Q1. What is the dual-court system? Why do we have a dual court system? A. The dual-court system is the result of a general a agreement among the nation’s founders about the need for individual states to retain significant legislative authority and judicial autonomy separate from federal control. The reason why we have a dual-court system is‚ back then; new states joining the union were assured of limited federal intervention into local affairs. The state legislatures were free
Premium Criminal justice Crime Evidence law
may not know how to diagnose the problem when a motorcycle breakdown happens. In most cases‚ riders may seek nearest shop to repair it. b. The idea of mechanics are not the 1.3 General Objective The objective of this research is to develop an expert system for Android phones that will be used to diagnose motorcycle problems step by step. 1.3.1 Specific Objective The specific objectives of the study are the following: a. To capture the expertise of a motorcycle mechanic in diagnosing motorcycle
Premium Internal combustion engine Expert system Expert
Language | Describes something as something else. | She was a fox. | Generalisation | Broad statements inferred from specific cases | "This was poor behaviour was modelled by parents…" | Statistics and Expert Opinion | Material used to support an argument: * Facts and stats * Expert testimony * Research findings * Anecdotal effects | "The cities 1.5 million dollar debt…." | Inclusive Language | Use of personal pronouns to involve or exclude groups | "we all have a role to play…" |
Premium Logic Democracy Rights
Development of Skills Within the group‚ a large amount of skills were used. The majority of the group used listening skills‚ closed and open questioning skills. Opportunities were available where Probing and reflecting could have been put to practise. Other members of the group displayed passive aggressive behaviours ‚ dictated‚ used aggressive and bullying body / verbal language and actions. In my opinion the members of the group displaying these undesirable traits were not aware they were doing
Premium Consumer protection Expert witness
To: NHS Litigation Authority‚ Re: Chandler Bing v Friends Health NHS Foundation Trust Dear Sir/ Madam‚ Thank you for your referral of the case concerning Mr. Chandler Bing’s missed fracture scaphoid bone received on 31 August 2010. The following is the Letter of Advice to the NHSLA concerning the above-mentioned case. The Claimant: 1. The Claimant was born on 8 April 1969. As a result of the events referred to in their particulars of claim the claimant is now represented by Bloomingdale
Premium National Health Service Expert witness Tort
courtroom‚ describing what they perceived happened during the specific incident under investigation. Ideally this recollection of events is detailed; however this is not always the case. This recollection is used as evidence to show what happened from a witness ’ point of view. Memory recall has been considered a credible source in the past‚ but has recently come under attack as forensics can now support psychologists in their claim that memories and individual perceptions are unreliable; being easily manipulated
Premium Memory Testimony Witness
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL CRITERION SPECIFICITY AND STATISTICAL EVIDENCE OF DISCRIMINATION H. W. Hennessey Jr. and H. John Bernardin Plaintiffs’ expert witnesses in EEO cases involving performance appraisals often claim that adverse impact is a result of the type of rating format used. Their theory is that more specific rating criteria will lead to lessened adverse impact. We tested that theory by comparing data from a simple category-based rating system against data from
Premium Discrimination Expert witness Performance appraisal
when Sir Edward Coke suggested that madmen ‘did not know what they did’ and could not be legally charged and convicted as a criminal. The earliest documented case where a psychologist testified in court as an expert witness was in Germany 1896. Albert von Schrenck-Notzing was the expert witness in the appeal of a man charged and convicted of the deaths of three women. Albert von Schrenck-Notzing testified that due to all the
Premium Psychology Psychiatry Expert witness
EOutline and Evaluate Factors Influencing Eye Witness Testimony The term ‘eye witness testimony’ refers to an area of research into the accuracy of memory concerning significant events‚ it is legally considered to be a reliable account of events. However‚ research into eye witness testimony has found that it can be affected by many psychological factors such as‚ anxiety and stress‚ reconstructive memory‚ selective attention and leading questions. Anxiety and stress can be associated with many
Premium Witness Testimony
Examine the role of expert and lay knowledge in understanding and managing risk. Contents Page Introduction 3 Risk 3-4 What is risk? How do we understand risk? How do we manage risk? Expert Knowledge 4-5 What is it? Advantages of expert knowledge Disadvantage of expert knowledge Lay Knowledge 5-6 What is it? Advantages of lay knowledge Disadvantages of lay knowledge Beck’s Theory of a Risk society 6 Case Study:
Premium Scientific method Risk management Expert