Preview

Abel Fields Case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
408 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Abel Fields Case
Abel Fields was a 39-year-old California resident who claimed he served in the military and received a purple heart at a city meeting he attended for public safety. Each one of Abel Field’s claims were false. He had not served in the military and had not received a purple heart. He was prosecuted and convicted under the Stolen Valor Act. The Stolen Valor Act states that it is a crime to make false claims about receiving military medals and awards. The law stated, “fraudulent claims surrounding the receipt of the Medal of Honor, the distinguished-service cross, the Navy cross, the Air Force cross, the Purple Heart, and other decorations and medals awarded by the President or the Armed Forces of the United States” (Stolen Valor Act of 2005). Consequently, the nature of his crime broke the law and he was fined $1,000. In its past decisions, the Supreme Court has reminded us that there are “categories of speech . . . fully outside the protection of the first amendment” (United States v. Stevens, 2010). In Gertz v. Robert Welch, the Supreme Court opinion claimed that protecting false speech constitutionally might damage this …show more content…
The First Amendment protected Field’s actions; however, he did break the Stolen Valor Act of 2006. If the Stolen Valor Act was not in affect, he would have been protected and most likely not been charged. The first amendment gives people the right to free speech and has no specific restrictions on speech. Therefore, following the Bill of Rights he was wrongly charged. Unfortunately, under the Stolen Valor Act, he pretended to get a military award he did not, and because the claims he made were false, he was charged

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1. What is the most “jealously” protected kind of speech, according to the court in this case? (3 points)…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is it constitutional to take away money from a person although it was gained for an interview with a publisher about one’s past crimes? Is it constitutional to take the money and give it to the victim of these past crimes? Does this or does not contradict the First Amendment which allows to express one’s mind freely with no discrimination concerning the context? The dispute over the Son of Sam law can be lead down to one question: whether speaking about crime is also a crime. Obviously, there could be two answers, one negative, and another one positive. According to the Son of Sam law, there is only one interpretation: if a…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Castro, M. (2009, September 7). Former client sues WilmerHale over dropped 'don 't ask, don 't tell ' case. Retrieved October 18, 2010, from BizJournals: http://www.bizjournals.com/washington/stories/2009/09/07/newscolumn3.html…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Branzburg v. Hayes was the only ever supreme court case to deal with reporter’s privilege. The ruling of this case was that reporter’s had no right to hide their sources in a court case. The chief justice at the time,Warren Burger, made a point that reporters, “like other citizens, [must] respond to relevant questions put to them in the course of a valid grand jury investigation or criminal trial (Fargo,2010).” With a decision that was five for and four against, this case was not an open and shut many thought it to be. Calling into play a look at the first amendment and what it really means when it says the freedom of speech. Interpreting a document that is more than two hundred years old is not an easy task to accomplish, having to combine…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Abel Fields was then convicted under the Stolen Valor Act, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $1,000. However, Fields appealed his decision arguing that the act was unconstitutional because his rights to free speech has been violated. His argument is completely invalid because his lies were made intentionally so it should not be protected. Fields should still be convicted since he has never…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The cop framed Rubin for many crimes because of the resources available to him but I believe the US’s constitution should create something like The Charter Of Rights and Freedoms in order to…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Training Day Violations

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alonzo and Jake pulled over a vehicle after viewing them buy drugs for recreational use. They used violent confrontation and intimidation towards the suspects and citizens, along while they seized they drugs. It triggered the citizens constitutional right but because the drugs were not in plain sight, nor did…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    THESIS: The first amendment of the constitution of the United States protects our right to freedom of speech. However, the freedom to speak should not entitle the speaker to purposely hurt another person by revealing private matters or spreading rumors and lies.…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The right to freedom of speech came under scrutiny in the case of John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General, et al. versus Free Speech Coalition, et al. in 2002. In this case, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the Ninth Circuit's judgment against the plaintiff’s broader definition of pornography in enacting the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996. This broader definition, the court finds it in contravention with the First Amendment. The Ninth Circuit reasoned that the definition of banning any depiction of pornographic materials, including films that Congress adds on the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 was overboard and as such violated the First Amendment. Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote: "First Amendment freedoms are most in danger…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lovelace, C. (2012, Jan 27). Military vets aren’t protected class, but supreme court case makes suing employer easier. Columbus Business First, Retrieved from http://www.bizjournals.com/columbus/print-edition/2012/01/27/military-vets-arent-protected-class.html?page=all…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kirby vs. Illinois

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Facts: On February 21, 1968, a man named Willie Shard reported to the Chicago police that the previous day two men had robbed him on a Chicago street of a wallet containing, among other things, traveler's checks and a Social Security card. On February 22, two police officers stopped the petitioner and a companion, Ralph Bean, on West Madison Street in Chicago. When asked for identification, the petitioner produced a wallet that contained three traveler's checks and a Social Security card, all bearing the name of Willie Shard. Papers with Shard's name on them were also found in Bean's possession. When asked to explain his possession of Shard's property, the petitioner first said that the traveler's checks were "play money," and then told the officers that he had won them in a crap game. The officers then arrested the petitioner and Bean and took them to a police station.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    come home

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages

    "This is a civil rights matter," Attorney General Eric Holder says. "In many ways, I think it's akin to the struggle that African-Americans went through in the '50s and the '60s to demand equal treatment, to be allowed to enjoy all the benefits that flow to a person who is nothing more than an American citizen."…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Social Media on Sexuality

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the Holmes case was a consolidation of two Military Officers, Lieutenant Watson and Holmes, who were discharged under the “DADT” Policy. They were discharged on the fact that the service members stated that they were Homosexuals. The policy afforded them the opportunity to provide evidence that they were individuals who do not engage in homosexual activity. They two Officers used the military courts to fight the policy based on their military record of service. Despite their outstanding record they were eventually discharged. They eventually filed complaints that their Fifth; equal protection, and First Amendment rights; freedom of speech, have been violated. In Watson’s complaint the Navy argued that the discharge was based on the likelihood homosexual conduct rather than the expression of homosexual conduct (Goitein, 1998). This seems to be a major play on words from the Navy during the complaint and was eventually…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    MGMT520

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Answer: According to the court in this case, the most jealousy protected speech is that which advances the free, uninhibited flow of ideas and opinions on matters of public interest and concern. That which is addressed to matters of private concern, or focuses upon persons who are not “public figures” is less stringently protected.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Standing Up For Others

    • 394 Words
    • 1 Page

    Another example is when a young 13 year old and a group of her friends showed up for school one day. They were wearing black arm bands to mourn the death of Vietnam and all of them including her were suspended. They also faced harassment and many death threats. The ACLU came to her defense, winning a landmark Supreme Court decision in “Tinker v. Des Moines (19969)”.…

    • 394 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays