Preview

Ohio Insanity Case Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1349 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ohio Insanity Case Analysis
This paper will include what the insanity statutes are in Ohio, the state that I live in. I will also talk about how often the insanity defense is used in the United States. As well as how successful this defense is. I will also discuss if psychologists should give their ultimate opinion in regards to sanity cases as well as the ethical issues that may rise from their opinions. Lastly, I will discuss how difficult it is to provide adequate psychological care for mentally ill patients while they are incarcerated in prison. The care they would have received had they been institutionalized in a mental hospital instead would have resulted in fewer deaths. According to FindLaw.com, the statute that Ohio uses for the insanity defense is the M’Naghten …show more content…
According to our textbook, Wrightman’s Psychology and the Legal System, M’Naghten had paranoid delusions. He believed that the Prime Minister, Robert Peel, was aligned with the Tory Party in a conspiracy against him. He tried to run, but when that didn’t do the trick, he returned and stalked the Prime Minister. He later shot a man, who he believed to be the Prime Minister, but he actually killed the private security of the British Prime Minister. He was charged with murder, but after a couple of days of medical experts testifying, he was found not guilty by reasons of insanity (NGRI). (Greene & Heilbrun, 2011 pg.210) Our text describes the M’Naghten rule as “The jury ought to be told in all cases that every man is to be presumed to be sane, and to possess a sufficient degree of reason to be responsible for his crimes, until the contrary be …show more content…
According to Frontline, it is used in “less than 1 percent of felony cases, and is successful in only a fraction of those” (Insanity defense faqs). Less than one percent, that’s how many times the insanity defense is used. According to the National Institute of Corrections, “In a 2006 Special Report, the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) estimated that 705,600 mentally ill adults were incarcerated in State prisons, 78,800 in Federal prisons and 479,900 in local jails” (Mentally ill persons). Look at those numbers. The number of mentally ill adults incarcerated in state, federal and local prisons or jails is a staggering one million two hundred sixty four thousand three hundred mentally ill, that is 1,264,300 incarcerated in the United States. Why then, is the percentage less than1% when it comes to those who use the insanity defense during court? The Sentencing Project says that there are “2.2 million people currently in the nation's prisons or jails” (Incarceration). According to the numbers, the mentally ill make up more than 1% of those incarcerated. In fact, the mentally ill in the prison system is at 57% of those in the entire prison system. How is it that 57% of inmates in prison are mentally ill, but only 1% use the insanity defense? What is wrong with the insanity defense then? For starters, it is difficult to prove and the burden of proof lies on the
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Billy Murphy Case Summary
    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Billy Murphy Case Summary

    McMurphy's (Mac) behaviors do not seem to be symptoms of insanity. The case of Durham vs. United States held that "the accused is not criminally responsible if his unlawful act was the product of mental disease or mental defect". Mac was trying to get out of the work farm by acting out and convincing the staff that he was insane. Once he was brought to the ward it was determined by the doctors and Nurse Ratched that he was not insane, but could be dangerous. In 1972 the Durham rule was replaced because of confusion in the courts about the definition of "disease". It was replaced by legal guidelines formulated by the American Law Institute and was combined with the M'Naughten principle. Basically it states that a person is not responsible for a criminal wrongdoing if at the time they do not understand the difference between right and wrong and they have not repeated the criminal offence because of their mental disease. Mac knows the difference between right and wrong and he tells the other patients that they are not insane. At the beginning of the movie when Mac is talking to Dr. Spivey, it is mentioned that Mac has had at least 5 arrests for assault. This shows that he knows that he is wrong, but continues to do…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Summary Of Dennis Pozniak's Insanity Case
    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Summary Of Dennis Pozniak's Insanity Case

    This means that the guilty individual receives the fairest possible sentence. A comparison to another insanity defense used, was the case of the Esposita brothers who had clearly faked being insane to get out of a death sentence. The Esposita brothers set a plan to gain money through robbery and were well equipped to take lives if anyone stood in the way. Both brothers were charged for murder of police officers and citizens. During their court trial, the Esposita brothers pretended to show signs of insanity by speaking in gibberish and banging their heads against the table. The jury was not convinced due to lack of evidence showing past history of insanity and had sentenced them to death by electrocution in 1942. This is one of many cases where a criminal had attempted to get out of a deserving consequence by using the insanity defense. Although it is rarely the case, some criminals convince the judge that they truly are insane when in fact, they were simply successful in fooling the judge. In comparison to the case of Dennis Pozniak who clearly was insane, it was determined that there was no benefit to the actions performed by Dennis and it was simply a spontaneous event that was brought due to an insane state of mind. Is it fair for an individual to get out of their deserved consequence simply because they convinced the judge that they are insane? I believe that unless the…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mcnaughton's Defense: The Insanity Defense
    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mcnaughton's Defense: The Insanity Defense

    The Insanity defense first came into England’s radar when Daniel McNaughton, who attempted to murder, Prime Minister Robert Peel. McNaughton Rule became a common law test to determine criminal liability in relation to mentally disturbed defendants. Another notable case is that of Reagan, John Hinckley who in 1981 attempted to assassinate the president.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Insanity Defense Case Study
    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Insanity Defense Case Study

    Explain how a determinist view of free will versus a libertarianism view of free will changes the argument for the insanity defense, and capital punishment.…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Eddie Routh Case Study
    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Eddie Routh Case Study

    Two cases with defendants who both have plead not guilty by reason of insanity, have been given two different rulings despite the fact that they both have mental illnesses. In James Holmes’ trial, Holmes killed twelve people and injured more than seventy in his local movie theater. Holmes was found not guilty by reason of insanity, but a psychiatrist claimed him to be legally sane, but had a mental illness.(Ingold and Phillips) If Holmes was ‘legally sane’ but mentally ill then he should not have been found not guilty by reason of INSANITY. In the Eddie Routh case, he was given a life sentence and had suffered severe PTSD and schizophrenia prior to the crime. (Banner) According to the Model Penal Code would not Routh's mental illness be the cause of his crime and excuse him from the sentence? The court is acting unjust, inconsistent, and illogical in their rulings to these defendants who both have records of mental illness, or claims of mental illness, but one walks into the prison at the end of the day and the other walks into the mental ward. The rules currently in action allow judges to rule based on what seems to be their unlogical personal opinion after maybe reviewing the mental illness records, maybe not, their pigheaded personality will…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psy/270 Mind over Matter
    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Psy/270 Mind over Matter

    The second prong of McNaughten rule states “knowledge of right and wrong” (Gibeaut, 2006) with this rule, the individual must be able to prove that he or she was suffering from a mental illness during the act, and was not able to establish right from wrong. According to Gibeaut (2006) “a defendant who pleads insanity must prove that at the time of the offense he or she was suffering from a mental disease, so severely as not to know the nature and quality of the act” (pp.13).…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    By Reason of Insanity: Should Defendants with Traumatic Brain Injuries Be Held Accountable for Their Actions
    • 2068 Words
    • 9 Pages

    By Reason of Insanity: Should Defendants with Traumatic Brain Injuries Be Held Accountable for Their Actions

    By Reason of Insanity: Should Defendants with Traumatic Brain Injuries Be Held Accountable for Their Actions…

    • 2068 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Profound Pros And Cons Of The Insanity Defense
    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Profound Pros And Cons Of The Insanity Defense

    The insanity defense should be allowed for those with a mental illness when they commit a crime since they are not in control of their actions. “If a person really does have mental incapacity, and it will be considered that his condition has caused him to commit a capital crime, which means the defense could save his life. Put in mind that a capital crime carries a punishment of eventual death. However, being found not guilty because of insanity means that a capital punishment is out of the question. It could mean that the accused would just be housed at a professional mental health treatment center. Though it might not be jail, still it gets him off the streets,” (12 Profound Pros and Cons of the Insanity Defense [Web log post]. (n.d.). Retrieved May 16,…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Insanity Defense Analysis
    • 109 Words
    • 1 Page

    Insanity Defense Analysis

    When I try to reason how people would interpret the insanity defense, it reminds me of the common misconceptions that juror's have of the defense itself. In the textbook it examines the various insanity defenses and the courts perception of the defenses, while in the video, Lionel tries to examine peoples reactions to the insanity defense. In the textbook while it went to how the defense's many interpretations have effected case outcomes, Lionel's video tries to clarify that how average Americans cant handle the horrors they see when looking at the crime scene photo's and then trying to decide that the defendant could be considered for a insanity defense.…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity
    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity

    The first article I read was “A Suitable Punishment the Future of the Insanity Defense”. In the article the author talks about the insanity defense and how the public dislikes it. The general public believes that it is a cop out and allows people to get away with murder. Mr. Woychuk, being a lawyer, also talks about the battle of expert witnesses, the Mnaghten rule, and other issues related to the insanity plea. He also deals with the ineffectiveness of the American prison system in terms of deterrence and rehabilitation. The ability of the mental hospitals to retain a person until they are fit to leave is also discussed. He suggests this would be a better way of doing things in prisons to stop them from being revolving doors. This is where he then goes off on child rapists. He thinks they should be given an indeterminate sentence so they will not go out and commit the same crime again. Not allowing the criminals to commit these horrible acts would stop the cycle of kids being abused and then becoming dysfunctional as adults. Overall Mr. Woychuk believes that if the issue of personal responsibility is not dealt with properly we will continue to have violence and excuses for it.…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Insanity Defense
    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Insanity Defense

    And often the cases involving an insanity plea gets the most attention because they involve crime that are bizarre within themselves. On February 22, 2016 an article name “Maryland Mom Found Not Responsible in Boy Death in Swing” was release. This article shares with us that Simms was found not responsible in her son’s death. Simms was found pushing her son in a park swing for 40 hours until he died from hypothermia and dehydration. “She was then ruled not criminally responsible, Maryland's equivalent to not guilty by reason of insanity.”(Ahn) She was later found not responsible since she was declare to have schizophrenia. She was ruled not to be a danger to the community and was freed on a conditional release.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Irresistible Naghten Rule Of Insanity
    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Irresistible Naghten Rule Of Insanity

    The M'Naghten Rule is used for testing legal insanity, sometimes refereed to as the "right-wrong" test which is used by most states, Criminal defendants that are found to be legally insane cannot be convicted of charges arising from that specific mental defect or disability. Courts use one of these legal tests to determine whether a defendant truly is legally insane. (The M'Naghten Rule (n.d.). The M'Naghten Rule focuses on determining if a criminal defendant knew he or she was committing a crime or understood right from wrong at the time it was committed.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Insanity Defense: Compromise Between Society And The Law
    • 3454 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Insanity Defense: Compromise Between Society And The Law

    Many people have heard about the insanity defense in different famous cases where it has come up and been used. The insanity defense is a compromise between society and the law, meaning that society believes that criminals shouldn 't be punished if they are mentally incapable of controlling their conduct. There is a lot of controversy with the insanity defense, like questions such as what is the different if an insane person killed someone and if a sane person killed someone, the person is still dead. To which most have a point, it is still wrong but it all becomes an ethical game with killing someone who didn 't understand or comprehend what they did was wrong. The court defines it as there was only a crime committed if the person committed…

    • 3454 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Insanity Defense Essay
    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Insanity Defense Essay

    The insanity defense is a topic that seems to garner a lot of public attention even though it is rarely used and is rarely successful. So why is this topic so popular considering its rarity? The answer could be a combination of highly publicized cases that use the insanity defense and the public’s misunderstanding of exactly what happens when someone is found not guilty by reason of insanity. The public has a common misconception that someone found not guilty by reason of insanity it just let go and not punished for his or her crimes, but in reality a person is almost always committed and often longer time than if the defendant had gone to prison…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Insanity Defense
    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Essay On Insanity Defense

    It has called for a new definition of the word “insanity” and has caused many new standards to be put in place. A new standard, for example, is the competency test. All jurisdictions require that criminals must be competent to stand trial, meaning that the accused knows the nature of their actions and understand that what they did was wrong, if they cannot do that they will be found to be mentally incompetent to stand the trial (FindLaw). This, however, does not mean that the person is immediately found not guilty or innocent. The person will receive treatment until they are competent enough to stand trial. The insanity defense also called for a reform act in 1984, stating that the defendant must be unable to understand the “nature and quality of the wrongfulness of his acts” (FindLaw). It also states that a mental disease does not constitute as an argument. Lastly, the insanity defense has called for a test that decides if the criminal is mentally ill, however, guilty. The guilty but mentally ill verdict allows criminals who are mentally ill to be found liable for their actions and receive treatment while in jail or be sent to a mental hospital. Once they are seen to be well enough, they will be sent to prison to serve their…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics