Roman Almalbis Spouses Felix Chingkoe and Rosita Chingkoe (Petitioner) vs. Spouses Faustino Chingkoe and Gloria Chingkoe (Respondents) G.R. No. 185518 April 17‚ 2013 Facts: Respondents are registered owners of real property. They permitted petitioners to inhabit the subject property. Through the intercession of their mother‚ Faustino agreed to sell his property to Felix‚ on condition that the title shall be delivered only after payment of the full purchase price. They agreed that the incomplete
Free Property Property law Real estate
CIR vs PAL FACTS: PHILIPPINE AIRLINES‚ INC. had zero taxable income for 2000 but would have been liable for Minimum Corporate Income Tax based on its gross income. However‚ PHILIPPINE AIRLINES‚ INC. did not pay the Minimum Corporate Income Tax using as basis its franchise which exempts it from “all other taxes” upon payment of whichever is lower of either (a) the basic corporate income tax based on the net taxable income or (b) a franchise tax of 2%. ISSUE: Is PAL liable for Minimum Corporate Income
Premium Taxation in the United States Tax
Akamai Case Digest 1. Why did Akamai charge content providers and subsidize ISPs? Akamai Technology operated the content delivery network. Its first service‚ FreeFlow‚ facilitated the delivery of bandwidth-intensive page elements. A content provider could tag the object that it wanted to serve over the Akamai network. After tagging‚ websites could be over 10 times faster and be protected against sudden traffic bursts. FreeFlow could reduce the content providers’ payments to ISPs for bandwidth
Premium Mixed economy Public transport
WEEK 9 – Agency distinguished from Sale (Art. 1458) Andres Quiroga vs Parsons Hardware Co. 38 Phil. 501 G.R. No. L-11491 Subject: Sales Doctrine: Contract of Agency to Sell vs Contract of Sale Facts: On Jan 24‚ 1911‚ plaintiff and the respondent entered into a contract making the latter an “agent” of the former. The contract stipulates that Don Andres Quiroga‚ here in petitioner‚ grants exclusive rights to sell his beds in the Visayan region to J. Parsons. The contract only stipulates that
Premium Contract Pleading Complaint
Case Digest PALE Soliman M. Santos‚ Jr. v. Atty. Francisco R. Llamas A.C. No. 4749 January 20‚ 2000 Misrepresentation and Non-payment of IBP Dues November 10‚ 2010 Facts: Complaint for misrepresentation and non-payment of bar membership dues. It appears that Atty. Llamas‚ who for a number of years now‚ has not indicated the proper PTR and IBP OR Nos. and data in his pleadings. If at all‚ he only indicated “IBP Rizal 259060” but he has been using this for at least 3 years already. On the
Premium Lawyer Law
DOLORES B. GUICO‚ ET AL.‚ plaintiffs and appellants vs. PABLO G. BAUTISTA‚ ET. AL.‚ defendants and appellees. Facts: • The petitioner in this case filed a case of partition despite the existence of debts of the decedent. Issue: The petitioner urges that their action for partition and liquidation may be maintained‚ notwithstanding that there are pending obligations of the estate‚ subject to the taking of adequate measures either for the payment or the security of its creditors. Is
Free Property Property law Inheritance
EASTERN SHIPPING LINES‚ INC.‚ vs. POEA (166 SCRA 533‚ G.R. No. 76633‚ October 18‚ 1988) FACTS: In this case‚ there was a certain Vitaliano Saco was Chief Officer of the M/V Eastern Polaris when he was killed in an accident in Tokyo‚ Japan on March 15‚ 1985. His widow sued for damages under Executive Order No. 797 and Memorandum Circular No. 2 of the POEA. The petitioner‚ as owner of the vessel‚ argued that the complaint was cognizable not by the POEA but by the Social Security System and should
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Pleading Appellate court
Google: Case Digest What is the nature of network effects in paid search markets? Do you expect Google to sustain its present domination in this market? The paid search market is a two-sided market where the advertisers form the “money” side and the end users who are searching the information form the “subsidy” side. The paid search listings are essentially “context” based advertisements that appear either adjacent to the search results or are interspersed with the search results. Advertisers
Premium Web search engine Advertising Bing
OBLICON: EXTINGUISHMENT OF OBLIGATIONs Payment or Performance 1. Montecillo vs. Reynes FACTS: Respondents Ignacia Reynes and Spouses Abucay filed on June 20‚ 1984 a complaint for Declaration of Nullity and Quieting of Title against petitioner Rido Montecillo. Reynes asserted that she is the owner of a lot situated in Mabolo‚ Cebu City containing an area of 448 square meters. In 1981‚ Reynes sold 185 square meters of the Mabolo Lot to the Abucay Spouses who built a residential house on the lot they
Premium Contract Appellate court
G.R. No. L-31455 February 28‚ 1985 FILIPINAS ENGINEERING AND MACHINE SHOP‚ Petitioner‚ vs. HON. JAIME N. FERRER‚ LINO PATAJO et. Al. Cuevas J. FACTS: In preparation for the national elections of November 11‚ 1969‚ then respondent Commissioners of the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) issued an INVITATION TO BID CALL No. 127 on September 16‚ 1969 calling for the submission of sealed proposals for the manufacture and delivery of 1 1‚000 units of voting booths. Among the seventeen bidders who submitted
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Elections Contract