How Did Stanley Milgram Contribute To Psychology
Stanley Milgram was a person who contributed greatly to the world of psychology by conducting an experiment, which was focused on the issue between obedience an authority figure, and the human mind's personal conscience. Stanley Milgram was an American psychologist. He first began conducting these experiments in the 1960's. He attended Yale University for his professorship. He would eventually earn his Ph.D. in social psychology from Harvard University. Soon after, he taught at Yale and Harvard, but then at the City University of New York Graduate Center. He spent most of his career there, while ascertaining his theories on the human conscience when pressured by an authority figure. He is widely recognized as one of perhaps the most important figures
…show more content…
It formed many beliefs on whether or not a decision made by an person was because it was either an actual decision that contained a desired task and result, or simply because it was given by an authority figure. It left many pondering and criticizing how one could continue to follow instructions, even if they were morally wrong and harmful. It helped psychologists realize that actions can effect attitudes, even if the subject may be in a state of cognitive dissonance. People can be pressured and conformed into standards to where the person might not morally agree, but would agree only because they are under pressure. It created a lot of arguments on whether or not someone might make decisions based on morals, but simply to follow an instructional guideline of some sort. It impacted the world of psychology because it allowed psychologists to attempt to delve into the human mind's conscience, and see if there was a way to assume a judgment of character based on someone's role in authority. It is an interesting phenomenon, and still receives a lot of
It formed many beliefs on whether or not a decision made by an person was because it was either an actual decision that contained a desired task and result, or simply because it was given by an authority figure. It left many pondering and criticizing how one could continue to follow instructions, even if they were morally wrong and harmful. It helped psychologists realize that actions can effect attitudes, even if the subject may be in a state of cognitive dissonance. People can be pressured and conformed into standards to where the person might not morally agree, but would agree only because they are under pressure. It created a lot of arguments on whether or not someone might make decisions based on morals, but simply to follow an instructional guideline of some sort. It impacted the world of psychology because it allowed psychologists to attempt to delve into the human mind's conscience, and see if there was a way to assume a judgment of character based on someone's role in authority. It is an interesting phenomenon, and still receives a lot of