Is Stem Cell Research Ethical? Essay Example
Ethics Behind Stem Cell Research.
Is Stem Cell Research ethical? Yes, it is. An embryo which is four or five days old, from which stem cells are derived, is not a human being yet, because it’s brain is nonfunctional and it’s heart is not beating. So destroying it would not be murder, it’s just a beginning of a long process of obtaining stem cells from it. Ronald Reagan, The Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Christopher Reeve, Michael J. Fox and various writers and reporters for scientific magazines and newspapers have declared Embryonic Stem cell Research ethical. With support and funding, Embryonic Stem Cell Research will help cure a variety of diseases that are now considered incurable.
Whether or not stem cell research is ethical is a very controversial issue, especially today in science and politics. A lot of people argue that it is ethical and that will help save millions of lives. Others argue against it, justifying their beliefs, by saying that innocent lives of future fetuses are destroyed. Embryonic Stem Cell research is the most efficient way of finding cures for various diseases. Opponents of Embryonic stem cell research suggest that scientists use adult stem cells instead. However, embryonic stem cells have a much greater developmental potential than adult stem cells. Embryonic stem cells are pluripotent, meaning they have developmental plasticity, whereas adult stem cells are multipotent, which means that they can give rise to cells only within their own category. Embryonic stem cells are cells that are very likely to develop into a great number of cell types in the body by scientists’ manipulation. These cells can theoretically divide to replace other cells as long as an organism is still alive. When each cell divides, it can either remain a stem cell for further research, or it can become a specialized cell such as a “muscle cell, a red blood cell, or a brain cell, according to the National
Is Stem Cell Research ethical? Yes, it is. An embryo which is four or five days old, from which stem cells are derived, is not a human being yet, because it’s brain is nonfunctional and it’s heart is not beating. So destroying it would not be murder, it’s just a beginning of a long process of obtaining stem cells from it. Ronald Reagan, The Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Christopher Reeve, Michael J. Fox and various writers and reporters for scientific magazines and newspapers have declared Embryonic Stem cell Research ethical. With support and funding, Embryonic Stem Cell Research will help cure a variety of diseases that are now considered incurable.
Whether or not stem cell research is ethical is a very controversial issue, especially today in science and politics. A lot of people argue that it is ethical and that will help save millions of lives. Others argue against it, justifying their beliefs, by saying that innocent lives of future fetuses are destroyed. Embryonic Stem Cell research is the most efficient way of finding cures for various diseases. Opponents of Embryonic stem cell research suggest that scientists use adult stem cells instead. However, embryonic stem cells have a much greater developmental potential than adult stem cells. Embryonic stem cells are pluripotent, meaning they have developmental plasticity, whereas adult stem cells are multipotent, which means that they can give rise to cells only within their own category. Embryonic stem cells are cells that are very likely to develop into a great number of cell types in the body by scientists’ manipulation. These cells can theoretically divide to replace other cells as long as an organism is still alive. When each cell divides, it can either remain a stem cell for further research, or it can become a specialized cell such as a “muscle cell, a red blood cell, or a brain cell, according to the National