Preview

Hey This Is Not Me

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
11803 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hey This Is Not Me
Coherentist Theories of Epistemic Justification
First published Tue Nov 11, 2003; substantive revision Thu Nov 15, 2012
According to the coherence theory of justification, also known as coherentism, a belief or set of beliefs is justified, or justifiably held, just in case the belief coheres with a set of beliefs, the set forms a coherent system or some variation on these themes. The coherence theory of justification should be distinguished from the coherence theory of truth. The former is a theory of what it means for a belief or a set of beliefs to be justified, or for a subject to be justified in holding the belief or set of beliefs. The latter is a theory of what it means for a belief or proposition to be true. Modern coherence theorists, in contrast to some earlier writers in the British idealist tradition, typically subscribe to a coherence theory of justification without advocating a coherence theory of truth. Rather, they either favor a correspondence theory of truth or take the notion of truth for granted, at least for the purposes of their epistemological investigations. This does not prevent many authors from claiming that coherence justification is an indication or “criterion” of truth.

1. Coherentism Versus Foundationalism
2. The Regress Problem
3. Traditional Accounts of Coherence
4. Other Accounts of Coherence
5. Justification by Coherence from Scratch
6. Probabilistic Measures of Coherence
7. Truth Conduciveness: the Analysis Debate
8. Impossibility Results
9. Conclusions
Bibliography
Academic Tools
Other Internet Resources
Related Entries
1. Coherentism Versus Foundationalism

A central problem in epistemology is when we are justified in holding a proposition to be true. This is a problem because it is not at all evident how epistemic justification should be understood, and classical accounts of that notion have turned out to be severely problematic. Descartes thought that a person is justified in holding something to be true



