The University of Nottingham Faculty of Engineering School of Electrical and Electronics Engineering Project Title Supercapacitor/Battery hybrid system for DC motor control pulsed power circuits: Demonstration of Elapsed TIME using Airborne Remote Controlled Helicopters AUTHOR LEE HONG WEE MODERATOR DR. KENNETH ANG SUPERVISOR PROF. SRS PRABAHARAN DATE April 18‚ 2011 Third year project proposal submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Bachelor
Premium Capacitor
Case 4: Takamatsu Case Analysis (25 points) Executive Summary Takamatsu Sports Enterprise is a sporting company that has recently experienced a considerably large loss in net profit. Mr. Takamatsu has begun to look into the problem of the company and believes that Ms. Ota is the problem in the loss of sales. Although Mr. Takamatsu thinks that Ms. Ota is the problem‚ it really is Mr. Fujita. He has inefficient training and sales. If Mr. Takamatsu gets Mr. Fujita the appropriate training‚ he can
Premium Sales Marketing Selling
position to carter to this increase in order in the future‚ they are in for a heavy loss and as a result they might even consider an employee redundancy plan also. After this meeting trade unions requested some conditions also. Problem Statement In this case we can identify several Management issues which influenced for the smooth functioning of the company. Those issues as follows; Issue 1 Organization decided to increase their production and implement an incentive program for employees who had produce
Premium Motivation Performance appraisal Management
International Business - Foreign Trade M/S Taneja Exports‚ Mumbai Introduction Mr. Gurmeet Taneja and Mr. Rahul Khatri are partners of M/S Taneja exports‚ Mumbai. Both of them qualified from IIFT‚ New Delhi in the year 2002. They declined lucrative corporate job offers‚ since they have decided to plunge into the world of international business. M/S Taneja Exports is registered as a partnership firm‚ with Mr. Gurmeet Taneja and Mr.Rahul Khatri sharing the profits in the ratio of
Premium International trade Export Cheque
Issue The challenge in this case is to make a decision whether the book written by David is legitimately legal does not against the copyright of earlier published articles‚ or it is classified as an infringement work that copy the existed paper. Rules This particular case concerns about intellectual property law that emphasize on copyright law protection. Copyright is the exclusive rights to protect the original work from copied by the other people. The law of copyright does protect the expression
Premium Property Copyright Intellectual property
AUD610 SUMMARY OF CASE “ENRON” Prepared for: DR NOOR MARINI Prepared by: AFNANIN BT ABD AZIZ 2012212966 NOR IDAYU BT ISA 2012485132 SITI NORFAZILAH BT HAMIRUDDIN 2012670652 NOOR PARIHA AMIN NUDIN 2012660688 NURFARAHANIM BT MOHD SABRI 2009449842 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Without the assistance‚ cooperation and guidance of several parties‚ this assignment would not be achievable. We
Premium Positive psychology Collaboration Malaysia
unintentionally hurt another person is liable for the harm through intentional harm. Holdings: the jury rendered a verdict for the plaintiff of $2800. Rationale: the touch was the exciting or remote cause of the destruction of the bone. The case was a case of torts and it related to the assult and battery which the defendant should pay money for the plaintiff. The defendant has no proof of any other hurt‚ and the medical testimony seems to have been agreed that this touch or kick was
Premium Contract
ANALYZING A CASE STUDY STAGE 1: QUICKLY GO THROUGH THE GENERAL SCENARIO PRESENTED TO GAIN A GENERAL UNDERSTANDING OF THE SITUATION. Underline/highlight information which may indicate problems exist STAGE 2: EXAMINE THE QUESTIONS CAREFULLY Read the questions several times-work out what is asking of you STAGE 3: READ THE CASE AGAIN VERY THOROUGHLY Look for evidence STAGE 4: PLAN YOUR ANSWER-SOME GUIDELINES You must be able to cite evidence (s) to support your arguments Apply
Premium Decision making Decision theory Decision making software
in her contention that nephews and nieces alone do not inherit by right of representation unless concurring with brothers or sisters of the deceased‚ as provided expressly by Art. 975. Nevertheless‚ the trial court was correct when it held that‚ in case of intestacy‚ nephews and nieces exclude all
Premium Inheritance Marriage
the Texas State Court of Appeals who rejected the argument. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals took up the case and affirmed the same judgment. Issue: Was the petitioner’s Fifth Amendment right violated when prosecutor’s used his silence as evidence of guilt‚ when he was not in custody and had not had his Miranda rights read to him? Holding/Rule: No‚ because the petitioner did not express that he wanted to invoke his privilege to stay silent‚ and not testify. Reasoning: Neither of the two
Premium Question Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution Crime