"Kantianism" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 2 of 23 - About 221 Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morality‚ Kant believes is founded on pure reason and his goals are to find a supreme principle of morality. He looks to find this supreme principle of morality by finding some criteria to sort maxims into two categories those who are morally okay and those who are not. Kant eventually finds the meaning of his supreme principle of morality‚ the rules include it is clearly synthetic‚ it is clearly a priori‚ and is therefore an example of pure reason. According to the book “maxims are rules that express

    Premium Ethics Morality Immanuel Kant

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant's Second Imperative

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant’s first imperative deals with universality and the Law of Nature. Kant states that for a moral thought to be true it must not be tied to any external conditions‚ physical or moral and should be applied to anyone (universalizability principle). Continuing‚ he states that since the laws of nature are defined to be universal‚ we can also express the categorical imperative as if our will of our rational actions would be a universal law of nature. Kant’s second imperative deals with free will and

    Premium Ethics Morality Immanuel Kant

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant argues that there is a universal moral law that every rational mind follows through reasoning. He argues moral duties are generated by the moral law‚ which he distinguishes as two types of imperatives. An imperative is a conformity with a law and he argues that a “hypothetical imperative” plays no significant role in ones moral behaviour‚ as it causes an inclination in the person‚ whereas a “categorical imperative” is innate and occurs unconditionally as one is to do so without question. Kant

    Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In deontology duty is the basis of morality (Boss 299). There are several different kinds of duties; absolute‚ prima facie‚ positive‚ and negative. An absolute duty is always morally binding while a prima facie duty is binding unless it conflicts with a more urgent moral duty (Boss 300). Positive duties require some form of an action such as giving someone money. In contrast negative duties are duties in which restraint is necessary such as cheating (Boss 300). Immanuel Kant developed his own version

    Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The following case study is a moral dilemma in which a doctor must chose a course of action with respect to patient’s case. In this case‚ the doctor must consider the morality‚ criminality‚ and ethical implications of killing‚ abortion‚ farmed organs‚ and allowing a patient suffer when there is a cure. Then and only then‚ can the doctor to determine what actions are morally permissible and allow to make an informed and proper decision as to what course of action he should take. The case study reveals

    Premium Categorical imperative Immanuel Kant Ethics

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rough Draft - Duty Ethics Duty ethics‚ also known as deontology‚ is the school of thought that bases the morality of an action on a set of universal rules. A person is said to have a duty‚ or obligation‚ to adhere to these rules with no exception. Unlike Utilitarianism‚ in deontology the morality of an action does not depend on the consequences of that action. Deontology also considers the individual rights of those affected by an action. Kant agreed that we still have moral duties to ourselves

    Premium Immanuel Kant Morality Ethics

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals‚ by Immanuel Kant‚ Kant proposes a very significant discussion of imperatives as expressed by what one “ought” to do. He implies this notion by providing the audience with two kinds of imperatives: categorical and hypothetical. The discussion Kant proposes is designed to formulate the expression of one’s action. By distinguishing the difference between categorical and hypothetical imperatives‚ Kant’s argues that categorical imperatives apply moral conduct

    Premium Categorical imperative Immanuel Kant Morality

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nietzsche’s views run along similar lines. Not only morals do pervade life spheres‚ but‚ they derive their normative force values with which they are associated . However‚ this values are not the “ground zero” of morality: as Schacht puts is ’[…] for Nietzsche […] all normativity is ultimately of extra-moral origin. For Nietzsche that ultimate origin – the Ur-source of all normativity – is to be found in the basic disposition he takes to be operative in all that transpires in this world‚ which he

    Premium Morality Immanuel Kant Ethics

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Outline and evaluate Kants categorical imperative (25 marks) Kant’s categorical ethics is a deontological theory of ethics‚ this means that the actions are either intrinsically right or intrinsically wrong‚ this is due to absolute law; the outcome of the situation is not important to Kant’s theory even if the outcome may be good. Kant has a deontological theory because he believes that you must stick to the moral rules and beliefs that you have no matter what the turn out. An example of this would

    Premium Immanuel Kant Philosophy Categorical imperative

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Final word count: 1597 A. THE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE For this case‚ I will be using Kantian ethics to pinpoint the rationally correct action to take. Before discussing Kantian ethics in relation to the case‚ we must first explore what Kantian ethics is. Kantian ethics comes from the deontological school of thought‚ which focuses on the moral correctness of the act in itself (Johnson‚ 2013). This means that the judgment on the act is done a priori. This is contrasted to the consequentialist school

    Premium Immanuel Kant Philosophy Categorical imperative

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 23