Preview

John Locke: Did the Fallen Tree Make a Sound?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
718 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
John Locke: Did the Fallen Tree Make a Sound?
Did The Fallen Tree Make A Sound It is the time and time again old saying does the tree falling in the woods make any sound if no one is around to hear it hit the ground. This question has plagued mankind for an undetermined amount of years many even centuries. No one is for sure of the questions origin however the question itself is the important factor not the origin. There has been many debates over the issue. I choose to use simple logic and reasoning close to the same as John Locke would of thought and try to make a reasonable agreement. John Locke was known as an empiricists epistemologists whose essay has puzzled many minds and made many observations into the human knowledge. Even though many consider John Locke a failure there are a ton more who consider him a brilliant mind. “Though the qualities that affect our senses are, in the things themselves, so united and blended, that there is no separation, no distance between them: yet it is plain, the ideas they produce in the mind enter by the senses simple and unmixed.” (An Essay Concerning Human Understanding pg 86) there is no doubt that if the mind thinks the tree makes a sound then it does according to Locke. Yet the argument is to be made that any mind can make a rash thought of ideas that no longer are plausiable. Sometimes the mind needs something as simple as the tree fallen sounding to reset itself and to be reassured. Locke later states that simple ideas only enter the mind through two ways which are sensation and reflection An Essay Concerning Human Understandin pg 88). For most people the answer to the question is simple, a tree will always make a sound when it falls, their reasoning behind this is the tree makes a sound when someone is around to hear it so why will it not make a sound when no one is around to hear it. The senses have always played tricks on the human race. The sound will always remain to be true due to the fact that the mind thinks that it will, so why doubt the mind.


References: 1. Encyclopedia or similar comprehensive works: Kemerling, Garth, “John Locke: The Origin of Ideas.” Philosophy Pages. Britannica Internet.2001. Web. 1 Mar. 2009 http://www.philosophypages.com/hy/4l.htm 2. Secondary: Rescher, Nicholas. “Epistemology: an introduction to the theory of knowledge.” State University of New York . 2003 Ebrary. http://apus.aquabrowser.com//?itemid=%7clibrary%2fm%2fapus%7cocm56408585 3. Primary source: Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Kitchener, Ont.:Batoche, 2001 Ebrary. 2005.4 Oct. 2010 http://site.ebrary.com.ezproxy1.apus.edu/lib/apus/Doc?id=2001993 4. Journal: http://www.iep.utm.edu/

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Chapters 6 And 7 Module 2

    • 1747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Locke believed that all of our ideas come from experience. He notes that our minds begin as a blank…

    • 1747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Locke believed that knowledge was only gained through worldliness. He told people that experiences caused them to learn. One famous this he argued is that, “at birth the mind is a tabula rasa”3. Tabula rasa translates to “clean slate”. Essentially, everyone is born without knowledge and over time they become wiser and smarter. This was revolutionary because previously no one had every stopped to think about how knowledge was gained other than schooling. Locke was the first to think that people were born without any knowledge. He emphasized the five senses as well. Humans fill their clean slate with ideas and experience in the world through their five senses. There are many varying definitions of knowledge, but John Locke is the most accurate. Locke defines knowledge as “the connection and agreement, or disagreement and repugnancy, of the ideas humans form”4. Since our knowledge is derived from our experiences, it means our knowledge is limited. Not everyone can know everything since not one single person can experience everything this earth has to offer in one lifetime. This also means that everyone’s knowledge varies and no two people have the same exact knowledge since everyone’s experiences are different. Locke also notes that there is a great deal of unknown on this world and there always will be. This observation still is true today because there is a great deal of uncertainty in today’s society. He is also still influential because he taught us to question those uncertain areas. As a continuation, he agrees that there are certain things that we are certain of. One example that Locke uses is the certainty of our own existence and the existence of God even tough we may not fully comprehend who or what he was5. Another very complex theory that he had relating to the idea of knowledge was our ideas are related to reality. He said that, “our ideas…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Final Paper PHL Kloke

    • 1583 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Lowe, E. (2013). The Routledge guidebook to Locke 's Essay concerning human understanding. New York: Routledge.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Locke and Hume argue that all concepts are derived from sense experience, from impressions of sensation or reflection.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an effort to establish boundaries for the use of faith in argument, Locke offers descriptions of faith and reason as well as their proper usage. Although Locke believes both can be used to acquire knowledge it’s no secret that he places a strong preference on reason. So much so, that Locke regards all knowledge gained through faith alone as unreliable unless validated by reason.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Granting that if general truths about logic were innately know by all human beings, then they must also be universally accepted, Locke emphatically denied the consequent. If the innatists were correct, then children and idiots would be the most pure and reliable guides to logical truth, but they are not. Of course the innatist reply to such counter-examples is to suppose that assent to innately inscribed principles is delayed until each individual is able to employ the faculty of reasoning. But why should this be? Either reason is necessary for the discovery of such principles, in which case they are not innately known, Locke argued, or else reason and logic are merely coincidental features of human development, in which case both seem frivolous. Surely, in fact, the use of reason is properly concerned with our assent to general truths.…

    • 520 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comparison Essay

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages

    References: Moore, B. N., & Bruder, K. (2011) Philosophy: The Power Of Ideas. (8th ed.). New York, NY:…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes vs Locke

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Similarly, Locke was also sure of existence. He believed that every object was made up of primary qualities as well as secondary qualities (Paquette 212). Secondary qualities rely on how a person senses the object…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke and David Hume, both great empiricist philosophers who radically changed the way people view ideas and how they come about. Although similar in their beliefs, the two have some quite key differences in the way they view empiricism. Locke believed in causality, and used the example of the mental observation of thinking to raise your arm, and then your arm raising, whereas Hume believed that causality is not something that can be known, as a direct experience of cause, cannot be sensed. Locke believed that all knowledge is derived from our senses, which produce impressions on the mind which turn to ideas, whereas Hume's believed that all knowledge is derived from experiences, and that any experience is of one's own perception. Thus not allowing us to be completely certain of anything. Locke also believed that ideas could be created beyond sense perception, through multiple simple sensations, such as the idea of god, whereas Humes believed that without a direct experience no such idea is valid. Although Locke and Hume share a basic belief of empiricism, Hume's view on ideas and the ability to be certain of anything in reality, is restrained to the confines of experiences being perceived differently, or not at all.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Locke 's Essay Concerning Human Understanding, published in 1689/90 laid the foundations for Rationalism, a typical characteristic of the age of Enlightenment in Europe and in America. In this essay Locke called for the human mind as the decisive means of judging the truth content of a notion, even in a religious context However, his intent was not to argue against the Bible as the word of God, or the theoretical possibility of direct revelations by a deity, he rather insisted that every statement be recognized by the rational mind as true through irrefutable evidence , or, in case someone pleaded that…

    • 4388 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke was best known as an advocate of empiricism and for his belief of tabula rasa, or the blank slate. In this way his beliefs were similar to those of the behaviorist school of thought. Locke is known as the father of English Empiricism. Empiricism believes that everyone is born with a blank slate that we fill as we experience life. The knowledge that we gain throughout life is due to our experiences, not through reasoning or thought. Locke believed that there is only the capacity to have ideas in the mind, not to be born with them. He states that all knowledge of the world comes from the experience we have within it, through our perceptions and senses. According the empiricism, every thought that we have is influenced by an experience that we have had. Essentially, according to Locke’s view and empiricism, the only way to know the truth about something is to actually experience it through our senses.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the 18th century, Locke came up with the term empiricism. Empiricism is the view that most knowledge is derived from experience, which means from both senses and inner thoughts. Empiricism is based on high probability, since it is based in the past. Empiricists refuse the idea that reason produces any knowledge about the world itself. Moreover, they strongly deny the existence of any innate knowledge - knowledge that exists in the mind prior to experience or rational activity. For example, ideas that one is born with.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comparison Essay

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. Moore, B. N., & Bruder, K. (2011) Philosophy: The Power Of Ideas. (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Innate Knowledge

    • 625 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Another great philosopher, named John Locke, had a different view on innate knowledge. He believed that there was no such thing. Locke had a theory called "Tabula Rasa."� This theory states that when we are born, our minds are like a blank sheet of paper. We know nothing and learn everything through experience. As we learn, we gradually fill the sheet of paper with knowledge.…

    • 625 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Elements of Philosophy

    • 2043 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Fox, C. (1999). Foundation: A Manual for the Beginning student of Epistemology. Maryland: University Press of America, Inc.…

    • 2043 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays