ethical warfare.” If we were to ask a marine in the Second World War what he was told by his commanding officer he would reply, “To close with the enemy and destroy him.” (Fussell, 763).…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Things They Carried
    • 2057 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Things They Carried

    War presents a very complex moral dilemma. While it is necessary to fight for freedom, a better world, and what is right, war contradicts itself. The very same soldiers that fight in defense of these values have them taken away because of their experiences at war. The negative effects are just as big as the positive effects of war. A nation can never really win in war because of this. Instead war just stays a neutral thing.…

    • 2057 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Truman's Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb
    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Truman's Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb

    War is a constant debate of right and wrong. Throughout the ages war had been everlasting battles fought and battles lost. Lives are sacrificed for the cause of men. One of the most well known wars of all time World War II was a constant struggle for world power. On one side of the world the Germans fighting in the east and the Japanese in the west. The end of the war was brought on by new technology and the decision to change the world. People ask if it was necessary to drop the bombs on Japan. Truman made a decision that saved the lives of American Soldiers as well as Japanese soldiers. If it wasn't for the lives saved, the Technology developed and the Decision made the world would not have devolved as fast as it has.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    New American Militarism
    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    New American Militarism

    War has become a game for the United States, an addicting one. Many years ago, war was always seen as a last tragic sult, but when forwarding in time, this is no…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Do Disagreements In History Lead To War
    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Do Disagreements In History Lead To War

    Why do disagreements in history lead to war? The Texans fought so that they could be able to declare themselves an independent republic. The Texans dedication they were able to win significant battles such as the won Alamo in which lead to the Texans become independent. The issue between Mexico and Texas were that they could not find a boundary line. Mexico debated that the border line was somewhere near the Nueces river. And Texas debated that it was at the Rio Grande. Was the United states justified for going to war with Mexico? In my opinion they were. First because Mexico did not take Texas seriously and did not want to let them become an independent republic. Second, because the U.S. depended on this westward expansion, the U.S. was…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psychological Trauma In Vietnam War
    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Psychological Trauma In Vietnam War

    War never ends quietly; while the battlefield tells the most immediate brutal stories, it is the aftermath that shows the greatest tragedy. The Vietnam War is not an exception; it resulted in countless damages, the worst being the psychological trauma suffered by its participants. This therefore becomes a recurring subject explored by many Vietnam War authors, who wrote of an experience they lived first hand. The depiction of psychological trauma in their works heightens the brutality of the war and criticises its tragic futility.…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What makes a war just?
    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What makes a war just?

    There have been many wars fought throughout history. Each of these wars could be found to be either just or unjust. The way to determine this is by a set of guidelines that have been made by historians and philosophers over the years. This set of rules is called the jus ad bellum or right to war. The six guidelines included in this set are as follows: legitimate authority, just cause, right intention, last resort, reasonable chance of success, and an end goal of superior peace. I believe that, according to the jus ad bellum, the declaration of the First Crusade by Pope Urban II was just.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Why War?
    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why War?

    Is war inevitable? It appears that the answer to this question is yes. However, war is unpredictable and must be studied based on individual circumstances, actions taken, and reactions. States disagree with each other on many subjects and conflicts arise often. To answer this question, we must first examine the causes of a conflict, evaluate the outcome and determine any alternatives that may exist. Then we can analyze some alternative theoretical outcomes compared to the actual conclusions. The Peloponnesian War provides an excellent example to be evaluated. The following gives a brief history of the war, causes of the war, and the importance of its study.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Countries Go to War
    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why Countries Go to War

    One of the biggest reasons why countries go to war with one another is because a country needs land. This factor has driven leaders to declare war on other countries with favorable land for hundreds of years. The wars that focused on gaining land for the “host” country were usually the most brutal in terms of deaths and methods of combat. An example of a war that was based on the land gaining factor was the crusades. The crusade wars took place from about 1000 AD to 1300 AD; an incredibly long thirty decades. Wars can turn from a religious purpose to a territorial purpose and the crusades were a good example of this (doc.1). The crusades were holy wars in which Muslims were targeted. Muslims were said to be of a lower type of people than everyone else. The Muslims tried to fight back as groups started to kill Muslims in their own land to take over the area. The crusades were supposed to protect the new holy land founded by the Catholics but turned into a struggle for small regions that would later on be of no use. The outcomes of the wars were different of both sides. Neither side gained much other than the other side’s culture and ways of living. The Catholics found new ways to build windows while the Muslims were full of…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Cause of War: Stoessinger’s Misperception Framework
    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Cause of War: Stoessinger’s Misperception Framework

    Political Violence has been affiliated with governments and nations since the beginning of political history and plays a huge role in the causes of Wars around the world. What causes leaders to declare war? Many philosophers have based their studies and theories on this question; many have different perspectives. One philosopher, John Stoessinger, has expressed his theories on the causes of war through what he calls his “misperception framework.” Stoessinger shows great interests in the personalities of world leaders; he is less impressed with the roles of abstract forces such as nationalism, militarism, economic factors, or alliance systems as the causes of war. He views misperception as the sing most important precipitating factor in the outbreak of war. His framework is based on four parts which describe the environmental and psychological factors that leaders reflect on throughout their campaign. First off a leader’s image of themselves; there is a extraordinary consistency in the self images of most national leaders on the brink of war. Every leader confidently expects a victory after a brief and triumphant campaign were this common belief in a short decisive war is usually the overflow from a reservoir of self-delusions held by the leadership about both itself and the nation. Second a leader’s view of the character their enemy portrays. Distorted views of the adversary’s character will help precipitate a conflict. Third is based on a leader’s view of their adversary’s intentions toward their self. When a leader on the brink of war believes that their adversary will attack shows a high percentage of the start of a conflict. War becomes a virtual certainty when both leaders shore this perception. Lastly when a leader views the adversary’s capabilities and power it is depicted as the most quintessential cause of war. This is not the actual distribution of power that precipitates a…

    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Herodotus: Is War Good Or Bad?
    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Herodotus: Is War Good Or Bad?

    As I read both exports of Thucydides and Herodotus they go back and forth with the question that was given for the assignment, is war good or bad. When I first thought on the topic I was leaning more to the good side, but I re-read my notes and both exports and realized that war is actually bad. Not only for the two nations that are fighting but for all nations, and cities neighboring those two. It's bad because it makes rulers and other high ranks do things that are unpredictable. Both of these historians told us that when it came to war all the rulers wanted the biggest army and to either kill off or enslave the other nation.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics