Preview

Garrett Hardin S Tragedy Of The Commons

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
653 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Garrett Hardin S Tragedy Of The Commons
Garrett Hardin’s Tragedy of the Commons

2) The Tragedy of the Commons is an economics theory by Garrett Hardin, which he believes that the depletion of a shared resource by individuals, acting independently and rationally according to each person’s self-interest, will affect the group’s long-term interests by depleting what is known as the common resource. This article has evoked a lot of strong emotions in myself mostly fear due to what basically Hardin is telling us is the past affects the future. In my opinion, and I believe Hardin would agree with me we are quickly over-populating the earth “our commons” therefore, making our common resources such as fossil fuels, land and water limited, eventually getting to the point were there is none or a very short supply of these common resources. This instills fear because we need those resources in order to survive and keep “our commons” running in the way in which in needs to in order for us to survive.

3) Short Section A: Page number: 1 Column number: 3 Paragraph begins with: However, given an infinite source of energy, population growth still produces an inescapable problem. Discussion: After reading this paragraph in Hardin’s article, I began to have the feeling of fear. From reading this paragraph, I believe Hardin is trying to say that population growth will produce and currently does produce a problem of our shared energy sources such as food, water and natural fossil fuels and if we continue to overpopulate eventually
We’ll find ourselves in an inescapable problem, because we will have ran out of those energy sources or they will become very limited and maybe restricted.

Short Section B: Page number: 1 Column number: 2 Paragraph begins with: A finite world can support only a finite population; therefore, population growth must eventually equal zero. Discussion: This is another fearful statement by, Hardin because here I believe Hardin is talking about Darwin’s, “survival of the fittest.” That eventually

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    We rely on so many resources to help us advance as we continue into the future, but we are relying on them too much and it’s threatening out world. Try to imagine yourself and your life without resources, no oil, plastic, wood, etc., what could you survive without? Reading the articles, “The Curse of Water Bottles” and “Fracking Threatens Everyone” we see just which resources aren’t completely necessary. Certain resources had a period where they were the rise of mankind, but to this day they are the cause of the falling of mankind.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Garrett Hardin, a human ecologist, wrote an analytical essay, Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor (1974), asserts that sharing resources with the poor will be detrimental to Earth’s limited resources along with its environments. Hardin supports his assertion by describing the negative effects of sharing the resources with the poor, using the idea of overpopulation and “tragedy of the commons”, stating that if foreign countries keeps aiding the poor, as population continue to grow along with their necessities, it will demolish the environment and deplete Earth’s natural resources. His purpose is to persuade his readers that the poor would not learn to survive on their own if they continue to rely on foreign aid. In this analytical…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    SCI 256 Week 1 DQs

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages

    DQ 4: What is zero population growth? Is this a reasonable and attainable goal for the global human population?…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    One particular piece of assumptive data that jumped out of me was Hardin’s prediction that India’s population would increase from what it was in his time, “600 million”, to “1.2 billion in a mere 28 years.” Today, 37 years later, India’s population is estimated around that number. This gave me pause because, while it didn’t increase quite as fast Hardin claimed, it was close enough that it proves the population numbers he was working with and the predictions he made were fairly accurate. I do not know the extent to which Hardin was right, and how much we should trust his solution to overpopulation, but I do know based on this evidence along with the clarity of his logic and the completeness of his argument that it certainly should not be dismissed without giving what it proposes careful consideration. The reaction of my class, then, in rejecting it immediately was ill advised, and if that is at all an indicator of the habits of people in general, it can be a very dangerous thing; what Hardin claims will be a result of ignoring his advice is the suffering of our posterity and, eventually, the demise of our race and ruin of our environment. As a concerned member of an overly sensitive society, I want to urge with this essay that we consider all proposal given from every source with any sort of…

    • 2561 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The tragedy of commons is when people share a common resource they tend to deplete is because of self-interest and for a short term profit.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Garrett Hardin’s essay, Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor, Hardin describes the wealthy population of the world as being in a single lifeboat that is almost filled until buckling while the poor population of the world treads water below. Hardin’s essay gets his readers to feel the natural instinct to survive. The lifeboat metaphor that Hardin uses relieves the wealthy population of their moral obligations to the less fortunate, but in addition, puts all of the blame and cause of the depletion of earth’s resources on the poor. As much as his argument may make sense, there are some flaws in his way of thinking. Alan Durning, who noticed that major flaws with Hardin’s essay, wrote on what he thought about the topic that Hardin has brought to his attention. In Durning’s essay, Asking How Much Is Enough, he argues that it is not overpopulation that is depleting the earth’s resources, but overconsumption of the resources by the wealthy population. The arguments in Durning’s essay makes the reader realize that the way Hardin uses the metaphorical lifeboat to persuade his readers into thinking the same thing as he does and shows that Hardin wrongly places the blame of all of earth’s financial stability problems on the poorer population.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The movies we’ve watched and the articles we’ve read, have given an insight as what may happen, and what is already happening to the world. The movie “Wall-E” has shown the possibilities of world destruction, while the movie “A Civil Action” shows the kind of destruction that is occurring now, and the cost that is associated with both scenarios. To coincide with these two movies, the articles “The Tragedy of the Commons” and “The Problem of Social Cost”, also tell us what to expect if the human race does not change its ways.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, the earth’s population is growing at a fast rate that we cannot handle. Overpopulation plus overuse of resources equals a funeral for the earth in the very near future. By the time we get to “2050, human beings could devour an estimated 140 billion tons of minerals, ores, fossil fuels and biomass per year – three times the current consumption…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Hardin's " Tragedy of the Commons," and Diamonds, "The World as Polder: What Does it Mean to Us Today?," One can see how Hardin's main points relate to Diamonds, because both dissect the unsustainable aspects of our society. Both authors use different methods to get their point across, however their main points are very similar. Although Diamond closely looks at past societal collapses, and what aspects of their society caused their collapses, Hardin's current view of the modern worlds unsustainable population, has many characteristic to the older society's that Diamond discusses in his essay. For example Hardin look at our increasing population and how we are over indulging in our resources, that will soon run out if we're not careful. While on the other hand, Diamond describes how over population was a major reason for the Easter Islanders collapse.…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Beetle Research Paper

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hypothesis 1: The amount of food is a limiting resource for the population of the…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article “The End of the Wild” by Wade Davis is an article any environmentally conscious person, a person who wishes to spread awareness of the damaging effects of society’s overconsumption on the environment, should read. The Canadian born Davis holds a degree from Harvard University in Ethnobotony, a degree that examines the relationship between humans and plants. The last sentence of his third paragraph quite clearly explains his thesis; transgressions toward the environment because of human ignorance and/or greed can only be accepted and excused by society for so long, the destruction of our ecosystem is inevitable unless drastic changes are made. After reading Davis’s article I fully agree with the argument he…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a time where people wonder what the world is going to come to. Is there going to be a time where we run out of resources, or will we run out of room and become over populated? It is natural to wonder these types of questions. So we as humans need to come up with a solution on how we can maintain what we have now before it is gone and we have no future to look forward to. By doing this we can ensure that our children and our children’s children.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ultimate Resource theory it focuses on adaptation when it comes to resources. The theory holds that the Ultimate resource is not a physical object but rather a theory of the capacity for humans to invent and adapt. What Julian Simon it’s trying to explain is that we humans have the capacity to adapt and create. For example back in time the primary source of energy was carbon. The trains moved with that, and many other things. When the demand for carbon rose, the resource started becoming scarce. This make the resource become expensive and started affecting the population in a social, economic and in a mental way. When this happens, the problem leads us to a solution or in other words an incentive on people to create a new resource. So now tell me what’s behind every problem, behind every problem there is a solution. Oil this was the solution at that time, when coal became scarce. People discovered oil and started using it, so this decreased the demand for carbon and the demand for oil increased so the prices for carbon became lower and the prices for oil started rising little by little. Practically this is what has happened always. How does this leave us better in the long run? Carbon polluted more than oil and affected people’s health more. Now what is going to replace oil, scientists have discovered many types of new energies renewable energies. Hydrogen, Solar and wind energy etc. are some…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The American Dream

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages

    American ecologist Garrett Hardin claimed “the good of the many outweigh the good of the individual” in his article “The Tragedy of the Commons.” In his quote, Hardin was referencing a current challenge and conflict society faces today. The “commons,” which are the shared lands and…

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Overpopulation is an issue which is constantly being debated upon, as the very aspect of humanity is at stake here. Paul R Ehrlich, Anne H Ehrlich, Frank Furedi and Vanessa Baird bring each of their unique perspectives to the table. Ehrlich and Ehrlich, in the abstract from “The Population Bomb Revisited”, believe that overpopulation is a problem that needs to be constantly addressed for humanity to survive in the long run. On the other hand, Furedi shares his views, in the article “Really Bad Ideas: Population Control”, about how he thinks the people that perceive overpopulation as a hindrance are the real problem here rather than overpopulation itself. Baird, from “Population Panic”, takes a neutral stand…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays