said promotion and in case of dismissal of his representation‚ he could approach the Service Tribunal---Writ of quo warranto‚ otherwise could not be issued as petitioner himself was party---Writ of quo warranto was not maintainable if it was filed by an interested person or who was affected‚ himself by impugned order. (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)-- ----Arts. 199 & 212---Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973)‚ S.4--
Premium Pakistan Punjab Lahore
Assignment brief – QCF BTEC Assignment front sheet Qualification Unit number and title BTEC BND Level 3 Extended Diploma in Business Unit 14 – Aspects of Employment Law Learner name Assessor name Stephen Acquah Date issued Hand in deadline Submitted on Assignment title Assignment 3 – The employer/employee relationship and welfare In this assessment you will have opportunities to provide evidence against the following criteria. Indicate the page numbers where the evidence can be found.
Premium Employment Trade union Law
The New York Convention at Age 50: A Primer on the International Regime for Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards By Stephanie Cohen The United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the “New York Convention” or the “Convention”)1 is a strong incentive to choose arbitration as a means of international dispute resolution. The Convention eliminates some of the uncertainties of transnational business by providing a uniform legal framework for the enforcement
Free Arbitration
TRIBUNALS – Discuss the factor leading to the growth of administrative tribunals and state what are the advantages of administrative tribunals as compared to the system of ordinary courts. In pursuance of administrative law‚ there can arise disputes. These disputes require adjudication. There are administrative agencies other than courts to adjudicate such issues arising in the course of day to day administration. It is more familiar called as administrative tribunals. An administrative tribunal
Premium Court Administrative law Judge
WHAT IS TRIBUNAL ? Tribunal is a board established under the law to adjudicate in a certain matter such as claims by an individual. In Malaysia‚ there is the Tribunal for consumer claims. The Tribunal for consumer claims is established under Part XII of the Consumer Protection Act 1999. It is an independent body and its primary function is to hear and determine claims lodged by consumers for losses suffered in respect of any goods or services acquired. It provides a speedy manner for the settlement
Premium God Islam Religion
act provides for the following authorities for Investigation and Settlement of industrial disputes: (i) Works Committee (ii) Conciliation Officer (iii) Boards of Conciliation (iv) Court of Inquiry (v) Labour Court (vi) Labour Tribunals (vii) National Tribunals Let us discuss these authorities in detail: WORKS COMMITTEE (Section 3): The works committee is a committee consisting of representatives of employers and workmen (section3). The works committee is a forum for explaining the difficulties
Premium Dispute resolution Court Judge
lock-outs d. Relief to workmen in matters of lay-off‚ retrenchment and closure e. Collective bargaining f. Setting up of authorities such as Works Committee‚ Conciliation Officers‚ Board of Conciliation‚ Courts of Enquiry‚ Labour Courts and Tribunals etc. are provided for settlement of industrial disputes and enduring industrial peace Important Terminologies • • • • • • Appropriate Government: Sec 2(a) of the I.D Act defines Industries carried on by or under the authority of the Central
Premium Trade union Court Employment
Table of Cases Balgobin v Toer Hamlets 1987 Broadbent v Crisp (1974) (Nairns p105) Burton and Rhule v de Vere Hotels [1996] (Nairns p 63) De Souza v AA (1986)). Jones v Tower Boot co. 1997 Lincolnshire Police v Stubbs [1999] IRLR 81‚ EAT Livesey v Parker Merchanting Ltd Mrs Rea Moonsar v Fiveways Express Transport Ltd (2004) Porcelli v Strathclyde Regional Council (1984) Waters v Commissioner of the Metropolis (1997) Whitttaker v Minister Pensions and National
Premium Employment Vicarious liability Harassment
...................................................1 Craig v The State of South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 at 179.....................11 Ridge v Baldwin (1961) 2 All E.R. 523: (1961) 2 WLR 1054………………….6 R. V. Northumberland Compensation Appeal Tribunal‚ ex P. Shaw (1951) 1 K.B. 711: (1952) 1 K.B. 338…………………………………………………...13 Saluwa v Kabir (2011) 1 NWLR (pt. 1232) 417..................................................9 Table of Contents WHAT DID ANISMINIC DEDIDE? ANISMINIC LTD V FOREIGN
Premium Court Judge Jury