How Did Chris Mccandless Live In The Wild
The wilderness is seen as something either beautiful and peaceful or scary and dangerous. Christopher Johnson McCandless was one of those who found peace and beauty in the wilderness. When Chris McCandless went into the wild, he was seeking peace and truth; he was not crazy for looking that in the wilderness, which he may have found before his death, but he wasn’t fully capable of surviving in the wild. Chris McCandless made friends easily, and he had a strong effect on people. For instance, Ron Franz had grown so fond of him that he stated, “so I asked Alex if I could adopt him, if he would be my grandson.” (55). When Franz found out of Chris’s death, he went back to his old drinking habits. Chris found love and support in Franz. Also, “Before McCandless and Westerberg went their separate ways, Westerberg told the young man to look him up in Carthage if he ever needed a job.”(17). After a little bit of time getting to know Chris, Westerberg trusted him and respected his hard work. This defines Chris McCandless as hard working and responsible. Lastly, Gallien also cared for him after a few hours of knowing him; “If you make
…show more content…
Chris had gone to the wild to find what he needed; thruth and peace. “Alex admitted that the only food in his pack was a ten-pound bag of rice…He had no ax, no bug dope, no snow shoes, no compass.”(5). He believed he would’ve been able to find whatever he needed with the limited amount of supplies he had. While finding his truth and new identity in the wilderness, he did it in a manner that eventually killed him. Like Krakauer said, “Unlike McCandless, however, I have in my backpack a 1:63, 360-scale topographic map…Exquisitely detailed, it indicates that half a mile downstream, in the throat of the U.S. Geological Survey.”(173). McCandless would have been capable of finding his identity, truth, and peace in the wild and coming out alive if he would have more
Chris had gone to the wild to find what he needed; thruth and peace. “Alex admitted that the only food in his pack was a ten-pound bag of rice…He had no ax, no bug dope, no snow shoes, no compass.”(5). He believed he would’ve been able to find whatever he needed with the limited amount of supplies he had. While finding his truth and new identity in the wilderness, he did it in a manner that eventually killed him. Like Krakauer said, “Unlike McCandless, however, I have in my backpack a 1:63, 360-scale topographic map…Exquisitely detailed, it indicates that half a mile downstream, in the throat of the U.S. Geological Survey.”(173). McCandless would have been capable of finding his identity, truth, and peace in the wild and coming out alive if he would have more