California School Lunch Policy
The recent medical studies point a deep concern about the increasing risk for developing child obesity, osteoporosis, dental caries, and heart diseases. Area of problems encompasses high intakes of saturated fat, total fat, soft drinks, and low intakes of fiber, fruits, and vegetables. As a result, First Lady Michelle Obama has launched a new menu lunch mandating a maximum calories of 650 for elementary; 700, middle school; and 850, high school. However, the current California lunch policy reflecting the recommendation of the first lady turns out to be a flop in altering student’s perspective nutrition and health. In fact, the new lunch program is inferior to its predecessor.
The obtrusive limitation of the current lunch policy lies on two key factors—time and appetite. For one thing, the current lunch time given to students is approximately 30 minutes, not enough time for digesting food with high in fiber and low in calories after the everlasting lunch lines. Students can devoured a pizza and a hamburger expeditiously with few bites whereas students can only nibble away black been burgers, tasteless salad with a drink they disgust with. Not surprisingly, the students from L.A. United School meals are “being rejected in en masse.” Who would want wait a long lunch line for food they annoy? Who would have an appetite to battle with fruits and veggies when they could wait an hour and eat what they savor. Clearly, a successful meal should be the ones that could restore kids’ appetites and reduce eating time. In turn, this may transform student’s life style.
Equally important, it is costly ineffective to continue the current lunch program in California. “Participation in the school lunch program has dropped by thousands,” says the report from LA schools. Therefore, Principals have voiced “massive waste, with unopened milk cartons and uneaten entrees being thrown away.” Consider the overwhelming cost to operate a school cafeteria: hiring workers for serving and
The obtrusive limitation of the current lunch policy lies on two key factors—time and appetite. For one thing, the current lunch time given to students is approximately 30 minutes, not enough time for digesting food with high in fiber and low in calories after the everlasting lunch lines. Students can devoured a pizza and a hamburger expeditiously with few bites whereas students can only nibble away black been burgers, tasteless salad with a drink they disgust with. Not surprisingly, the students from L.A. United School meals are “being rejected in en masse.” Who would want wait a long lunch line for food they annoy? Who would have an appetite to battle with fruits and veggies when they could wait an hour and eat what they savor. Clearly, a successful meal should be the ones that could restore kids’ appetites and reduce eating time. In turn, this may transform student’s life style.
Equally important, it is costly ineffective to continue the current lunch program in California. “Participation in the school lunch program has dropped by thousands,” says the report from LA schools. Therefore, Principals have voiced “massive waste, with unopened milk cartons and uneaten entrees being thrown away.” Consider the overwhelming cost to operate a school cafeteria: hiring workers for serving and