Gun Control Research Paper Essay Example
“Gun control” is a phrase that means different things to different people. It has been a serious topic of debate that this author now intends to prove as being right or wrong. There is no in-between on this issue. Both sides have received adequate attention and will be treated in an objective manner. For all the attention that gun control has received, there are two basic opinions that are to be discussed. To its proponents, gun control means prevention of crime. This, they say, should lead to peace. Charles Krauthammer wrote about this in “The
Washington Post” in an article titled “Disarm The People.” He wrote, “…a civilized society must disarm its citizenry if it is to have a modicum of domestic tranquility…”
Pro-gun activists, on the other hand, see gun-control as a threat not only to their self-defense, but also to their Second Amendment right. In an issue of American Survival
Guide, Howard J. Fezell wrote an essay: “Your Individual Right to Keep and Bear
Arms,” during which he made plain this fact: gun-prohibitionists have completely ignored numerous rulings of the Supreme Court in which the Supreme Court has stated the Second Amendment as an individual right, not a collective right. Also, they believe it to be a failed experiment. This is obvious in a statement by David Lampo: “The basic premise of the gun control movement, that easy access to guns causes higher crime, is contradicted by the facts, by history and by reason.” According to statistics, gun bans - the ultimate goal of gun control activists - has failed completely. Gun control activists make their claims that gun control is a good idea because it has succeeded in other places, two of which we shall now examine. Britain has become a country where it is nearly impossible for a law-abiding citizen to obtain a firearm. Gun control has succeeded there -- or has it? Examining the crime in Britain, statistics show that since the banning of guns in 1997, crime has risen
Washington Post” in an article titled “Disarm The People.” He wrote, “…a civilized society must disarm its citizenry if it is to have a modicum of domestic tranquility…”
Pro-gun activists, on the other hand, see gun-control as a threat not only to their self-defense, but also to their Second Amendment right. In an issue of American Survival
Guide, Howard J. Fezell wrote an essay: “Your Individual Right to Keep and Bear
Arms,” during which he made plain this fact: gun-prohibitionists have completely ignored numerous rulings of the Supreme Court in which the Supreme Court has stated the Second Amendment as an individual right, not a collective right. Also, they believe it to be a failed experiment. This is obvious in a statement by David Lampo: “The basic premise of the gun control movement, that easy access to guns causes higher crime, is contradicted by the facts, by history and by reason.” According to statistics, gun bans - the ultimate goal of gun control activists - has failed completely. Gun control activists make their claims that gun control is a good idea because it has succeeded in other places, two of which we shall now examine. Britain has become a country where it is nearly impossible for a law-abiding citizen to obtain a firearm. Gun control has succeeded there -- or has it? Examining the crime in Britain, statistics show that since the banning of guns in 1997, crime has risen