Bibliography: Akiba, K., 2000, “Shogenji 's Probabilistic Measure of Coherence is Incoherent,” Analysis, 60: 356–359. Angere, S., 2007, “The Defeasible Nature of Coherentist Justification,” Synthese, 157 (3): 321–335. Angere, S., 2008, “Coherence as a Heuristic,” Mind, 117 (465): 1–26. Bender, J. W., 1989, “Introduction,” in The Current State of the Coherence Theory: Critical Essays on the Epistemic Theories of Keith Lehrer and Laurence BonJour, with Replies, J. W. Bender (ed.), Dordrecht: Springer. Blanshard, B., 1939, The Nature of Thought, London: Allen & Unwin. BonJour, L., 1985, The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. BonJour, L., 1989, “Replies and Clarifications,” in The Current State of the Coherence Theory: Critical Essays on the Epistemic Theories of Keith Lehrer and Laurence BonJour, with Replies, J. W. Bender (ed.), Dordrecht: Kluwer. Bovens, L, and Hartmann, S., 2003, Bayesian Epistemology, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Bovens, L. and Olsson, E. J., 2000, “Coherentism, Reliability and Bayesian Networks,” Mind, 109: 685–719. Bovens, L. and Olsson, E. J., 2002, “Believing More, Risking Less: On Coherence, Truth and Non-trivial Extensions,” Erkenntnis, 57: 137–150. Cleve, J. V., 2011, Can Coherence Generate Warrant Ex Nihilo? Probability and the Logic of Concurring Witnesses, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 82 (2): 337–380. Cross, C. B., 1999, “Coherence and Truth Conducive Justification,” Analysis, 59: 186–93. Davidson, D., 1986, “A Coherence Theory of Knowledge and Truth,” in Truth and Interpretation, E. LePore (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 307–319. Dietrich, F., and Moretti, L., 2005, “On Coherent Sets and the Transmission of Confirmation,” Philosophy of Science, 72 (3): 403–424. Douven, I., and Meijs, W., 2007, “Measuring Coherence”, Synthese 156 (3): 405–425. Ewing, A. C., 1934, Idealism: A Critical Survey, London: Methuen. Fitelson, B., 2003, “A Probabilistic Measure of Coherence,” Analysis, 63: 194–199. lass, D. H., 2007, “Coherence Measures and Inference to the Best Explanation,” Synthese, 157 (3): 257–296. Huemer, M., 1997, “Probability and Coherence Justification,” Southern Journal of Philosophy, 35: 463–472. Huemer, M., 2007, “Weak Bayesian Coherentism,” Synthese, 157 (3): 337–346. Huemer, M., 2011, “Does Probability Theory Refute Coherentism?”, Journal of Philosophy, 108 (1): 35–54. Kemeny, J. and Oppenheim, 1952, “Degrees of Factual Support, Philosophy of Science, 19: 307–24. Klein, P., and Warfield, T. A., 1994, “What Price Coherence?,” Analysis, 54: 129–132. Klein, P., and Warfield, T. A., 1996, “No Help for the Coherentist”, Analysis, 56: 118–121. Lehrer, K., 1990, Theory of Knowledge, first edition, Boulder: Westview Press. Lehrer, K., 1997, “Justification, Coherence and Knowledge,” Erkenntnis, 50: 243–257. Lehrer, K., 2000, Theory of Knowledge, second edition, Boulder: Westview Press. Lehrer, K., 2003, “Coherence, Circularity and Consistency: Lehrer Replies,” in The Epistemology of Keith Lehrer, E. J. Olsson (ed.), Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 309–356. Lewis, C. I., 1946, An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation, LaSalle: Open Court. Lycan, W. G., 1988, Judgment and Justification, New York: Cambridge University Press. Lycan, W. G., 2012, “Explanationist Rebuttals (Coherentism Defended Again),” The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 50 (1): 5–20. Moretti, L., 2007, “Ways in which Coherence is Confirmation Conducive,” Synthese, 157 (3): 309–319. Neurath, O., 1983/1932, “Protocol Sentences,” in Philosophical Papers 1913–1946, R.S. Cohen and M. Neurath (eds.), Dordrecht: Reidel. Olsson, E. J., 1999, “Cohering with,” Erkenntnis, 50: 273–291. Olsson, E. J., 2001, “Why Coherence is not Truth-Conducive,” Analysis, 61: 236-241. Olsson, E. J., 2002, “What is the Problem of Coherence and Truth?,” The Journal of Philosophy, 99: 246–272. Olsson, E. J., 2005, Against Coherence: Truth, Probability, and Justification, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Olsson, E. J., and Schubert, S., 2007, “Reliability Conducive Measures of Coherence,” Synthese, 157 (3): 297–308. Quine, W. and Ullian, J., 1970, The Web of Belief, New York: Random House. Rescher, N., 1973, The Coherence Theory of Truth, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Rescher, N., 1979, Cognitive Systematization, Oxford: Blackwell. Roche, W., 2010, “Coherentism, Truth, and Witness Agreement”, Acta Analytica, 25 (2): 243–257. Schubert, S., 2012a, “Coherence Reasoning and Reliability: A Defense of the Shogenji Measure”, Synthese, 187(2): 305–319. Schubert, S., 2012b, “Is Coherence Conducive to Reliability?”, Synthese, 187(2): 607–621. Schubert, S., 2011, “Coherence and Reliability: The Case of Overlapping Testimonies,” Erkenntnis, 74, 263–275. Schupbach, J. N., 2008, “On the Alleged Impossibility of Bayesian Coherentism”, Philosophical Studies, 141 (3): 323–331. Schupbach, J. N., 2011, “New Hope for Shogenji 's Coherence Measure”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 62 (1): 125–142. Shogenji, T., 1999, “Is Coherence Truth-conducive?,” Analysis, 59: 338–345. Siebel, M., 2004, “On Fitelson 's Measure of Coherence,” Analysis, 64: 189–190. Sosa, E., 1980, “The Raft and the Pyramid: Coherence Versus Foundations in the Theory of Knowledge,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 5(1): 3–26. Thagard, P., 2000, Coherence in Thought and Action, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. Thagard, P., 2005, “Testimony, Credibility, and Explanatory Coherence,” Erkenntnis, 63 (3): 295–316.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    With this lesson, we begin a new unit on epistemology, which is the philosophical study of knowledge claims. In this first lesson on epistemology, Dew and Foreman discuss some of the basic issues raised in the study of epistemology and then discuss the nature of knowledge itself. They consider questions such as, “What do we mean when we say we know something?” “What exactly is knowledge?…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bibliography: 1. Chisholm, Roderick (1973). “The Problem of the Criterion.” In Philosophical inquiry, Adler and Elgin (eds). Indianapolis: Hackett 77-85.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bonjour's Foundationalism

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages

    BonJour argues that an occurrent belief is a conscious state on its own and it is an intrinsic and constitutive awareness. For an ultimate source of justification, he argues that an apperceptive meta-belief about an occurrent belief has epistemic status required by foundationalism: it can be justified because it is an internally accessible reason for thinking that it is true without that reason depending on any other beliefs. In parallel to the first point, he also argues that a constitutive awareness of sensory content can justify foundational beliefs. BonJour draws an objection to what was presented by philosopher Davidson who proposed the idea that the distinctive content of a sensory experience is non-propositional and non-conceptual in character. According to Davidson, "there is no intelligible relation of justification…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rescher, Nicholas. “Epistemology: an introduction to the theory of knowledge.” State University of New York . 2003 Ebrary.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Sibley, W.M. (1953) “The Rational Versus the Reasonable”, The Philosophical Review, Vol. 62, No. 4 (Oct., 1953), pp.554-560, Philosophical Review, Duke University Press.…

    • 3201 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Imperfect Identity Essay

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cited: Jacobsen, Rockney and Moore, Dwayne. An Introduction to Theories of Knowledge and Reality Redings and Discussions. Canada: Pearson, 2012. Print.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Titchener, E. B. (1898). The postulates of a structural psychology. The Philosophical Review, 7(5), 449–465.…

    • 588 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Spinoza vs Descartes on God

    • 3697 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Frege, Gotlobb. "Sense and Reference."The Philosophical Review 57.3 (1948): 209-230. JSTOR. Web. 1 Oct. 2012. <http://www.jstor.org/>.…

    • 3697 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Augustine and Skepticism

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages

    References: Moore, B. N., & Bruder, K. (2011) Philosophy: The Power of Ideas. (8th ed).…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Moore, B. N., & Bruder, K. (2011) Philosophy: The power of ideas. (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Quinton Anthony, i. T. (1995). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press (p. 666).…

    • 3207 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates as Eros

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Truly, love takes on many different forms. Love, for many centuries, has been given many different names. It also serves different functions. To distinguish a specific type of love, one of them is called eros. How love as eros can be defined is based upon the utilization of a specific writer’s perspective. Numerous published written works may account for the definition of eros. In this Essay, Plato’s perception of love as eros will be described. Furthermore, how and why Socrates, of “The Apology” by Plato, embodies Plato’s definition of eros will be shown. This embodiment will be based off Plato’s eros as poor being, eros as an intermediary between God and men, and eros as resemblance of the “god of Plenty”, eros’ father (Needleman 15 – 17).…

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stevenson, Jay. “The Complete Idiots Guide to Philosophy.” The Golden Mean. Ed. Drew Patty. 2nd Edition. 2002. Pg 67.…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dystopian Poems

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages

    (To JS/07 M 378
This Marble Monument
Is Erected by the State)He was found by the Bureau of Statistics to beOne against whom there was no official complaint,And all the reports on his conduct agreeThat, in the modern sense of an old-fashioned word, he was a saint,For in everything he did he served the Greater Community.Except for the War till the day he retiredHe worked in a factory and never got fired,But satisfied his employers, Fudge Motors Inc.Yet he wasn't a scab or odd in his views,For his Union reports that he paid his dues,(Our report on his Union shows it was sound)And our Social Psychology workers foundThat he was popular with his mates and liked a drink.The Press are…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    What is Truth

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages

    For thousands of years the pursuit of knowledge and the definition of fact plagued philosophers. In order to define what knowledge truly is, fact must be defined as well. If something is a fact, then that must mean that it is truth. Facts and knowledge coexist with truth due to facts being true and incorrect statements being false. Ergo, knowledge can be seen as truth. Then the counterpart of truth; error is one of the main problems of the knowledge of truth (The Problems of Philosophy, 12). However a question that is frequently pondered is “What is truth really?” In order to answer this obscure question philosophers have fabricated many theories. The most famous of these theories are the correspondence and coherence theory. Other theories of truth use said theories as a foundation that later branch off into different directions (Encyclopaedia Britannica). I will examine the strengths and weaknesses of both correspondence and coherence theory while finally using the flaws and benefits of both theories to state my position on how truth is strictly subjective.…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics