"Kantianism" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 4 of 23 - About 221 Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Kant‚ the fundamental principle of morality must be a categorical‚ rather than a hypothetical imperative‚ because an imperative based on reason alone is one that is a necessary truth‚ is a priori‚ and is one that applies to us because we are rational beings capable of fulfilling our moral obligations. Kant explains this essential truth is how "an action as objectively necessary in itself apart from its relation to a further end". This refers to how if the supreme principle of morality

    Premium Morality Immanuel Kant Ethics

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant’s Categorical Imperative and the Golden Rule Kant’s categorical imperative is to will without contradiction and is tested by universalizability. The golden rule is similar to this notion in that it is a universally moral principle that forces one to imagine both positions of an action. However‚ the two contrast more than they compare. The categorical imperative is an objective imperative‚ making one morally required to act according to it without exception. It addresses our maxims‚ the

    Premium Immanuel Kant Categorical imperative Logic

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Categorical Imperative

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages

    PHI2600.001 The difference between Kant’s Hypothetical imperative and categorical imperative is this; Hypothetical imperative is driven by desire. They tell you what you should do only if you have the desire. For example if someone wanted to become a boxer (he had the desire to become a boxer) he would have to work out and train to become one. That would be one hypothetical imperative‚ another example is perhaps someone has the desire to become a doctor‚ well then he would need to go to college

    Premium Question Categorical imperative Hypothetical imperative

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This essay aims to argue the views of two different theorist‚ Jeremy Bentham and Immanuel Kant‚ with regards to their views on moral worth of an action. The idea of good and bad creates heated debates among many‚ but this essay will successfully unravel the layers of Bentham’s theory of Utilitarianism and his belief that all our motives are driven by pleasure and pain. While arguing Kant’s opposing argument that moral worth of an act revolves around democratic attitudes‚ and that moral truths are

    Premium Ethics Morality Immanuel Kant

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emmanuel Kant (hereinafter “Kant”) believes that Ethics is categorical and states that our moral duties are not dependent on feelings but on reason. He further states that our moral duties are unconditional‚ universally valid‚ and necessary‚ regardless of the possible consequences or opposition to our inclinations (Pojman and Vaughn 239). Kant writes about two formulations of his categorical imperative‚ the first being Universal law. The formulation of Universal Law is the basis of Categorical

    Premium Morality Immanuel Kant Ethics

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Kant means in "acting out of duty" is that one must act based on what they feel is right in their heart. There needs to be no motive or influence behind it‚ but just to act as what should be considered right. Acting out of duty is to act "out of concern and respect for the moral law" (McKinnon‚ pg.76). I think this type of acting out on a situation is based on what the heart feels‚ sympathy perhaps to a certain situation. Moral law is based on knowing what is right and what is wrong with judgement

    Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant created a handful of formulations regarding his system of determining morality‚ the Categorical Imperative. James and Stuart Rachels in The Elements of Moral Philosophy‚ illuminate Kant’s first and second Categorical Imperatives. While Kant claims the formulations are equivalent‚ they offer differing guidelines on how the Categorical Imperative is operated. Although the formulations share the same basis‚ the difference regarding how the formulations are adhered‚ is a large distinction

    Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant’s Deontological Ethics Immanuel Kant is a German philosopher (1724-1804)‚ who had contributed on the arenas of philosophy‚ war‚ peace‚ science‚ beauty & geography. The word deontology is derived from the Greek word “Deon”‚ meaning duty and “tology” mean theory (Mackinnon & Fiala 2018). The base idea of Kant’s Deontological ethics is just to do our duty in any circumstances. Thus‚ a moral agent should act for the sake of good and motivated by obligation or duty‚ not for an ulterior motive. In

    Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Spelman Vs Kant

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When talking about philosophy‚ there are many different theories of ethics. Some philosophers believe different things‚ or they expand on previous philosophies. Two theories in particular are Immanuel Kant’s deontological theory. This deals with the categorical imperative‚ and Elizabeth Spelman’s theory which discusses the ethics of care‚ and the ethics of justice. Although these theories are separated by centuries‚ they complement each other. Both theories discuss how to make ethical decisions.

    Premium Immanuel Kant Morality Ethics

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    "So will such that the maxim of your will could become a universal law for all men." Kant is saying your actions‚ based on good will‚ can apply to all; so that good moral judgments made can become universal for everyone. Kant believed a person’s motive‚ his intentions of an action are what decides if the action is morally right or wrong—not the end result of that action or decision. Kant’s categorical imperative approach says a person has the moral duty to do what is right‚ because it is

    Premium Immanuel Kant Categorical imperative Philosophy

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 23