Preview

Classical School

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
878 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Classical School
Classical School 1

RUNNING HEAD: Classical School

Sheryl McCullough
August 24, 2011
Kaplan University
Organizational Development for Health Care
Professor Coppola

Classical School 2

This paper is about Classical School of Management. In this paper I will discuss what Classical School is, when it was started and how it can be used in today’s work force. I will also answer the following scenario that was presented to me as a director of a Tri-County Home Health Agency how would I handle a lay-off and what steps would I follow.
Classical School of management began in the late 1800s and continued through the 1950s. It included such theorists as Henri Fayol, Mary Parker Follett, Henry Grant, and Max Weber. They believed in structured management approaches, and that money motivates employees (Dunn, 2010). The classical school of management emphasizes “command and control.” Henri Fayol is also known as the father of modern management he defined administrative management how to structure an organization for high performance (Dunn, 2010). In Classical School you can identify how modern the management style is. This management style has developed five functions of management: planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating, and controlling. These five functions play an important role in management because you have to know plan and organize a team and company. You have to know how to coordinate a daily routine and how to control and command your employees so that they will get the work done like you want. Thanks to these contributors and others, the basic ideas regarding scientific management developed. They include the following: * Developing new standard methods for doing each job * Selecting, training, and developing workers instead of allowing them to choose their own tasks and train themselves

Classical



References: Dunn, R. (2010).  Dunn and Haimann’s Healthcare Management (9th ed). Chicago: Health Administration Press.  Cliff Notes. Principles of Management. Classical School of Management. Retrieved from www.cliffsnotes.com/study guide/Classical-Schools-of-Ma... Vogelzang, J. 2010. The Five Biggest Mistakes Employers Make When Laying Off Employees. Retrieved from. www.natlawreview.com/article/five-biggest-mistakes-employers.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 2 Mt140

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    First, we will start with the classical approach. It would be a type of management that the manager would be the head of a formal hierarchy, kind of like a dictator. This approach mostly focuses on performing tasks efficiently, so that they get the best results. This approach was also broken down into scientific and administrative management. The scientific part focuses on improving efficiency through studies and experiments. Administrative focuses on working as a team, instead of each to our own. These two parts create the foundation for management as we know it today.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Classical Management Theory (Pg37) A theory that focused in finding the “one best way” to perform and manage tasks.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Management has been studied by a lot of theorists who then learning from their own experiences came out with different theories and styles of management, explaining how to manage. The classical school has proven to be one of the most influential of all the schools. (Brooks 2009). Due to the success of the bureaucratic and scientific management style of managing, this essay will look into the bureaucratic style of management and then the scientific style of management and show that although these theories were developed during the turn of the twentieth century, they are still present in organisations today and are still very relevant to this day and age.…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The classical perspective emerged during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, and emphasized a rational, scientific approach to the study of management. The factory system of the 1800’s faced challenges such as tooling plants, organizing managerial structure, training non-English speaking employees (immigrants), scheduling, and resolving strikes. These new problems and the development of large complex organizations demanded a new perspective on coordination and control. The classical perspective contained three subfields, each with a slightly different emphasis – scientific management, bureaucratic organizations and administrative principles.…

    • 2905 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The classical approach was the framework to what management is all about. It was where all of the following theorists got their ideas from and then expanded on them. Therefore they can be said that they were the foundation thoughts for all the theorists. So most theorists are going to have quite a similar approach at the…

    • 1976 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Management vs Leadership

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In chapter one of Management, The New Competitive Landscape, 6E, it quotes Peter Drucker as saying, "Management means, in the last analysis, the substitution of thought for brawn and muscle, of knowledge for folklore and tradition, and of cooperation for force." Managing a company takes hard work and dedication to the company and to the employees which depend upon their superior's skills. Reaching that level in an organization requires education of the company and education regarding various departments. Management is the use and control of people or employees to efficiently and effectively accomplish a goal or task. There are several different management styles that a manager can utilize. Also, there are many effective management tools that a manager should use to effectively accomplish a task. Namely, managers should utilize the four functions of management. These functions include planning, organizing, leading, and controlling. Without these functions accomplishing tasks would seem unachievable and the organization its self would be disorganized. Therefore, it is very important to have someone in charge to utilize control mechanisms; which is another important step in the functions of management. Also someone needs to keep employees focused and on task. Management is made up of a person or multiple persons that have knowledge of all departments and the goals of each department. They then take that…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Classical organization theory has been around since the early 1900’s. This theory is associated with scientific management, bureaucratic theory, and administrative theory. A man named Frederick Taylor came up with scientific management theory in 1917 (Walonick, 1993). It was also called “Taylorism”. There are four principles to classical organizational theory. Find the “best way” to do the tasks, match workers to each task very carefully, use awards and punishment systems and supervise employees carefully, and planning and controlling (Walonick, 1993). Max Weber (1947) added on to Taylor’s theory. Weber came up with the bureaucratic theory, which had more “hierarchical structure of power” (Walonick,…

    • 1127 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Management Reflection

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Fayol is also famous for the classical ‘school of management’ in which command and control is emphasized and published in “General and Industrial management” which is still highly referred to a century later. Fayol taught that management was comprised of five major components: Planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating and controlling.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Henri Fayol, ‘planning, organising, co-ordinating, commanding and controlling’ (Fell 2000, p. 345), are the core functions behind successful management. At present, these functions have been condensed to four: plan, lead, organise and control. There is great debate as to the relevance of these functions in modern management theory. Fells (2000, p. 345) maintains that these functions have ‘stood the test of time’; and are ‘appropriate to contemporary management’. While others such as Henry Mintzberg have said ‘Fayol’s fifty year description of managerial work is no longer of use to us’(Stephen J. Carroll and Dennis J. Gillen, 1987). ‘Management is the planning, organising, leading and controlling of human and other resources to achieve organisational goals effectively and efficiently’ (Waddell, Devin, Jones, George, 2008, p.519). This definition is from a contemporary text book, which shows the use of Fayol’s functions in modern management teachings. While looking at the management functions shaped by Fayol, some of his functions are no longer seen as useful in modern day management.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientific Management

    • 2105 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The classical period extended from the mid-19th century through the early 1950’s. The major approaches that emerged during the period were systematic management, scientific management, administrative management, human…

    • 2105 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Contemporary Management

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The essay will endeavor to provide an insight into how Fayol’s basic principles of Classical Management Functions are indeed useful in describing managerial work. In the last (20th) century, the role of managers in business becomes more diverse as the number of tasks in which businesses were involved in significantly grew in quantity and complexity. As a result there was an increased interest in the most effective and efficient method of management. This led to the development of different management theories, which included classical management functions which one (1) could argue led to management being defined as the process of organizing tasks through employees to make sure that goals and objectives are met efficiently. (Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter 2006, p. 9).…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Management is said to have no fixed definition, but different authorities on management have different views on it. The foundations of organizational behavior are based on the theories of two classical management entrepreneurs, F W Taylor and Henri Fayol[->0], these management theorists, although focusing on different aspects of Classical Management and organization have been fused as central and essential theories in Organizational behavior. The Scientific management which bases on the Classical Taylorism theory produced by Fedrick Taylor in 1880’s and 1890’s is distinctive from what Fayol contributed towards Behaviourist management also known as Administrative management. Both these theories are of great importance and thus, beneficial however with a couple of criticisms attributed to both. Even today a number of significant businesses evolve around these two management theories and thus, its implementation and outcomes are also observed in the modern world today. Although there are many other theories on management that include; Bureaucratic Organization of Weber. The Neo-Classical Theory that includes the Human Relations Movement of Mayo along with others like Roethsilberger and Dickson and the Behavioural Schools of Maslow, McGregor, Herzberg, Argyris, etc. There also exists another theory known as The Modern Management Theory. Taylor mainly concentrated on work organization such as productive efficiency whereas Fayol particularly focused on authority and its implementation/fulfilment. Taylorism is often mentioned with regard to Fordism, as it was closely associated with mass production methods in factories which was observed in Ford productions as well. Whereas Fayolism advocated a consistent set of principles that all organizations would generally apply/require/need to run effectively/properly.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The classical approach to management is typically known as the scientific or autocratic approach. I intend to investigate three of the original classical management theorists; Taylor, Weber and Fayol, and discuss their principles coming to my own conclusion as to whether their views are still relevant in today’s society.…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Classical Theory

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Classical management theory involves creating multiple levels of workers to improve productivity. Employees at the lowest levels find their tasks overseen by supervisors who, in turn, are overseen by managers. At every level, employees are expected to perform tasks according to specific procedures designed to maximize productivity. In addition, this theory focuses on an impersonal side of business. Employees and managers should not allow friendliness and personal interactions to become involved with the organization. Rules must be followed exactly, and the hiring and firing of employees must relate only to the skills they possess.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Henri Fayol is credited for systematically coining management functions (planning, organising, commanding, coordinating and controlling). “To manage is to forecast and plan, to organise, to command, to co-ordinate and to control" (Fayol, 1949). Gulick and Urwick (1937) expanded Fayol 's list to seven executive management activities summarised by the acronym POSDCORB:…

    • 2062 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics