Preview

Cosmopolitanism and People

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1125 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cosmopolitanism and People
Alexander Loza
Professor: Corissa Eisenman
Date: 4/21/2015

The best ways to meet the challenges of community and human
Interaction in the Internet Age

The Internet is playing a very important role in the evolution of digital technology, but although it has seen remarkable growth over the last few years, its dispersion remains highly asymmetric. It is widely believed that the so called information age will bring radical change and improvement, and countries all over the world are busy with constructing the necessary infrastructure, the "information superhighways," in order to meet the challenges of the information society of the twenty-first century. Kwame Anthony Appiah’s essay “Making Conversation” tell us about human’s conversation is better expressing themselves in person. Marshall Poe said in his article “The Hive” talks about the evolution of Wikipedia and how people are interacting online. The internet serves a purpose for research, schoolwork, and connections. However, the result from the internet age is loosing communication,lack of social interaction, and the unreliable nature of websites.
First, Communication is key with success, however because of the internet age the ability to communicate face to face is dwindling.“Making Conversation” by Appiah is an idea on the expression cosmopolitanism and the feeling people in any nation have to take in order to achieve cosmopolitanism and globalization. Appiah wants to be citizen in the world not to separate by culture because people can learn each other different culture from other countries. Appiah said “One is the idea that we have obligations to others, obligations to others, obligations that stretch beyond those to whom we are related by the ties of kith and kind, or even the more formal ties of shared citizenship. The other is that we take seriously the value not just of human life but of particular human lives, which means taking an interest in the practices and beliefs that lend them significance”

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This society however, does not envelop certain communities but rather the entire world. In Making Conversation, Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a world of strangers, Appiah introduces us to cosmopolitanism: an almost contradictory ideology based around the belief that people can and will get along, as long as they “make conversation,” so to speak. Appiah also dives into how global communication has its downsides, the history of cosmopolitanism, partial cosmopolis, his personal experiences with this ideology and the worldview post 9/11. His structure is very informal and at times, choppy, however he does explain his thesis to a well versed extent and proves his understanding on the subject by defining the ideology thoroughly and countering his own arguments and reaffirming them with following explanations. Nevertheless, he is lacking in some areas and is not without his faults, where lack of analysis betrays him and his overall extremely optimistic worldviews portray him as somewhat daft.…

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The internet has become an effortless way to acquire new information and answer questions that one may ponder. In “Experts Say Google Does Not Make Us Stupid” by David Weir, Weir suggests that the internet has allowed humans to accommodate to the modern lifestyle and break away from traditional methods of obtaining information. Weir is proposing that the internet has provided a way to more efficiently meet the demands…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Consider the mindsets of cosmopolitanism, geocentrism, and sociocentrism. Which of these makes the most valuable contribution to organizational leadership? Why?…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    carr

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Internet and other forms of technology have been involved in the reformation of our lives. The article, "Is Google Making Us Stupid," by Nicholas Carr primarily focuses on the influence of the internet on our thinking behaviors, while in the article "Another Look Back, and a Look Ahead," by Edward Tenner mainly focuses on advances and setbacks of that go hand in hand with technology. In the modern world, technology has been an extremely vital well of knowledge that contributes to our lives. The internet includes all sorts of information on all topics one can think of. It allows for us to answer all of our questions with a very simple steps. Even though the internet and technology are undeniably important assets of the modern world, people should rely more on their skills rather than relying on technology for all their necessities. The ability to socialize with others is more important than the internet. It is the basis of our lives and the only method of communication between human beings. There have been more cases of social awkwardness than ever before, and it is believed to be connected with the internet. Simply sitting down in front of a monitor and searching for all that we need isolates us from those around us and takes away some of our social abilities, thus making it harder and more awkward to get back into society.…

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cosmopolitanism and Person

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The point of Appiah's essay is to explain the topic of cosmopolitanism is today's society. Basically, Appiah explains someone who is a cosmopolitan as "a citizen of the world"; it is also "our responsibility to exchange ideas about what is right and wrong in the world." We must also realize that we are responsible for other people in the world, and that every person has a different positive contribution that they can make to the "whole." He uses words, such as "shared humanity," to show that while humans may be spread all over the globe and live different lives, there are also many things that we share in common about everyday life. However, problems are caused when people cannot tolerate others or aren't open to diversity. There are also people who believe that in order to work together with another person, that person must "be like them." Overall, as long as we can work against the negatives, Appiah thinks that cosmopolitanism will be a very important factor in any successful community. The point of Appiah's essay is to explain the topic of cosmopolitanism is today's society. Basically, Appiah explains someone who is a cosmopolitan as "a citizen of the world"; it is also "our responsibility to exchange ideas about what is right and wrong in the world." We must also realize that we are responsible for other people in the world, and that every person has a different positive contribution that they can make to the "whole." He uses words, such as "shared humanity," to show that while humans may be spread all over the globe and live different lives, there are also many things that we share in common about everyday life. However, problems are caused when people cannot tolerate others or aren't open to diversity. There are also people who believe that in order to work together with another person, that person must "be like them." Overall, as long as we can work against the negatives, Appiah thinks that cosmopolitanism will be a very important factor in any…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cosmopolitanism: Cultures

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The essay “Making Conversation” by Kwame Antony Appiah is a reflection on the term “cosmopolitanism” and the steps people in any nation have to take in order to achieve “cosmopolitanism” and “globalization”. He brings up the point of how all cultures have their similarities and differences and in most cases these differences are so different that it makes these cultures hard to connect with one another. He believes that conversation is the first and most important step to the understanding of others. Appiah explains how all cultures have standards that they believe to be the norm and how some cultures with also find these customs acceptable while others will find them repulsive. Due to the nature of all human beings, people tend to only think of themselves as having the correct views on the world and are less accepting of the beliefs of others. I wholeheartedly agree with Appiah as he says how small agreements essential to eventually having two cultures that work in harmony for long periods of time. Over time, this will eventually open up people’s minds to other cultures, customs and beliefs. Citizens of each culture will then learn to accept the beliefs of others and by “changing our minds” we will slowly move towards becoming more cosmopolitan and globalized. But only when all citizens of a nation become completely accepting of everyone’s beliefs without necessarily agreeing with them at all will the nation and culture fit the definition of cosmopolitan and become completely globalized. Only the nations that will strive to accept other cultures will become globalized. These countries will then become an asset to communications between all other countries on this Earth and become a successful and thriving…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Social Edge, an online forum sponsored by The Skoll Foundation, functions as an example of Kwame Appiah’s concept of cosmopolitanism because it opens channels of conversation between people of diverse backgrounds through a shared dedication to solving social injustices by utilizing social entrepreneurship. According to the Skoll Foundation a social entrepreneur can be defined a “creator[s] of innovations that disrupt the status quo and transform our world for the better”. The Skoll Foundation strives to accomplish large-scale change by investing in innovators committed to solving the planet’s most pressing problems. In June of 2003 they launched their project, The Social Edge, as an online global community intended to“ foster frank dialogue, mutual respect and a sense of community among all in the [social benefit] sector”. This mission statement and the subsequent formation of it’s intentions are reflective of the proponents of Appiah’s ideal of Cosmopolitanism because amidst of diversity, the forum supports a meaningful exchange of ideas in a polite and engaging manner. In this case, theory and practice can become synonymous because the constituents of the conversation share the same level of education and professionalism necessary to actualize their desire to pursue social justness.…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    As one section of the syllabus states, “our interactions are transitioning from point and click, multi-touch, and typing to talking, gesturing, behaving, and even thinking” with objects that will become “social” when connected to the Internet. This raises some interesting conflictions with the Symbolic Interactionist view of society. George Herbert Mead defines society itself as the product of meaningful social interactions; however, the Internet of…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nicholas Carr argues in his article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” that the internet is changing the way we think and work for the worst. I have to disagree. Although the internet is changing us, it’s for the better. First, the internet has become a great equalizer in terms of education. Second, communicating across the web allows for intercultural experiences that were once impossible without a plane ticket. Third, even though Carr may feel uncomfortable with his brain being molded by the web, the younger generation has only ever known the internet and as such is better suited to the vastness of it.…

    • 861 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Habermas' Public Sphere

    • 2485 Words
    • 10 Pages

    What gives the clash of coffee shop talks and online participation in the discussion by commenting on the news? Surely, this differs from what an influential political scientist Samuel Huntington wrote about in his book “Clash of civilization”. The case with civilization is merely an upgrade of cultures but burdening and open issue among politicians. As for the “clash” of the natural discussion in an open air practiced in the XVII century with the global networking is about upgrade of communication. The latter is vice versa to the first is warmly welcomed by the contemporary communicators. Internet enlarged the scale of discussion as well as it made it right away.…

    • 2485 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    I. Communication refers to a network of networks that consists of millions of users from around the globe that are linked by a broad array of electronics such as computers, cell phones and so on.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    What are the differences between cosmopolitan and communitarian approaches to global politics? S) A P d x d A…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Culture and Globalization

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cavusgil, Knight and Riesenberger define globalization of markets as the ongoing economic integration and growing interdependency of countries worldwide (2008, 4). From an economic point of view, globalization is reduction in, or removal of, foreign trade barriers in order to facilitate the flows of goods across borders (Leidner 2010, 1). Cultural globalization takes a more anthropological point of view, and refers to “a phenomenon by which the experience of everyday life, as influenced by the diffusion of commodities and ideas, reflects a standardization of cultural expression around the world” (Britannica Encyclopedia).…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Media

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Michael Wesch who is an associate professor of cultural anthropology and media ecologist who explores the effects of new media on human interaction, society and culture introduced web 2.0. Web 2.0 is a name given to the Internet which explains how the web has been extended and developed into a ‘social web’ where the users are in fact the web. Therefore it is collaboration on the World Wide Web. Opinions are posted worldwide through blogging and wiki. Websites or web pages can now be easily created as you no longer have to know the HTML codes. The web is now an interactive institution where anyone can participate in commenting on other peoples work and putting across their point of view. The web has been named a collaborative medium, which is a place where we could all meet and read and write.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays