Preview

Libertarian View On Gun Control

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1203 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Libertarian View On Gun Control
The Libertarian’s View on Gun Control The debate over the restrictions of gun control is centered on the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which gives people the right to bear arms. Gun control supporters believe that this explicit right does not extend to ownership of military-style firearms. For example, groups like the National Rifle Association argue that gun control infringes on the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. Gun control is an on-going debate because each year more people are killed by the use of guns. However, guns are not the result in the number of homicides each year, the problems rests with the irresponsible gun users. Gun Control would do nothing but harm America because guns offer protection and security …show more content…
In particular, we want to see all Americans, including gun owners, treated equally under the law, as our Constitution requires (Neale). As Libertarians, we believe that Americans have the right to decide how they want to protect their property, their families, and themsleves. Gun ownership, does not harm people and cannot justify criminal penalties. A man with a gun in his own home is not a threat to anyone unless someone is breaking into the man’s house. Guns are not the problem, they are inanimate objects. The responsibility belongs with the owner and user of the gun. Rather than banning guns, the Libertarian Party encourages gun ownership, as well as education and training programs …show more content…
A few hours later, Jesus and his disciples were approached by Roman soldiers, and Peter drew his sword and cut off a soldier’s ear. Jesus responded in John 18:11 (ESV) by commanding Peter, “Put your sword away! Shall I not drink the cup the Father has given me (Holy Bible)?” Even though, Christ told Peter to put his sword away, however, He did not say get rid of it because that would have contradicted what He had told his disciples earlier. Jesus recognizes that a weapon is not responsible for a crime, but that the user is responsible for a crime committed. Christ makes the point that Peter’s sword should be used to protect his own life from danger, and that it was not needed to protect the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Over the last several years there has been an ongoing debate on how to interpret the Second Amendment and whether or not we should have gun control. With the Second Amendment specifically grants that "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." The controversy of it being that in the Second Amendment doesn't specify who "the people" are. This being said it leaves room for the legislative bodies and court to pass laws and interpretations that influence the way this Amendment is applied and enforced.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The role guns play in our society has long been a controversial topic for the past few years in the united states. There are those who believe that guns do not belong in the hands of citizens and there are those who believe that guns are the foundation that protects our rights and liberties stated in the Constitution. There are too many leading factors as to why there should not be any stricter gun control laws. Some of these factors are that they go against our fundamental rights of self defense, give too much power to the government, and could potentially increase crime rates in the united states.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control advocates focus on the serious negative effects on gun availability on safety, while gun ownership advocates emphasize the lawful use of guns and their place in our history and culture. While our history and culture is important we need to address the current national problem in order to live in a safe enough society. In an effort to stabilize and decrease firearm related injuries and deaths in the U.S. a strong federal law to control guns is needed. In the bigger picture, we people will see the United States, as a Nation, as a better safer place to live in and not to die…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Good Or Bad

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page

    Gun Control is a contentious topic for American domestic policy, individuals along party lines have become entrenched in a great debate over the merits of the second amendment. Historically, the United States has allowed individuals the right to bear arms given the revolutionary heritage of this great nation, however, in some instances this right has been denied to the detriment of society. Contemporary statistics affirm that individuals are safer when they are armed. Although, gun control advocates argue the less weaponry the safer a society. Biblically, God had no qualms about men owning means of self preservation. Gun Control, while not only unconstitutional, denies well meaning Americans the right to defend themselves from outside threats.…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For the last couple of years, gun control has continued to be a huge controversial debate in Congress. This argument over whether gun control laws should be strict is nothing new to the world of politics. The ideas of gun control consist of laws that either keep away firearms from people, or allow one to keep guns for personal protection. They also control who the guns are being sold to and who can own them. In America, each state government has passed many gun control laws. Many people think that gun control is right because they think keeping people away from guns will reduce the amount of deaths each year. They also think that guns cause many of the deaths that had been committed each year. Whenever people hear the word gun, the thoughts…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The problem that splits gun control proponents from their opposition is the language of the second amendment of the constitution. The founding fathers of this nation believed that, “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” (U.S. Constitution). This multifaceted sentence from the Bill of Rights brings many quarrels to life with its simple diction. It is very open to interpretation, which is what causes both sides of the debate to have “legal stances” on the matter. The National Rifle Association (NRA), which is the nation’s largest gun advocacy organization, is led by the philosophy that it, “[hosts] a wide range of firearms-related public interest activities of the National Rifle Association of America and other organizations that defend and foster the Second Amendment rights of all law-abiding Americans.” What gun advocates in the NRA often fail to understand, however, is the conscionable limits to the Second Amendment. As 27-year serving Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia stated in the majority opinion of the District of Columbia V. Heller decision, “like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited” (Scalia). This lead Scalia to also state that, “it is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.” These sanctions are legal proof that the second amendment allows for the government to regulate the distribution, ownership, and use of weapons. On top of that, Scalia, regarded as the most conservative justice, clearly highlights that gun control is useful and at times…

    • 1687 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment states, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Proponents of more gun control interpret it as being meant for the militia and that the gun laws should be stricter for the average American citizen or ban guns altogether. However, opponents of more gun control believe that the amendment is protecting an individual’s rights right to own guns and protect themselves. However, gun control laws do not deter crime; gun ownership deters crime. Guns will still exist even if it’s not legal for civilians to own them because there is always a way for criminals to get a hold of them, it has been proven in history, and don’t prevent gun related deaths.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a big controversy about whether or not to have control over guns. One side of the controversy is that no citizen is allowed to have a gun in the house hold, only allowing the Army, Cops, and anyone with that power over the country. You also have the other side that the citizens are on, where many of the citizens use firearms for hunting, safety, and many other things. How could we take away firearms when so many people have and use them, “In the United States every 100 people 88.8% have firearms.” (ProCon.org “Gun Control ProCon.org”,1) The main reason the government is thinking to have gun control, is to decrease the lives that are getting taken away by these powerful tools that we use to have fun. Many people…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pro-gun advocates see gun control laws as only a way for the government to control its citizens. For the debate of both side will comes down to who should own a gun and under what restrictions should they be able to possess it? Guns control is an important question either we should put a law to it or not. Everyone involved in the issue, and extremely important to society. Guns play a role in everyone’s life. Whether it be your own personal possession or someone else possession. We as Americans value our rights to freedoms and we were granted by our founding fathers, which includes the possession of firearms in the Second Amendment. As citizens we must know that there are many guns violence happened in our society. It needs to stop as soon as possible so innocent people will not die.In conclusion, every citizens has the right to speech up for everything that they did not feel right. I personally think gun causes problem because of gun can lead to serious violence and dangerous to our society. It is important that we pay close attention to guns control law to see how it will have a great impact on our lives. Do gun control laws help or hurt the people the citizens they are trying to protect? I think it helps innocent people because we never know who the bad guy is and who the good guy is to sell the gun…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Paper

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Gun control is a very large problem going on in the United States today. All guns have the potential to be dangerous and should be used with precautions, as well as the right safety regulations. Guns can be hazardous and tragic accidents can happen, like the Sandy Hook shooting in Connecticut, but only if they are in the hands of the wrong person. Guns are not only used every day for protection, such as law enforcement like the military and the police, but guns are also used for recreational activities such as hunting. The second amendment states that we have the right to bear arms, which also means we have the right to own a gun to protect ourselves and our families not only from criminals, but also from the government. So therefore the prohibition of guns or stricter laws on gun control is unconstitutional and not morally correct. I believe gun control in the United States should not necessarily be eliminated, but reduced greatly.…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control Research

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages

    One of the most controversial issues in our society is gun control regulation. Gun control refers to restrictions or limits on possession, production, importation, shipment, sale, and/or guns by private citizens. There is an extreme amount of violence associated with guns that is increasing every year. Back in history when gun control laws and the second amendment was created, they didn’t have the huge fright that Americans have today of people constantly killing other people every day. Though, some people feel that it isn’t guns that kill people, it is the peoples fault. There are many questions that arise concerning who should be able to own guns and how those guns are obtained.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Banning

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Since the school shooting in Connecticut, the debate about gun control has been the topic for discussion. The reaction all over the country is "change or repeal the Second Amendment." The Second Amendment is one of the reasons we have more guns than any country on the planet. Some people believe that banning guns will decrease the number of crimes committed in the United States because they believe guns are the roots of all crime, and banning guns will decrease the murder rates and give everyone a peace of mind. While others believe that abolishing guns would not change anything. People would still get murdered, robbers would still rob, and it would not make people feel safer, it could in fact do the opposite. Appealing the second Amendment will not sufficiently work unless the government was to go through every home and building- through peoples personal belongings- and take every gun they see. Guns are not the problem, people are. What we need is reliability from the government, stricter regulations on gun control, and better examples set.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gun Control Since the days of the pioneers of the United States, firearms have been part of the American tradition as protection and a means of hunting or sport. As we near the end of the 20th century the use of guns has changed significantly. Because of fast and steady increase in crime and the fight for the right to own a hand gun, the introduction of legislation for gun control, to try to reduce the crime in the United States, has been a hotly debated issue in recent years. Although many people feel that gun control violates the right of the people, given in the second amendment "the right to bear arms", controlling distribution and sales and the registration of guns and gun owners is necessary because of the homicide rate involving guns and the violence by criminals using guns. Many people feel that gun control violates the right of the people given in the second amendment the right "to bear arms". Opponents of gun control, including the National Rifle Association, better known as the NRA, argue that the "right To bear arms" is guaranteed in the second amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America and licensing restrictions penalize law-abiding citizens while in no way preventing criminal use of handguns. It is also argued that by making it difficult for guns to be bought and registered for the American public there is a threat to the personal safety of American families everywhere. However controlling the sale and distribution of firearms is necessary because of the homicide rate involving guns. In 1988 there were 9000 handgun related murders in America. Metropolitan centers and some suburban communities of America are setting new records for homicides by handguns. Larger Metropolitan centers have ten times the murder rate of all Western Europe. For example in Washington,D.C. there was an estimated 400 homicides including guns. In addition gun control has been seen as necessary because of the violence…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Gun control has been a controversial issue for years in the United States. Some say that with stricter gun control laws there will be less crime. Others disagree stating that there would not be less crime with stricter gun control laws, and that it is our constitutional right as Americans to keep and bear arms. But which party is correct? Too much gun control would impose on our rights as a free people and not necessarily result in the desired outcome. But if there were too little gun control and anyone could carry a gun, things also would not pan out the way that they should. Recognizing both sides, there should not be more gun control laws because they impose on our constitutional rights; they decrease the safety of our families, schools, and society; and they focus on the wrong problem which is not the guns, but the people carrying them.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Gun Control Debate

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The gun control debate has been going on for a long time in U.S history. It became very controversial after the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy, Robert Kennedy and the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. After the death of these influential men, President Lyndon B. Johnson renewed the fight for gun control. Since the time of President Lyndon B. Johnson and his movement of gun control, countless political leaders have developed their opinions on gun ownership or restrictions. So they’re two sides to the debate on gun control, one is people stating gun control laws should be enforced, while a group of people known as the gun right activists believe that gun control laws should not be enforced but rather loosened up. Gun right activists should…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays