CASE DIGEST CASE #1: Kuroda v. Jalandoni 83 Phil 171 • FACTS: - Shigenori Kuroda‚ former Lieutenant-General of the Japanese Imperial Forces of the Philippines‚ was charged before a Military Commission in violation of the laws and customs of war. The Petitioner seeks to establish the illegality of Executive Order No. 68 of the President of the Philippines; to enjoin and prohibit two US prosecutors from participating in the prosecution of the petitioner’s case; and to permanently
Premium Law Human rights United States Constitution
GUANZON‚ Aldrin James L. PA 122 REGALA‚ Marc Daniel d. J. Hilda G. Diokno Lademora‚ Carl C. vs. CSC‚ Feb‚ 05‚ 2007 Facts: On February 3‚ 2006 petitioner‚ the duly elected Mayor of San Francisco‚ Agusan Del Sur‚ filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the invalidation of the approval of the temporary appointment of Daligdig with the CSC-CARAGA‚ where the case contains the following relevant portions: a) On July 5‚ 2005 Mayor Lademora appointed‚ Gil A. Daligdig as Municipal
Premium Municipality Mexico City Local government
G.R. No. L-42091 November 2‚ 1935 GONZALO CHUA GUAN‚ plaintiff-appellant‚ vs. SAMAHANG MAGSASAKA‚ INC.‚ and SIMPLICIO OCAMPO‚ ADRIANO G. SOTTO‚ and EMILIO VERGARA‚ as president‚ secretary and treasurer respectively of the same‚ defendants-appellees. Facts: 1. Gonzalo Toco‚ the owner of the 5‚894 shares of capital stock mortgaged these shares to Chua Chiu to guarantee the payment of debt of 20‚000. -These shares were represented by 9 certificates; having a par value of P5 per share
Premium Mortgage Debt Stock
1. Ladera v. Hodges G.R. No. 8027-R‚ September 23‚ 1952‚ Vol. 48‚ No. 12‚ Official Gazette 5374Reyes‚J.B.L.‚ J. FACTS: Paz G. Ladera entered into a contract with C.N. Hodges. Hodges promised to sell a lot with an area of 278square meters to Ladera‚ subject to certain terms and conditions. The agreement called for a downpayment of P 800.00 and monthly installments of P 5.00 each with interest of 1% per month‚ until P2‚085 is paid in full. Incase of failure of the purchaser to make any monthly
Premium Real property Property Personal property
Thornton vs. Thornton‚ G.R. No. 154598 August 16‚ 2004‚ J. Corona Facts: Petitioner‚ an American‚ and respondent‚ a Filipino‚ were married in Manila. A year later‚ respondent gave birth to a baby girl. However‚ after three years‚ respondent grew restless and bored as a plain housewife. She wanted to return to her old job as a "guest relations officer" in a nightclub‚ with the freedom to go out with her friends. Whenever petitioner was out of the country‚ respondent was also often out with her friends
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Habeas corpus Court
Art. 1544- Double Sale G.R. No. L-19248 7 SCRA 452 February 28‚ 1963 ILUMINADO HANOPOL vs. PERFECTO PILAPIL‚ BARRERA‚ J.: Case Nature : APPEAL from a decision of the Court of First instance of Leyte. Facts: Hanopol claims ownership of the land by virtue of a series of purchases effected in 1938 by means of private instruments‚ executed by the former owners surnamed Siapo. Additionally‚ he invokes in his favor a decision by the CFI of Leyte (in Civil Case No. 412) rendered
Premium Property Appellate court Appeal
♥ ILOVEYOU ♥ Oria Vs McMicking Source: www.lawphil.net Art. 1387. All contracts by virtue of which the debtor alienates property by gratuitous title are presumed to have been entered into in fraud of creditors‚ when the donor did not reserve sufficient property to pay all debts contracted before the donation. FACTS Gutierrez Hermanos filed an action for recovery of a sum of money against Oria Hermanos & Co. and herein plaintiff filed an action for recovery also for the same defendant
Premium Contract Supreme Court of the United States Plaintiff
Cyruz P. Tuppal 2011-0134 Case Title: STARLITE VS NLRC G.R. No.: G.R. No. 78491 Date: March 16‚ 1989 Petitioner: Starlite Plastic Industrial Corporation Respondent: National Labor Relations Commission and Edgar Gomez Ponente: J. Cortes Facts: Private respondent GOMEZ was employed as a factory worker by STARLITE sometime in March 1981. On 22 June 1984‚ STARLITE dismissed him on the ground that he was caught attempting to steal one ballast costing P80.00. STARLITE reported
Premium Employment 1984 Prima facie
Dy Keh Beng -vs- International Labor and Maritime Union of the Philippines‚ et al. GR No. L-32245‚ 25 May 1979 FACTS A charge for ULP was filed against Dy Keh beng for discriminatory acts within the meaning of RA 875‚ Section 4(a.1) and 4(a.2) by dismissing Carlos N. Solano and Ricardo Tudla for their union activities. A case was filed in court and Dy Keh Beng contended that he did not know Tudla and that Solano was not his employee because the latter came to the establishment only when there
Premium Existence The Establishment Ontology
AGENCY‚ PARTNERSHIP AND TRUSTS DIGESTS (2013 – 2014) ATTY. JOAQUIN OBIETA G.R. No. L-45441 MORA ELECTRIC CO. vs. MATIC June 26‚ 1939 J.: Petitioner: Mora Electric Co.‚ Inc. Respondents: Paulino Matic and Benita Quiogue Vda. Del Rosario ISSUE: FACTS: Matic obtained from Manila City a concession to provide the lighting system of Manila cemeteries on All Souls’ Day of 1934. The amount was P8‚773 to be guaranteed by Luzon Surety Co. Matic then authorized Quiogue to contract with Mora
Free Manila Metro Manila Quezon City