Preview

Capacity of the Mentally Ill to Conclude Contracts Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1251 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Capacity of the Mentally Ill to Conclude Contracts Essay Example
Explain the law relating to the mentally ill to conclude contracts and consider why these rules exist.

Introduction

A contract is a legally binding agreement between two or more persons that is recognised by the courts. In order for an agreement to be legally binding there are certain criteria that have to be met. One of these criteria is capacity. The majority of us have the capacity to form a legally binding agreement, however certain categories of people are limited by law to make contracts the main categories are minors, people judged incapable of contracting due to mental disorders, drunkenness or under the influence of drugs.
The purpose of this essay is explain the law relating to the mentally ill to conclude contracts and consider why these rules exist.

Apart from persons certified insane under section three of the Mental Health Act 1983 (www.statutelaw.gov.uk) a contract with an individual person with mental illness is valid. Persons with mental illnesses are bound by contracts for necessaries and must pay a sensible price, however other contracts are voidable if (a) individual did not know what they were doing and (b) the other party was aware of this.

Persons of unsound mind

Persons certified as insane under the Mental Health act 1983 section 3 can never make a valid contract, however a mentally unbalanced person has full contractual capacity, although such an individual may be entitled to avoid a contract that has been made if they did not know what they were doing and the other party was aware that they did not know what they were doing.
In Imperial Loan co - v – Stone [1892] where a person of unsound mind was sued on a promissory note. He had signed it as a surety. The jury found that he was insane when he signed the note but there was no finding as to the creditor's knowledge of such insanity. It was held that the defendant was wrong and in order for the action to succeed the defendant has to convince the court of both issues.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Insanity Defense

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The insanity defense is one of the several legal questions that might be raised in a criminal case. This type of defense in a criminal case focuses on the defendant’s cognitive and mental state at the time of the offense. Due to this speculation, the questions focuses on whether the defendant is criminally responsible for his or her behavior due to the mental state at the time of the offense (Hugaboom, 2002). Also, additional questions are required to determine psychological evidence might also be included in the case. The psychological issues will include the defendant’s competency to stand trial, the mental conditions that are relevant in consideration of the sentencing, and competency to waive rights. According to Hugaboom (2002), insanity…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    . The husband of the plaintiff file a petition to the court that his wife[plaintiff] is mentally ill and needs to have a court order directing the admission of her to the mental health hospital. The petition initiated by plaintiff’s husband is the order of the Wayne County probate court, and it is also appropriately certified by Doctors Wolodzko, who after appearing in her house and introducing himself as a doctor , and have a conversation with her in person that day and another day in telephone, determine that she is suffering from paranoid schizophrenia and Smyk. The court gave the order and the Plaintiff was taken by ambulance from her home to a private psychiatric hospital.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eddie Routh Case Study

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Two cases with defendants who both have plead not guilty by reason of insanity, have been given two different rulings despite the fact that they both have mental illnesses. In James Holmes’ trial, Holmes killed twelve people and injured more than seventy in his local movie theater. Holmes was found not guilty by reason of insanity, but a psychiatrist claimed him to be legally sane, but had a mental illness.(Ingold and Phillips) If Holmes was ‘legally sane’ but mentally ill then he should not have been found not guilty by reason of INSANITY. In the Eddie Routh case, he was given a life sentence and had suffered severe PTSD and schizophrenia prior to the crime. (Banner) According to the Model Penal Code would not Routh's mental illness be the cause of his crime and excuse him from the sentence? The court is acting unjust, inconsistent, and illogical in their rulings to these defendants who both have records of mental illness, or claims of mental illness, but one walks into the prison at the end of the day and the other walks into the mental ward. The rules currently in action allow judges to rule based on what seems to be their unlogical personal opinion after maybe reviewing the mental illness records, maybe not, their pigheaded personality will…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Missouri in 1975. This case is brought to the Supreme Court for review in 1969 where Drope, the Petitioner, and his acquaintances are charged with assisting in a rape and kidnapping of his wife. Once indicted the petitioner files a motion in order to obtain psychiatric evaluation and further treatment; this request is quickly denied. Once on to trial, Drope does not try to deny the claim against him however; his wife attests to acts of strange behavior, anti-social behavior, and recalls an incidence in which he tried to murder her the Sunday before the trial begins. Two days into the trial Drope shoots himself and is hospitalized unable to return, the court decides to continue on the basis that his absence was on this own accord. The case was closed with a jury finding him guilty and sentenced to life in prison. Once sentenced he immediately filed an injunction asking for another trial do to the fact he was deprived of his constitutional rights after not being given a mental competency hearing prior to or during trial. This case is seen by the same judge that has just sat through the previous trial. This motion is discarded upholding the ruling of the previous court, which this verdict is held up in the Missouri Supreme Court as well. Once heard by the Supreme Court they find that there should have been a mental competency hearing ordered prior to trial due to overwhelming evidence of mental instabilities. His suicide attempt should have also caused for a hold on the trial in order for mental competency to be reviewed at that point. Petitioner’s attorney asks for a recess at the time of the shooting and is denied. The court is ordered to proceed without him there; the Supreme Court finds this to be another oppression of his constitutional rights. This is a very good example of the mental competency evaluation and the importance that it plays for patients. Some patients should be in mental rehabilitation’s but are…

    • 3102 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a reason the U.S. Supreme Court Justices tend to quote Dickens frequently in their opinions: he usually some good points about the law. When it comes to legal fees, Dickens often pontificated as to whether it was ever possible to have a fair trial when money determined the quality of representation. Two hundred years later and on the opposite side of the Atlantic, this issue is still ripe for debate because regardless of all the services available; social equality in the law does not exist - particularly when it comes to the mentally ill or disabled. This paper will discuss the ethical issues surrounding legal fees, examine the options for representation available, and touch upon how this affects the mentally ill or disabled - a group…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psy/270 Mind over Matter

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The second prong of McNaughten rule states “knowledge of right and wrong” (Gibeaut, 2006) with this rule, the individual must be able to prove that he or she was suffering from a mental illness during the act, and was not able to establish right from wrong. According to Gibeaut (2006) “a defendant who pleads insanity must prove that at the time of the offense he or she was suffering from a mental disease, so severely as not to know the nature and quality of the act” (pp.13).…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    This paper will include what the insanity statutes are in Ohio, the state that I live in. I will also talk about how often the insanity defense is used in the United States. As well as how successful this defense is. I will also discuss if psychologists should give their ultimate opinion in regards to sanity cases as well as the ethical issues that may rise from their opinions. Lastly, I will discuss how difficult it is to provide adequate psychological care for mentally ill patients while they are incarcerated in prison. The care they would have received had they been institutionalized in a mental hospital instead would have resulted in fewer deaths.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Insanity Plea

    • 705 Words
    • 1 Page

    be able to use that defense, one has to have a separate trial to determine if he or she is insane.…

    • 705 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    unit 306

    • 6693 Words
    • 23 Pages

    Mental Health Act 1983 – This is to protect the rights of people with a mental illness.…

    • 6693 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The author of this paper argues several reasons why the insanity plea should be changed or either eliminated. The reasons are considered and supported by evidence. The conclusion states that insanity should be altered or eliminated for the safety and well being of society.…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In a publication “The Essential Elements of a Mental Health Court (2007)” explains that how mental health courts are a recent and rapidly expanding phenomenon. This interpretation discusses in the late 1990s only a few courts were accepting cases of this nature. Since then numerous mental health courts have been established to examine defendant’s cases that suffer with a mental illnesses. According to the publication “The Essential Elements of a Mental Health Court (2007)” these courts emphasized their differences and their diversity is undeniable; the similarities across mental health courts share common characteristics.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Specialty courts are problem solving court systems that focus on treatment and rehabilitation as opposed to straight jail or prison time. The focus is on treating the underlying issues that led the defendants to court in the first place. The types of specialty courts in Massachusetts vary from mental health, veteran’s treatment, firearm session, and drug courts. Normally when suspects are arrested and they are arraigned in regular district courts like everyone else.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In evaluating the process, the right to self-determination and autonomy are at the center of this case. Is the right to self-determination equally weighted during times when mental capacity is compromised by severe mental illness, or is the relevancy of this not an issue? Because of the inherent risk associated with lack of capacity to both the individual and the society, it should not be equally weighted, in severe mental illness, but should factor the best option as the one that protects the patient with minimum infringement, but with the goal of restoring them to a state where they can sell determine for…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mental Health Court

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Are the mentally ill consider criminals? Are all criminals mentally ill to some extent? I wouldn’t say all but I think that it depends on the extent of the crime when comes to someone that has already been diagnosed as mentally ill. Committing a crime without actually knowing that you are doing it would be a different case for a mentally ill person. In discussing mentally ill criminals, I have to discuss mental health courts. I also feel like there should Police officers that deal directly with mental illness, they don’t understand how to deal with them.…

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    The criminal justice system ignores the mentally ill, and by not treating them differently, causes more crime and discomfort for the citizens of the United States. The term mentally ill is defined by “any of various psychiatric disorders or diseases, usually characterized by impairment of thought, mood, or behavior” (mental illness). Although there are many disorders and diseases that can fit into this definition, schizophrenia is the most significant. The focus then should be on people who have schizophrenia since “schizophrenia is the most persistent and disabling of the major mental illnesses” (World fellowship). What makes schizophrenics individuals in more need of being targeted by the criminal justice system than others is the symptom anosognosia. Anosognosia is when a person does not believe they are ill, therefore, to their understanding, any medication, especially if there is a side effect, is unnecessary (Anosognia- Fast Facts). A patient with depression can understand they need to take the medication the doctor prescribed to get better, a patient with schizophrenia and anosognia will not be able to connect that logic. Without the medication to control mental diseases, people with mental illnesses are more prone to enter the criminal justice system and use up resources. It is the criminal justice system’s duty to protect citizens while not wasting resources and when “schizophrenia is a chronic, sever, and disabling brain disorder that affects about 1.1 percent of the United States population,” action needs to be taken to minimize damage according to the National Institute of Mental Health 2010 (Schizophrenia Facts and Statistics). The problem will not go away on its own, and when ignored, tragedy happens.…

    • 3544 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays