Preview

india needs leadership

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1882 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
india needs leadership
India needs a strong dictator
Against
India being a strong democratic country doesn’t really need a dictator. It may just lead to disruption.
India is a big country. People live in harmony and are known for their unity. A dictator may not be able to maintain this.
Few people may again misunderstand dictatorship and may think it defies the purpose of freedom.
Dictatorship may bring very short term changes. A country needs a strong government.
Dictatorship may introduce communal differences depending on the community of the dictator.
Human rights can be certainly bypassed.
It may lead to disorganization and malfunctioning of the law and order system of the country.
For
A dictator can easily help us get rid of the dirt in politics.
A very small community of people actually understands the meaning of democracy and don’t make misuse of it.
For over decades, India is trying to get rid of poverty, may be, a dictator can help in this aspect.
A dictator can help the citizens realize the meaning of democracy and freedom.
Whether a country has a dictator or not, freedom of speech and rights is what matters to any citizen. It is a myth that smaller countries usually need dictatorship. We cannot forget the smaller country has the same human species with the same human rights as in other countries.

Discussion board though Dictatorship may banish dirty politics and corruption from india, I think that choosing is a dictator will end the right to speak ability which evrey indian has!! peole may lost democracy.. and ultimately dictatorship will give born to another hitlar or gaddafi or saddam where human right is was snatched. So india will be a heaven of silence.
. India needs strong dictator

India doesn't need a dictator but, it certainly need a strong democratic alliance, which can take some tough decision on the problems which are rising in India. India need a group of people who are not afraid to take some strict actions and go against the law if

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Pro War in Iraq

    • 2057 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The problem, of course, is that many peoples currently living under dictatorships might, if asked right now, come up with some deeply unpleasant policy decisions. They might even vote against democracy, saying they don't want it. This is the worry in many countries with an Islamic fundamentalism problem: if they can get a majority the fundamentalists are committed to democracy under the slogan "one man, one vote, just this once". That is not democracy.…

    • 2057 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In a country that claims democracy, Indians seem to be confused on the definition of the government style. You can not blame the people however, because it is the duty of the people to have faith in their country to do the right thing. Indira Gandhi manipulated the people of India by legitimizing the repression by calling for order in a chaos that she created. Indira Gandhi has made catastrophic changes to India’s political, social, and religious views that still have negative repercussions today because of the authoritarian precedent that she set for India’s political system.…

    • 2992 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is what Gandhiji had achieved after thirty years of undisputed dictatorship and this is what the Congress Party calls ‘Freedom’. Never in the history of the world has such slaughter been officially connived at or the result described as Freedom, and ‘Peaceful Transfer of power’ If what happened in India in 1946, 1947 and 1948 is to be called peaceful one wonders what would be the violent. Hindu Muslim Unity bubble was finally burst and a theocratic and communal State dissociated from everything that smacked of United India was established with the consent of Nehru and his crowd and they have called it `Freedom won by them at sacrifice’. Whose sacrifice?…

    • 2727 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not all countries/cultures are suited to democracy. The reason being is that some cultures are very feisty and in those cultures…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democracy on the other hand is a rule where the needs of the people are considered over the wants of the ruler, and thus it tends to prosper far longer than dictatorship. With freedom of expression, freedom of speech and freedom of lifestyle prevailing, the citizens feel satisfied and contended with the ruler they choose. Since, it’s the people themselves that choose the best ruler; they have no face to complain when the ruler fails to meet their expectations. Alternatively, the liberties the citizens enjoy in democracy give them a platform to voice their complaints, majorly through media. Whereas in dictatorship, citizens are forced to act like puppets, with no right to criticize on the way country is being governed.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dictators have complete power and they are not bound by laws. In most cases, dictators eliminate all of their political opponents, including the existing government, usually by violent means. This means that the people did not give the dictator permission to rule the country. Most often, the dictator will not answer to the people and will instead rule with an iron fist. Idi Amin Dada was one of the worst dictators in the twentieth century. In the seventies, Amin overthrew the existing government and declared himself the new president of Uganda. During his reign, Amin launched genocide of tribes within Uganda, exiled Asians, and violently eliminated anyone who spoke out in protest against his regime. He did all of this despite his promise to Ugandans to give power back to the people. Amin had very loyal followers as well. His charisma compelled everyone to do as he said, and he also used fear. As a result, no one dared to protest what Amin was doing. Dictators may say that they plan to give their people more freedom, but they use this excuse to justify the atrocities and violations of human rights that they…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Democracy matters

    • 659 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Democracy matter in many different ways influence human to chase their freedom and liberty,some countries didn’t have democracy is mean they can’t aspire democracy?No.citizen who want democracy still contend with military forces get their wants.…

    • 659 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the other hand the people that follow this leader may rebel or become irritable towards the leader; this can then cause strikes and maybe even acts of violence. People in general like to have a voice or be heard regarding an issue involving them; once you take that away a negative impact may occur. An autocratic leadership may have a lack of creativity as there is only one person making the decisions.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Which Is Fairer to People

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dictatorship is an extreme management, which means political authority is monopolized by a single person or political entity, and exercised through various oppressive mechanisms. Because dictatorship is power without supervision, it may cause corruption. Dictatorship is sure to harm the interests of the people and does not comply with the human rights requirements; everyone should have the right to choose their own. Therefore, some people will argue that democracy is better than dictatorship. Because people have rights to choose what they want to choose, such as who is the leader of the government. Indeed, democracy is the only ways of that the achievements of development can really share with people and is the best weapon against corruption.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In dictatorship, government got their power from the military, therefore they have a stronger military and have lower crime rate. Moreover, since the government has the power to make decision, it has quicker act on decision-making. Dictatorship government potential to provide for the basic standard of living for everybody, but only China and Cube does a…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the beginnings of the times, from ancient civilizations dated as back as 2000 B.C.E., the world had been based upon political systems and philosophies of governments. A country’s philosophy of government determines the economic system and the amount of rights that people have within that country’s borders. As people can see, in the article written by Severine Deneulin “Democracy and human development”, she explains the complexities of the relationship between democracy and human development, there she made it clear that the practice of democracy is good whether or not the government chose has a positive impact in the society of that country. Another article about countries’ governmental philosophies was written by Gene Sharp, and it is called “From dictatorship to democracy”. Throughout the entire article, Sharp said that it was wrong to compare democracy to communism because communism is an economic system and democracy is a political system, and that’s why he compared democracy and dictatorship. Within the lines of that article, Sharp mentioned that dictators are the result of having a disunited society in those countries, and that people should protest against the dictators to get their rights back as well. Therefore, everyone’s way of living Is affected by their country’s philosophy of government in a direct way.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pest Analysis for India

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages

    First of all, let us focus on the political environment. India had a very long period of the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty, and then became the colony of the British for nearly 100 years. In 1947, India was independent, and became a republic country. Due to British influence, India’s political structure is similar to Britain. India has a parliamentary system and a party system. There are more than eight national and two dozen regional parties in India. Among these parties, the Congress Party is the most influential party in the country. It had uninterrupted control of the government for 33 of the 44 years following independence. The Congress Party played a really importance role in India’s economic reform. For example, the aged P.V. Narasimha Rao led the Congress Party from 1991-1996 and was responsible for much of India’s free market reform in the early to mid-1990s. Comparing with other Asian countries, India’s parliamentary system and party system makes the political environment relatively free and open. At the same time, the influence and authority of the Congress Party also makes India’s political environment relatively stable. However there are also lots of issues impacting India’s stable…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Mahathir’s speech about the Filipino-style democracy, I have to agree with what he had said; “When people think only of the freedoms of democracy and know nothing of the implied responsibilities, democracy will not bring the goodness that it promises. Instead it will result only in instability and instability will not permit development to take place and the people to enjoy the benefits of freedom and the rights that democracy promises”. We should not only look at the benefits we will get but we should be aware also in our duties. Everything should be balance so that we can attain our goals easily. I also agree with his statement that tells about how democracy works. He stated that it only happens when we know its limitations. Of course, not everything is unlimited. We have a number of rights to be name of but we should know its coverage. We should not abuse it rather use it wisely. Some government officials also become more corrupt because of freedom. When we elect him, He can enjoy a lot of benefits without giving too much effort. And because of that, he will do everything just to maintain his position or raise it higher. People should also be disciplined enough. Having democracy means having the freedom to rule yourself but, not all people can do that. Not all of us possess something that a leader should have. They think that when they have freedom, they have everything under their control so they use it abusively. For an instance, some people are rallying because they think that the government does not give concerns with their problems. They voted for them so they should not blame them for not being satisfied. They should know that they are not the only one suffering. The officials in return should be willing to serve his people. They should them first before themselves. However, I disagree that a doctor president is much better for Philippines. He may have those…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But India is not playing any role here at all. I see in Joint comprehensive plan of Action, the JCPA, had Germany and Italy even but no India or even Pakistan despite they are closest to Iran. India good, but for nothing. A white elephant indeed! In the feast of struggle for survival, nobody asking India to play her role boldly! Why? Second largest population, biggest democracy and a rising economic giant with bunch of scholars and great history, why India is ignored yet? Why so? People over there, are wasting time on social media with its newly elected Prime Minister or fighting each other for everything they could fight for. Excluding Modi, the Prime Minister and a few more, other leaders are still corrupt; people are selfish, fearless of laws, debasing legal system of rule by eagerly taking laws in their hands. Law enforcement and common people easily regresses the value of human life & right, public sanctity and common discipline. I don’t know how they see world affaires burning out from their windows. They may worry about cross firings at Pakistani border or infiltration from Bangladesh but they have no sense to say anything beyond this limit. They don’t realize, India could be a close ally with US unlike China who helped Iran in its nuclear program. Such a self-centered but huge country with largest democracy and second largest population on planet, is proving itself worthless on world arena. History will forget this or will not mention its name in any role and this is what most dangerous thing is for its own future. To whom, I can say, ‘keep awake means you’re in own natural timeline otherwise in others dominating time line’. Can any brilliant think tank or politician or even Prime Minister Modi understand…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    goverment need of an hour

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What is the need of good' governance in the Indian context? A nation where according to an estimation by an NGO based in Hyderabad, the expenditure on Governance, by the 790 politicians at the Centre, the 4120 in the 35 States and Union Territories and the 18.7 million employees of the Central and State Governments Use about Rs. 2200 crore day or Rs. 760000 crore per year, both on capital and revenue account. Instead of such a huge expenditure, the gulf of per capita availability of resources…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics