Team 11C 3rd National Law School International Arbitration Moot Court Competition‚ 2010 Court of International Arbitration‚ Gregaria City‚ Gregaria Mallory Advisory Services Ltd.………………………………………………………Claimant v. Shawcross Solutions Pvt. Ltd…………………………………………………….Respondent 1 Comet (Shawcross) Solutions Pvt. Ltd…………………………………………...Respondent 2 (Arb/Cas/0410/2009) Memorandum for Claimant Table of Contents Table of Contents i Table of Abbreviations iv Index of Authorities
Premium Contract Arbitration
------------------------------------------------- Top of Form | | MANU/SC/0092/1986Equivalent Citation: I(1987)ACC157‚ 1987ACJ386‚ AIR1987SC1086‚ (1987)1CompLJ99(SC)‚ JT1987(1)SC1‚ 1986(2)SCALE1188‚ (1987)1SCC395‚ 1986Supp(1)SCC562‚ [1987]1SCR819IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIAWrit Petition (Civil) No. 12739 of 1985Decided On: 20.12.1986Appellants: M.C. Mehta and another Vs. Respondent: Union of India and othersHon’ble Judges: G. L. Oza‚ K. N. Singh‚ M. M. Dutt‚ P. N. Bhagwati and Ranganath Misra‚ JJ.Counsels:
Free United States Constitution
which the shop was closed for trading. The law in question must therefore consider if the remained open until the last day of March or the offer did in fact finish on the last day of trading in march‚ which would have been Friday the 30th. The Court of Appeal Case of Dickson and Dodds as reported in ********* held that if an offer clearly states it is open until a certain date‚ it may be withdrawn at any point prior to that date. Following the rule‚ the shop sign therefore clearly states ‘offer
Premium Contract
Functional areas of Business Jitender Singh MGT/521 Feb 04‚ 2013 Dr. HOMAYOUN JAMASBI Functional areas of Business Introduction I work as Vice President for Global Wealth Management at Bank of America with more than 12 years of experience. The functional areas where I need to focus on are developing the leadership and operational skills. Two functional areas of business of interest Having an MBA will help me to grow as a leader in the management role; the two functional areas of the business
Premium Management Leadership
5th Inter Year Moot Court Competition‚ 2015 Dhaka University Moot Court Society (DUMCS) Arash Housing Ltd. represented by Sadman Khan vs. Nibash Housing Ltd. represented by Aziz Ahmed and others 1. Mr. Aziz Ahmed is a land owner and a developer having real estate business. He is also the Managing Director of ‘Nibash Housing Ltd.’ having power to deal with every matter of the company.Every year this company makes a profit of around tk. 50 million. This company is well reputed for its fulfillment
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Contract Supreme court
ASSESSMENT DETAILS Unit Code BSBMKG501B Unit Title Identify and evaluate marketing opportunities Assessment No. 1 Assessment Title Project and Presentation | Case Study - CARSALES STUDENT DETAILS Student’s Name JITENDER AKKARI Student ID No. S10928 Group No. 27 Date of Submission 24/05/14 ASSESSOR DETAILS Assessor’s Name vishal Assessment Site Angad Australian Institute of Technology‚ (AAIT) PROJECT REPORT | CARSALES CASE STUDY Table of Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Background 3 3. Market analysis
Premium Discrimination Marketing
I. Introduction a. Since their creation in the 1990’s‚ problem-solving courts have become of much interest to the legal community. Not only are these courts revolutionary in their way of processing cases‚ but also they are proving to have great success rates. One of the most important aspects of the problem-solving courts is how much more involved a judge is with each case. In traditional courts‚ a judge will most likely read off the names of the people in the docket‚ and simply sentence an individual
Premium Law Judge Jury
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT‚ GAUTENG (REPULIC OF SOUTH AFRICA) CASE NUMBER: 10/2012 In the Appeal between: HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT‚ FREE STATE APPELLANT And JOLENE PAKKIES Acting on behalf of Dineo Tau Zozo Tau Lulu Tau RESPONDENT ___________________________________________________________________________ HEADS OF ARGUMENT OF APPELLANT ___________________________________________________________________________ In an Appeal to the Constitutional Court the Appellant‚ the
Premium Childhood Constitution United States Constitution
accounts appear on their victim’s credit report. They may change the billing address for a credit card so that the victim no longer receives bills‚ and then run up charges on the account. It may be some time before the victim realizes there’s a problem because the bills are being sent to a different address. Phone or utilities fraud: They may open a new phone or wireless account in their victim’s name or run up charges on an existing account. They may use their victim’s name to get utility services
Premium Identity theft Credit card fraud
American courts have carefully expanded mandatory disclosure by the prosecutor‚ especially with respect to disclosures of exculpatory evidence and impeachment material. Exculpatory evidence is any evidence that might exonerate the defendant at trial by either tending to cast doubt on defendant’s guilt or by tending to mitigate the defendant’s culpability‚ thereby potentially reducing the defendant’s sentence (David W. Neubauer & Henry F. Fradella). In Brady v. Maryland‚ he U.S Supreme Court held that
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Brady v. Maryland Criminal law