Preview

Hollingsworth V. Perry

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1258 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hollingsworth V. Perry
Bair 1

Marissa Bair Mr. Turcotte AP US History 6 December 2012 Hollingsworth v. Perry 1. In February of 2004 the mayor of San Francisco, Gavin Newsom and other city officials began distributing marriage licenses to gay and lesbian couples in the city of San Francisco, California. In March of the same year, the County of San Francisco ordered the halt of marriages, pending court review. On March 29th, the San Francisco Superior Court declared San Francisco’s issuing of same-sex marriage licenses illegal. Multiple state Supreme Court hearings were held on the legality of the same-sex marriages in the spring of 2004. San Francisco filed its own lawsuit against the state of California in order to have its case heard. In August, the state Supreme Court ruled the same-sex marriages performed in San Francisco violated authority and state law. The court deemed all same-sex marriages performed to be null. The next year, in March of 2005, Richard Kramer, the trial judge of In re Marriage Cases (2008) reported that California’s ban on same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. They said marriage was a fundamental right that cannot be discriminated against based on sexual orientation. The next month, California legalized same-sex marriage on June 16th, 2008. Less than five months later, the marriages were stopped by the passing of Proposition 8, which provided that “only marriage between a man and a woman is valid in recognized in California.” This overturned the California Supreme Court’s ruling of In re Marriage Case that same-sex couples have the constitutional right to marry. Same-sex marriages in California

Bair 2

have since come to a standstill; which proposes the question of the current case to be ruled on, in the case Hollingsworth v. Perry. From June 16th, 2008, to November 3rd, 2008, the California Constitution held the right that lesbian and gay couples have all of the rights and benefits that opposite-sex couples enjoy. Did California violate the Equal



Cited: "The Constitution of the United States of America: Amendments 11-27." Archives.org. N.p., n.d. Web. Garrison, Jessica. "Supreme Court Keeps California in Suspense on Gay Marriage."Latimes.com. Los Angeles Times, 3 Dec. 2012. Web. 4 Dec. 2012. "Lawrence v. Texas." Casebriefs.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 04 Dec. 2012. "Proposition 8 Decision." Hrc.org. Human Rights Campaign, 26 May 2009. Web. 4 Dec. 2012. "Romer v. Evans." Casebriefs.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 04 Dec. 2012.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Branzburg v. Hayes was the only ever supreme court case to deal with reporter’s privilege. The ruling of this case was that reporter’s had no right to hide their sources in a court case. The chief justice at the time,Warren Burger, made a point that reporters, “like other citizens, [must] respond to relevant questions put to them in the course of a valid grand jury investigation or criminal trial (Fargo,2010).” With a decision that was five for and four against, this case was not an open and shut many thought it to be. Calling into play a look at the first amendment and what it really means when it says the freedom of speech. Interpreting a document that is more than two hundred years old is not an easy task to accomplish, having to combine…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: Groups of the same sex couples sued their relevant state agencies in Ohio, Kentucky, Michigan, and Tennessee to challenge the constitutionality of those states bans on the same sex marriage or refusal to recognize legal same sex marriages that occurred in jurisdiction that provide for such marriages. James Obergefell (plaintiffs) in each case argued that the states statutes violated Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the fourteenth Amendment, and one group of plaintiffs also brought claims under the Civil Rights act. In all the cases, the trial court found in favor of the plaintiffs. The U.S Courts of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reverse and held that the states bans on same sex marriage and refusal to recognize marriages performed in other states did not violated the couples fourteenth amendment rights to equal protection and due process.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wyoming V. Shatzer

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    FACTS: After a routine traffic stop, a police officer noticed a hypodermic syringe in the shirt pocket of the car’s driver, which the driver soon admitted was for using drugs. The officer searched the passenger compartment for contraband and came upon a purse, which the respondent, a passenger in the car, claimed was hers. There was drug paraphernalia inside, and the respondent was arrested on drug charges. The evidence was admitted at trial and respondent was convicted. The Wyoming Supreme Court then reversed, holding that an officer with probable cause to search a vehicle may search all containers that might conceal the object of the search, but if the officer knows or should know that the container belongs to a passenger who is not suspected of criminal activity, then the container is not allowed to be searched under the Fourth Amendment unless someone had the opportunity to conceal contraband. The State of Wyoming was then granted certiorari.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the case of Garden State Equality vs. Dow unravels into the Supreme Court hearings, there will be an indefinite variety of opinions and disputes of minds. There is room for controversy and disputes will arise. There are miss-interpretations and quotes that government officials and citizens against civil union rights have expressed and demonstrated about same-sex couples and their right to marry. This is an example of an interpretation given to describe differences in marital relationships by one of the Opinions of the Justices to the Senate, 440 Mass. at 1207, it states, “The dissimilitude between the terms “civil marriage” and “civil union” is not innocuous; it is a considered choice of…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ISSUE: State statues definition of “marriage” -limiting it to man & woman. Unconstitutional as it bars equal protection…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Costello, G.A., Killian, J.H., & Thomas, K.R. (Ed.). (2002). The Constitution of the united states…

    • 1547 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prop 8

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The planitffs argue that prop 8 violates the equal protection clause of the fourteenth. Proponents argue that heterosexual marriage was an "essiantial institution of society." Both parties did not dispute that the right to marry is fundamental the only difference between the two parties is who is "allowed" to get married and who is not. According to the District Court Ruling on prop 8, California is said to encourage sexual activity to happen within a marriage, basiacally a marriage license to participate in sexual intercourse. California allows almost partnership , but therwith that. Domestic partnerships are distinct from marriages and do not provide the same social meaning as a marriage does. all same sex couples only one option and that is domestic e is one problem…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2000 the possibility of other states legalizing same sex marriage led to Prop 22 being passed, which restricted California from acknowledging the marriages of same sex couples from other states. The California Supreme Court overturned Prop 22 in May of 2008, and the court also mandated marriage licenses to be issued by judicial degree, and not by the will of the voters or the legislature. These licenses were not recognized by the federal government and most of the nation, but for that brief period in California same sex marriage was legal. The same sex couples that were married during that time are still considered married in California under the grandfather…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Same sex marriage was not officially recognized by the United States until 2013, when the Supreme Court ruled that only legally recognizing marriage between a man and a woman was unconstitutional. However, five years earlier, in 2008, California made same-sex marriage legal within its geographic borders (Wikipedia).The California legalization of same-sex marriage today is very similar to its progressive history of adopting controversial legislation before the same legislation is adopted nation-wide.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case guaranteed that people have the right to choose what sex they want to marry. Gay marriage was now not only recognized by certain states, but by the whole country. Same-sex couples could now have the same rights as other wed couples as they received equal recognition. States compiled to a ruling of the national government. It was not an issue for states to decide, as people’s rights are to be protected throughout the…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Race and Your Community

    • 2086 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Associated Press (2006, May, 16.) Judge: Georgia Gay Marriage Ban Violates State Constitution Retrieved from http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,195756,00.html…

    • 2086 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two cases before the United States Supreme Court challenge both Congress’s traditional definition of marriage in DOMA and California’s traditional definition in its Proposition 8. The central question before the court in each…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Adocates throughout the world came together with one voice to fight for marital rights for same sex couples. According to an article in the Huffington Post, Liebelson and Terkel, reports that the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that it is legal for all Americans, no matter their gender or sexual orienation, to marry the people they love. The decision is a historic victory of gay rights activitsts who have fought for years in the lower courts. Thirty-seven states and the District of Columbia already recognize marriage equality. The remaining 13 states ban these unions, even as public support have reached record levels nationwide. The justices found that, under the 4th Amendment, states must issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples and recognize same-sex unions that have been legally performed in other states. Justice Anthony Kennedy delivered the majority opinion and was joined by Justices Ruth BaderGinsburg, Elena Kagan, Stephen Breyer and Sonai Sotomayor. In a rare move, the four dissenting justices each wrote an opinion (Dana Liebelson and Amanda Terkel,…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Same sex marriage has been a debatable issue in the United States for many decades now, but just in 1993, Baehr v. Miike, a legal case of three same-sex couples decided by The Supreme Court of Hawaii, alarmed the nation when ruled that a ban on same sex marriage constituted discrimination based on sex. During that time, no one state allowed same-sex marriage but all of them recognized marriages from each other. Thus, if back then with Baehr v. Miike case, Hawaii had recognized same sex marriage, other states would have had recognized it too. It was then, as an immediate response to the Hawaiian case, the creation of The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), an Act that was passed by the federal government in 1996…

    • 2406 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay Rights Debate

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Following the 5-4 ruling, American support was on the rise with roughly two-thirds of American’s being in favor of same-sex marriage. Until the ruling many gay rights activists and support groups witnessed gay marriage bans fall, as 37 states allowed gay marriage. The two biggest questions that were brought in front of the Court that was relevant to the case were, whether states had the right to ban same-sex marriage and if states recognized marriages that were performed out of their respected…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays