Preview

Garrett Hardin Lifeboat Ethics Summary

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
169 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Garrett Hardin Lifeboat Ethics Summary
Garrett Hardin, a human ecologist, wrote an analytical essay, Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor (1974), asserts that sharing resources with the poor will be detrimental to Earth’s limited resources along with its environments. Hardin supports his assertion by describing the negative effects of sharing the resources with the poor, using the idea of overpopulation and “tragedy of the commons”, stating that if foreign countries keeps aiding the poor, as population continue to grow along with their necessities, it will demolish the environment and deplete Earth’s natural resources. His purpose is to persuade his readers that the poor would not learn to survive on their own if they continue to rely on foreign aid. In this analytical

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the passage, Garett Hardin illustrates in “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping The Poor,” he describes his stand on global overpopulation and how it may effect on the resources. Hardin creates a scenario based on lifeboat to represents how the globe is divided into two class: rich and poor nations. Hardin, implies how the lifeboat represents the limit capacity of the lifeboat. The author is assuring if population keeps overleaping, that our resources are becoming limited.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In college it is a common sight to see students crowding a room on the first day to try to get a spot in a class that is a requirement to graduate, but most of them already know they might not be able to get a spot in the class. This phenomenon is an example of the idea of “lifeboat” ethics. Garrett Hardin, the writer of Lifeboat Ethics, said in his writings “So we sit here, say fifty people in our life boat... let us assume that it has room for ten more… [we] see one hundred others swimming in the water outside, begging for admission in to our boat...” (Hardin 415). Hardin’s Lifeboat Ethics is about the concept that we’re on a boat and we’re trying to decide who will get on the lifeboat and survive. Though we are not in the open sea, our…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    I chose Lifeboat Ethics: The Case against Helping the Poor, by Garret Hardin, to analyze because, out of all the readings I have ever done for English, this particular one is by far the most memorable. It is also perfectly suited for my argument, because it is appropriately as offensive as it is logical. The essay, in short, is a rhetorical argument that claims that helping the poor or unfortunate people of the world-though it is considered the “right” thing to do- is, in actuality, harmful to the very future of our species. The actual message of the essay, however, is not what I want to endorse. When this essay was assigned to my class junior year,…

    • 2561 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Garrett Hardin’s essay, Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor, Hardin describes the wealthy population of the world as being in a single lifeboat that is almost filled until buckling while the poor population of the world treads water below. Hardin’s essay gets his readers to feel the natural instinct to survive. The lifeboat metaphor that Hardin uses relieves the wealthy population of their moral obligations to the less fortunate, but in addition, puts all of the blame and cause of the depletion of earth’s resources on the poor. As much as his argument may make sense, there are some flaws in his way of thinking. Alan Durning, who noticed that major flaws with Hardin’s essay, wrote on what he thought about the topic that Hardin has brought to his attention. In Durning’s essay, Asking How Much Is Enough, he argues that it is not overpopulation that is depleting the earth’s resources, but overconsumption of the resources by the wealthy population. The arguments in Durning’s essay makes the reader realize that the way Hardin uses the metaphorical lifeboat to persuade his readers into thinking the same thing as he does and shows that Hardin wrongly places the blame of all of earth’s financial stability problems on the poorer population.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the United States and in many other countries when women get pregnant, they often talk about the immediate bond between mother and her unborn child. However, in other countries and cultures, women don't feel a bond with their unborn children until the child is born healthy, happy and grows to a certain age. There are people who think the issue of bonding with your child is culturally based and others argue that this bonding takes place naturally. While Nancy Scheper-Hughs argues that mother-infant bonding is culturally based and occurs over a period of time, Lucinda J. Peach refutes this argument by saying that there is an immediate and natural bond between a mother and unborn child. I will compare and contrast these two articles and their…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    PHI 208 Week 2 assignment

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In Peter Singer’s 1972 post titled “Famine, Affluence and Morality”, he conveys that wealthy nations, for example the United States, has an ethical duty to contribute much a lot more than we do with regards to worldwide assistance for famine relief and/or other disasters or calamities which may happen. In this document, I will describe Singers objective in his work and give his argument with regards to this problem. I will describe 3 counter-arguments to Singer’s view which he tackles, and after that reveal Singer’s reactions to those counter-arguments. I will explain Singer’s idea of marginal utility and also differentiate how it pertains to his argument. I will compare how the ideas of duty and charity alter in his suggested world. To conclude, I will provide my own reaction about this problem supporting singer’s argument. Should wealthier nations have a moral duty to relieve poorer nations if a disastrous event were to happen? I think that we all must contribute in times of need even if this means substantially modifying the way in which we live for the objective of assisting other people so long as it doesn't cause us to suffer.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aldo Leopold was a conservationist, forester philosopher, educator, writer and outdoor enthusiast and was among the founding fathers of the North American conservation movement during the first half of twentieth century (Leopold, 1981). He argues that humans are part of a community that includes the land, from the soil to the rivers and seas (Leopold, 1981). According to Leopold (1981), until humans recognize that they are part of the land and act accordingly, they will continue to negatively impact the environment and their own health by extension (Leopold, 1981)…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    geog257

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Quite often, environmental issues are discussed in terms of economic, political and/or social implications. Ethical issues, fundamental to the topic, are usually ignored. Failure to consider these issues is often understandable when the nature of pragmatic politics and economics is understood. Ethical positions are most often phrased as questions asking how we, as humans, relate to other humans individually, to other humans as groups, to other humans still to be born, to other forms of life and/or to entire sets ranging from ecosystems to the entire planet. Questions as to humans’ relations with nature are often raised as well as the relationship between technology and progress – for example, are gains from technological innovations mainly accrued by the wealthy and often at the expense of poor or dispossessed peoples? To what extent do technological innovations generate serious social and ecological problems? Is progress in meeting human needs always at the expense of nature? Is the biotechnology revolution in agriculture in the best interest of both humanity and nature? Questions such as these will be dealt with as our course proceeds during the semester.…

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Life Boat Ethical Analysis

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Aristotle, a famous Greek philosopher, had a theory of trying to simplify the task of arguing by dividing and classifying arguments into three types. The three types are called Logos or logic-base, Pathos or emotion based, and Ethos or credibility based. The two classic essays, “Life Boat Ethics” by Garrett Hardin and “A Modest Proposal” by Johnathan Swift, the writers make good suggestions with these types of arguments over world population and world famine.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Garrett Hardin’s “Lifeboat Ethics” he explains that the world we live in is unequal and becoming increasingly poor. He tries to explain that if the poor isn’t controlled then the Earth will become overpopulated and unrestrained. I believe that Hardin’s writing of “Lifeboat Ethics” is effective and persuasive. His writing is persuasive because with every action to fix the poorness of our world he has a counter, Hardin uses numbers and percentages to show how the population increases of poor countries versus rich ones, and he also paints pictures in people’s heads very well.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main reason is that most people living in industrialized countries refuse to acknowledge the issue. They believe that lessening consumption will mean large sacrifices on their part, as they will forced to give up their comfortable way of life (Baltz, 1999, p. 214). This attitude shows that many are not willing to change their lifestyles, even if it means reducing inequality and suffering for thousands of people in developing countries. Effective altruists aim to work for the benefit of as many people as possible, especially of the poor in developing countries. Here, we can see that instead of recognizing that everyone deserves an equal share in the Earth’s resources, many consumers would rather prioritize themselves and protect their own interests at the cost of other people’s welfare.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boat of Ethics

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hardin begin's his essay shedding light on a metaphor environmentalists use to help prevent pollution, stating that the earth is a spaceship, and no one has the right to waste or destroy what should be equally shared between it's inhabitants. Hardin immediately disputes this metaphor by asking "does everyone on earth have an equal right to an equal share of it's resources?" (358) Hardin points out that this metaphor causes unrealistic expectations of an equal and fair global society since there are currently not enough resources in the world to be evenly distributed. Hardin argues that the spaceship analogy is false, saying that "A true spaceship would have to be under the control of a captain, since no ship could possibly survive if its course were determined by committee. Spaceship Earth certainly has no captain; the United States is merely a toothless tiger, with little power to enforce any policy upon its bickering members." (358) Hardin instead…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Examining the title of Garrett Hardin’s “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case against Helping the Poor”, we could deduce the rich nations and or people are the lifeboats and the poor nations are the people adrift in the sea clamoring to get aboard. Each lifeboat has limited capacity. Complete generosity, justice and equality would equal complete catastrophe for all. Complete selfishness, unjust and discrimination would result in two outcomes: disaster for one group and survival for the other. As the World’s superpower, we should have the means to find a happy medium, and invoke it as regularly as possible.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In order to do this, mankind must acknowledge the interdependence of each part of the community. In a society that values imperialism and views the Land as a commodity belonging to it, the idea of loving and caring for the Land as a necessity to the health of the entire biota seems unnatural. However this is far from the truth; without a unity between man and the Land, the community does not function as it should. In one of Leopold’s essays, entitled “River of the Mother of God”, he states that “The Land consists of soil, water, plants, and animals, but health is more than a sufficiency of these components. It is a state of vigorous self-renewal in each of them, and in all collectively. Such collective functioning of interdependent parts for the maintenance of the whole is characteristic of an organism” (310). It is therefore humankind’s responsibility to love, cherish, protect, and conserve the Land just as another member of the community. If not, the whole “organism” will not function or have capacity for self-renewal. Leopold goes on to say that “A thing is right when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the biotic community. It is wrong when it tends otherwise” (224,225). Not only is it right, but essential to preserve the Land, or the entire biotic community will be at stake. This is the main theme behind Leopold’s writings, and the Land Ethic will require man to…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The American Dream

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages

    American ecologist Garrett Hardin claimed “the good of the many outweigh the good of the individual” in his article “The Tragedy of the Commons.” In his quote, Hardin was referencing a current challenge and conflict society faces today. The “commons,” which are the shared lands and…

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays